Path Planning of Multi-Modal Underwater Vehicle for Adaptive Sampling Using Delaunay Spatial Partition-Ant Colony Optimization

Multi-modal underwater vehicle (MUV) is a newly ocean observation platform with the capability to switch between Argo mode and glider mode. This paper presents an efficient and effective path planner to generate trajectory that exploits ocean energy and makes use of favorable ocean currents to propel and lead the MUV to collect ocean measurements located in high scientific interest areas. The proposed strategy employs MUV mode transition within path planner to enable efficient operation of MUV to drift with ocean currents for measurements and transform to operate as an underwater glider for locomotion. The novel hybrid scheme is the first to integrate tournament selection based Delaunay triangulation into ant colony optimization (ACO), herein referred to as DSP-ACO path planner to facilitate more efficient searching for adaptive ocean sampling problem (AOSP). Simulation results show that the proposed DSP-ACO path planner is capable to take advantage of ocean currents and obtain a more optimal trajectory with quicker convergence rate than conventional ACO path planner. Meanwhile, MUV transforms operation between Argo mode and glider mode is more energy efficient to take measurements than underwater glider. Monte Carlo simulation is run to assess the robustness of the DSP-ACO path planner and demonstrates the inherent superiority of the proposed DSP-ACO path planner.

[1]  Somaiyeh Mahmoud Zadeh,et al.  IDVD-based trajectory generator for autonomous underwater docking operations , 2017, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Ales Zamuda,et al.  Constrained differential evolution optimization for underwater glider path planning in sub-mesoscale eddy sampling , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[3]  Joonwoo Lee,et al.  Heterogeneous-ants-based path planner for global path planning of mobile robot applications , 2017 .

[4]  Mohammad Pourmahmood Aghababa,et al.  Application of GA, PSO, and ACO algorithms to path planning of autonomous underwater vehicles , 2012 .

[5]  Karl Sammut,et al.  A survey on path planning for persistent autonomy of autonomous underwater vehicles , 2015 .

[6]  Lionel Lapierre,et al.  Survey on Fuzzy-Logic-Based Guidance and Control of Marine Surface Vehicles and Underwater Vehicles , 2018, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[7]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Planning and Implementing Trajectories for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles to Track Evolving Ocean Processes Based on Predictions from a Regional Ocean Model , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Qidi Wu,et al.  A fast two-stage ACO algorithm for robotic path planning , 2011, Neural Computing and Applications.

[9]  Alberto Alvarez,et al.  Path planning for autonomous underwater vehicles in realistic oceanic current fields: Application to gliders in the Western Mediterranean sea , 2009 .

[10]  Dayal R. Parhi,et al.  Navigation of underwater robot based on dynamically adaptive harmony search algorithm , 2016, Memetic Comput..

[11]  N.M. Patrikalakis,et al.  Path Planning of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles for Adaptive Sampling Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming , 2008, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[12]  Zhen Fan,et al.  A novel coordinated path planning method using k-degree smoothing for multi-UAVs , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[13]  José Antonio López Orozco,et al.  Ant colony optimization for multi-UAV minimum time search in uncertain domains , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[14]  Zhongjiu Zheng,et al.  Global Asymptotic Model-Free Trajectory-Independent Tracking Control of an Uncertain Marine Vehicle: An Adaptive Universe-Based Fuzzy Control Approach , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[15]  Marco Cococcioni,et al.  Mission Planning and Decision Support for Underwater Glider Networks: A Sampling on-Demand Approach , 2015, Sensors.

[16]  D. Rudnick Ocean Research Enabled by Underwater Gliders. , 2016, Annual review of marine science.

[17]  Alberto Alvarez,et al.  Combining networks of drifting profiling floats and gliders for adaptive sampling of the Ocean , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  Franz S. Hover,et al.  Multi-goal feasible path planning using ant colony optimization , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[19]  Ales Zamuda,et al.  Differential evolution and underwater glider path planning applied to the short-term opportunistic sampling of dynamic mesoscale ocean structures , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[20]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms, Tournament Selection, and the Effects of Noise , 1995, Complex Syst..

[21]  Oscar Castillo,et al.  Path planning for autonomous mobile robot navigation with ant colony optimization and fuzzy cost function evaluation , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Persistent ocean monitoring with underwater gliders: Adapting sampling resolution , 2011, J. Field Robotics.

[23]  Mohammad Pourmahmood Aghababa,et al.  3D path planning for underwater vehicles using five evolutionary optimization algorithms avoiding static and energetic obstacles , 2012 .

[24]  Lian Lian,et al.  Adaptive Re-planning of AUVs for Environmental Sampling Missions: A Fuzzy Decision Support System Based on Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization , 2018, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[25]  P. Raja,et al.  Optimal path planning of mobile robots: A review , 2012 .

[26]  Lian Lian,et al.  Toward Optimal Rendezvous of Multiple Underwater Gliders: 3D Path Planning with Combined Sawtooth and Spiral Motion , 2016, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems.

[27]  Daniel L. Rudnick,et al.  On sampling the ocean using underwater gliders , 2011 .

[28]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  An information-driven and disturbance-aware planning method for long-term ocean monitoring , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[29]  Georgios Ch. Sirakoulis,et al.  Cellular ants: A method to create collision free trajectories for a cooperative robot team , 2011, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[30]  D. T. Lee,et al.  Two algorithms for constructing a Delaunay triangulation , 1980, International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences.

[31]  Ryan N. Smith,et al.  Controlling Buoyancy-Driven Profiling Floats for Applications in Ocean Observation , 2014, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[32]  Lian Lian,et al.  Drifting and Gliding: Design of a Multimodal Underwater Vehicle , 2018, 2018 OCEANS - MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO).

[33]  Karl Sammut,et al.  Rendezvous Path Planning for Multiple Autonomous Marine Vehicles , 2018, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[34]  Qin Zhang,et al.  On intelligent risk analysis and critical decision of underwater robotic vehicle , 2017 .

[35]  Karl Sammut,et al.  Shell space decomposition based path planning for AUVs operating in a variable environment , 2014 .

[36]  Karl Sammut,et al.  A comparison of optimization techniques for AUV path planning in environments with ocean currents , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[37]  Xiaohui Wang,et al.  Path Planning Method of Underwater Glider Based on Energy Consumption Model in Current Environment , 2014, ICIRA.

[38]  Russ E. Davis,et al.  AUTONOMOUS PROFILING FLOATS: WORKHORSE FOR BROAD-SCALE OCEAN OBSERVATIONS , 2004 .

[39]  Aghil Yousefi-Koma,et al.  Three-dimensional optimal path planning for waypoint guidance of an autonomous underwater vehicle , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[40]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  AUV Rendezvous Online Path Planning in a Highly Cluttered Undersea Environment Using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2016, ArXiv.

[41]  Karl Sammut,et al.  Efficient Path Re-planning for AUVs Operating in Spatiotemporal Currents , 2015, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..