Modeling and prediction for 3D surface topography in finish turning with conventional and wiper inserts

Abstract Wiper insert have the characteristics of achieving an excellent surface finish and improving the productivity in turning processes. Wiper insert can provide twice feed rate while maintaining the comparable surface roughness compared to that provided by the conventional insert. In the present study, surface topographies in finish turning with conventional and wiper inserts are investigated. The key element of this work is that the cutting edge path equation in the cutting tool coordinate system is transformed into the machine tool and workpiece coordinate system by the use of spatial coordinate transformation. Following that a surface topography simulation algorithm based on the cutting edge path equation and cutting parameters is put forward. The output of this work is that both the simulated surface topography and surface roughness profile are good agreement with the experimental results. Both the simulated and the actual machined surface results show that better surface topography is obtained in finish turning with the wiper insert than that with conventional insert. Burnishing effect of the wiper insert leads to half decrease of the Ra and Rz. The actual surface profiles are no longer regular wave shapes due to ploughing effect and side flow existing in the cutting zone. In addition, a surface roughness map has also been developed to optimize the selection of wiper radius and feed rate to satisfy the requirement of surface finishing with higher productivity. From the viewpoint of cutting tool design, the wiper radius with five times larger than tool nose radius can fully come into its role. This provides a novel insight into the design of wiper insert over conventional techniques. Above all, the proposed model gives a better prediction of surface roughness in finish turning process compared to the previous empirical and regression roughness models. The prediction of surface roughness in finish turning with wiper insert is also realized.

[1]  Haiyan Zhang,et al.  Modeling and predicting for surface topography considering tool wear in milling process , 2013 .

[2]  Mehdi Tajdari,et al.  Surface roughness modelling in hard turning operation of AISI 4140 using CBN cutting tool , 2010 .

[3]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Machinability investigations in hard turning of AISI D2 cold work tool steel with conventional and wiper ceramic inserts , 2009 .

[4]  Durmus Karayel,et al.  Prediction and control of surface roughness in CNC lathe using artificial neural network , 2009 .

[5]  M. Sarwar,et al.  The economic benefit of finish turning with coated carbide , 1996 .

[6]  Lei Zhang,et al.  2D/3D ground surface topography modeling considering dressing and wear effects in grinding process , 2013 .

[7]  J. Guddat,et al.  Hard turning of AISI 52100 using PCBN wiper geometry inserts and the resulting surface integrity , 2011 .

[8]  Tarek Mabrouki,et al.  Comparative assessment of wiper and conventional ceramic tools on surface roughness in hard turning AISI 4140 steel , 2013 .

[9]  Song Zhang,et al.  Empirical models and optimal cutting parameters for cutting forces and surface roughness in hard milling of AISI H13 steel , 2010 .

[10]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Comparative evaluation of conventional and wiper ceramic tools on cutting forces, surface roughness, and tool wear in hard turning AISI D2 steel , 2007 .

[11]  P. V. Rao,et al.  A surface roughness prediction model for hard turning process , 2007 .

[12]  W. König,et al.  Turning versus grinding: a comparison of surface integrity aspects and attainable accuracies , 1993 .

[13]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Advanced Tool Edge Geometry for High Precision Hard Turning , 2005 .

[14]  David K. Aspinwall,et al.  The surface integrity of turned and ground hardened bearing steel , 1996 .

[15]  Gérard Poulachon,et al.  Wear behavior of CBN tools while turning various hardened steels , 2004 .

[16]  Y. K. Chou,et al.  Tool nose radius effects on finish hard turning , 2004 .

[17]  Noordin Mohd Yusof,et al.  Hard Machining of Stainless Steel Using Wiper Coated Carbide: Tool Life and Surface Integrity , 2010 .

[18]  Steven Y. Liang,et al.  Process Optimization of Finish Turning of Hardened Steels , 2007 .

[19]  C. Lartigue,et al.  Surface topography in ball end milling process: Description of a 3D surface roughness parameter , 2008 .

[20]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Surface roughness measurement in turning carbon steel AISI 1045 using wiper inserts , 2011 .

[21]  W. Grzesik,et al.  Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts , 2006 .

[22]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Modelling of surface finish and tool flank wear in turning of AISI D2 steel with ceramic wiper inserts , 2007 .

[23]  Suleyman Neseli,et al.  Optimization of tool geometry parameters for turning operations based on the response surface methodology , 2011 .

[24]  Mario Guagliano,et al.  Numerical and experimental analysis of surface roughness generated by shot peening , 2012 .