Psychometric properties of the Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire.

PURPOSE To describe psychometric properties of a self-report questionnaire, the Veterans Affairs (VA) Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (LV VFQ-48), which was designed to measure the difficulty visually impaired persons have performing daily activities and to evaluate low-vision outcomes. METHODS The VA LV VFQ-48 was administered by telephone interview to subjects with visual acuity ranging from near normal to total blindness at five sites in the VA and private sector. Rasch analysis with the Andrich rating scale model was applied to difficulty ratings from 367 subjects, to evaluate measurement properties of the instrument. RESULTS High intercenter correlations for item measure estimates (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.97) justified pooling the data from these sites. The person measure fit statistics (mean square residuals) confirm that the data fit the assumptions of the model. The item measure fit statistics indicate that responses to 19% of the items were confounded by factors other than visual ability. The separation reliabilities for pooled data (0.94 for persons and 0.98 for items) demonstrate that the estimated measures discriminate persons and items well along the visual ability dimension. ICCs for test-retest data (0.98 for items and 0.84 for persons) confirm temporal stability. Subjects used the rating categories in the same way at all five centers. Ratings of slight and moderate difficulty were used interchangeably, suggesting that the instrument could be modified to a 4-point scale including not difficult, slightly/moderately difficult, extremely difficult, and impossible. Fifty additional subjects were administered the questionnaire with a 4-point scale to confirm that the scale was used in the same way when there were four rather than five difficulty ratings. CONCLUSIONS The VA LV VFQ-48 is valid and reliable and has the range and precision necessary to measure visual ability of low-vision patients with moderate to severe vision loss across diverse clinical settings.

[1]  J. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  The development of the LV Prasad-Functional Vision Questionnaire: a measure of functional vision performance of visually impaired children. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  R. Massof,et al.  A self-assessment instrument designed for measuring independent mobility in RP patients: generalizability to glaucoma patients. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  J. Stelmack,et al.  Quality of Life of Low-Vision Patients and Outcomes of Low-Vision Rehabilitation , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  Robert W Massof,et al.  Measuring low-vision rehabilitation outcomes with the NEI VFQ-25. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  B. P. Murphy,et al.  Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics , 1968 .

[6]  R. Hays,et al.  Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators , 1998 .

[7]  Beth T. Stalvey,et al.  Older drivers and cataract: driving habits and crash risk. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[8]  Thomas R. Stelmack,et al.  Patients’ Perceptions of the Need for Low Vision Devices , 2003 .

[9]  A W Johnston,et al.  The development of the Melbourne low-vision ADL index: a measure of vision disability. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  T. Mallinson,et al.  Maintaining instrument quality while reducing items: application of Rasch analysis to a self-report of visual function. , 2000, Journal of outcome measurement.

[11]  Robert W. Massof,et al.  Evaluation of the NEI visual functioning questionnaire as an interval measure of visual ability in low vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[12]  Robert W Massof,et al.  The Measurement of Vision Disability , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  C. Striem,et al.  Vision Rehabilitation assessment, intervention and outcomes , 2000 .

[14]  Herbert Menzel,et al.  A New Coefficient for Scalogram Analysis , 1953 .

[15]  P. Vargha,et al.  A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  R. Massof,et al.  Perceived visual ability for independent mobility in persons with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  Robert W Massof,et al.  Use of Rasch person-item map in exploratory data analysis: a clinical perspective. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  Willem J. van der Linden,et al.  Book reviews: Applying the Rasch Model , 2001 .

[19]  R. Massof,et al.  Visual function assessment questionnaires. , 2001, Survey of ophthalmology.

[20]  R. Luce,et al.  Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement , 1964 .

[21]  C. Velozo,et al.  A Comparison of the Separation Ratio and Coefficient &agr; in the Creation of Minimum Item Sets , 2004, Medical care.

[22]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  D. Andrich.  Rating Scale Analysis , 1999 .

[24]  G. Rubin.  RELIABILITY AND SENSITIVITY OF CLINICAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TESTS , 1988 .

[25]  Richard M. Smith.  The Distributional Properties of Rasch Item Fit Statistics , 1991 .

[26]  Konrad Pesudovs,et al.  The Activities of Daily Vision Scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  R. Massof,et al.  Performance of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire , 2004 .

[28]  A. Damiano,et al.  The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. , 1994, Archives of ophthalmology.

[29]  D. Andrich.  A rating formulation for ordered response categories , 1978 .

[30]  T. H. Allegri.  The Code of Federal Regulations , 1986 .