Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction in the Operation Stage of Cross Laminated Timber Residential Buildings in China

This paper focused on energy consumption and carbon emission for heating and cooling during a building’s operation stage, and examined the energy effects of using Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) as an alternative building material to reinforced concrete (RC) in China’s 31 key cities located in different climate zones. The authors designed two seven-story residential buildings, which were constructed with RC framed and CLT systems, separately. This was followed by simulating the energy consumption using commercialized software IES TM under the different climate zones and calculating the carbon emissions. Comparisons were made between RC and CLT systems buildings on the basis of simulation data. The results show that the estimated energy consumption and carbon emission in CLT buildings are much lower than that of RC buildings in all studied cities, which indicates that CLT systems have good potential in reducing carbon emission and saving energy consumption compared to RC. The energy consumptions and carbon emissions in both concrete and CLT buildings are closely related to the climate zones. Buildings in Severe Cold and Cold Regions consumed the most energy and released more carbon. At the national level, the estimated energy consumption at the operation stage, in the studied building with RC frames and CLT system was approximately 465.1 MJ/m 2 and 332.6 MJ/m 2 per annum, respectively. Despite vast differences in China’s climate zones, the effects of energy saving and carbon reduction potentials of CLT buildings show little relationship to the climate zone. CLT buildings may result in a weighted 29.4% energy saving, which equals 24.6% carbon reductions, compared with RC buildings at the operation stage at national level, although it may vary in different climate zones.

[1]  Hiroki Tanikawa,et al.  Materials demand and environmental impact of buildings construction and demolition in China based on dynamic material flow analysis , 2013 .

[2]  F. Gao,et al.  Life Cycle Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emission of Residential Building Designs in Beijing , 2012 .

[3]  Richard A. Birdsey,et al.  Tree age, disturbance history, and carbon stocks and fluxes in subalpine Rocky Mountain forests , 2008 .

[4]  Abbas Elmualim,et al.  A case study to investigate the life cycle carbon emissions and carbon storage capacity of a cross laminated timber, multi-storey residential building , 2013 .

[5]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  A close look at the China Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings , 2009 .

[6]  Nianping Li,et al.  A statistical method to investigate national energy consumption in the residential building sector of China , 2008 .

[7]  Lei Wang,et al.  Use of wood in green building: a study of expert perspectives from the UK , 2014 .

[8]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  An analysis of the embodied energy of office buildings by height , 2001 .

[9]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Heating and cooling energy trends and drivers in buildings , 2015 .

[10]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[11]  Steve Hubbard,et al.  CRADLE-TO-GATE LIFE-CYCLE INVENTORY OF US WOOD PRODUCTS PRODUCTION: CORRIM PHASE I AND PHASE II PRODUCTS , 2010 .

[12]  U. Berardi A cross-country comparison of the building energy consumptions and their trends , 2017 .

[13]  Nan Zhou,et al.  China's Building Energy Use , 2007 .

[14]  H. Zhou,et al.  Feasibility of manufacturing cross-laminated timber using fast-grown small diameter eucalyptus lumbers , 2017 .

[15]  Omar A Espinoza,et al.  Outlook for Cross-Laminated Timber in the United States , 2014 .

[16]  Wen-Shao Chang,et al.  Assessing Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) as an Alternative Material for Mid-Rise Residential Buildings in Cold Regions in China—A Life-Cycle Assessment Approach , 2016 .

[17]  S. Dhakal Urban energy use and carbon emissions from cities in China and policy implications , 2009 .

[18]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[19]  P. Börjesson,et al.  Greenhouse gas balances in building construction : wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives , 2000 .

[20]  R. Brandner,et al.  Cross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development , 2015, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products.

[21]  武彦 福島 持続可能性(Sustainability)の要件 , 2006 .

[22]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building , 2010 .

[23]  Christopher S. Galik,et al.  Forest Management Solutions for Mitigating Climate Change in the United States , 2008, Journal of Forestry.

[24]  Seiji Hashimoto,et al.  Concrete transformation of buildings in China and implications for the steel cycle , 2015 .

[25]  Dario Trabucco,et al.  An analysis of the relationship between service cores and the embodied/running energy of tall buildings , 2008 .

[26]  Scott A. Bowe,et al.  Environmental Impact of Manufacturing Softwood Lumber in Northeastern and North Central United States , 2010 .

[27]  Kai Chang,et al.  Cutting CO2 intensity targets of interprovincial emissions trading in China , 2016 .

[28]  Paolo Foraboschi,et al.  Sustainable structural design of tall buildings based on embodied energy , 2014 .

[29]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .