A meta‐analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions

Biotic resistance describes the ability of resident species in a community to reduce the success of exotic invasions. Although resistance is a well-accepted phenomenon, less clear are the processes that contribute most to it, and whether those processes are strong enough to completely repel invaders. Current perceptions of strong, competition-driven biotic resistance stem from classic ecological theory, Elton’s formulation of ecological resistance, and the general acceptance of the enemies-release hypothesis. We conducted a meta-analysis of the plant invasions literature to quantify the contribution of resident competitors, diversity, herbivores and soil fungal communities to biotic resistance. Results indicated large negative effects of all factors except fungal communities on invader establishment and performance. Contrary to predictions derived from the natural enemies hypothesis, resident herbivores reduced invasion success as effectively as resident competitors. Although biotic resistance significantly reduced the establishment of individual invaders, we found little evidence that species interactions completely repelled invasions. We conclude that ecological interactions rarely enable communities to resist invasion, but instead constrain the abundance of invasive species once they have successfully established.

[1]  Mark Rees,et al.  Effects of Temporal Variability on Rare Plant Persistence in Annual Systems , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[2]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis , 2004 .

[3]  David Tilman,et al.  Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? - evidence from pair-wise experiments , 2004 .

[5]  R. Callaway,et al.  SOIL FUNGI ALTER INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE INVADER CENTAUREA MACULOSA AND NORTH AMERICAN NATIVES , 2004 .

[6]  C. D’Antonio,et al.  Can Carbon Addition Increase Competitiveness of Native Grasses? A Case Study from California , 2004 .

[7]  Alex C Rodriguez,et al.  Soil biota and exotic plant invasion , 2004, Nature.

[8]  J. Denslow,et al.  NATURAL‐ENEMY RELEASE FACILITATES HABITAT EXPANSION OF THE INVASIVE TROPICAL SHRUB CLIDEMIA HIRTA , 2004 .

[9]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Simple traits do not predict grazing response in Australian dry shrublands and woodlands , 2004 .

[10]  C. D’Antonio,et al.  Constraints to colonization and growth of the African grass, Melinis minutiflora, in a Venezuelan savanna , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[11]  S. Wilson,et al.  Competitive abilities of introduced and native grasses , 2001, Plant Ecology.

[12]  I. Parker Safe Site and Seed Limitation in Cytisus Scoparius (Scotch Broom): Invasibility, Disturbance, and the Role of Cryptogams in a Glacial Outwash Prairie , 2001, Biological Invasions.

[13]  M. Mack,et al.  Exotic Grasses Potentially Slow Invasion of an N-fixing Tree into a Hawaiian Woodland , 2001, Biological Invasions.

[14]  R. N. Mack,et al.  The population biology of Bromus tectorum in forests: effect of disturbance, grazing, and litter on seedling establishment and reproduction , 1990, Oecologia.

[15]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[16]  M. Crawley,et al.  Effect of Interspecific Competition and Herbivory on the Recruitment of an Invasive Alien Plant: Conyza sumatrensis , 2004, Biological Invasions.

[17]  A. Packer,et al.  Plant-soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges , 2003 .

[18]  E. Siemann,et al.  Changes in light and nitrogen availability under pioneer trees may indirectly facilitate tree invasions of grasslands , 2003 .

[19]  I. Parker,et al.  INVASIVENESS OF AMMOPHILA ARENARIA: RELEASE FROM SOIL‐BORNE PATHOGENS? , 2003 .

[20]  M. Crawley,et al.  The effects of herbivory and competition on the invasive alien plant Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae) , 2003 .

[21]  D. Tilman,et al.  Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  T. Lenz,et al.  Shade facilitates an invasive stem succulent in a chenopod shrubland in South Australia , 2003 .

[23]  J. Klironomos,et al.  VARIATION IN PLANT RESPONSE TO NATIVE AND EXOTIC ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI , 2003 .

[24]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Herbivores and the success of exotic plants: a phylogenetically controlled experiment , 2003 .

[25]  Cynthia S. Brown,et al.  Community assembly and invasion: An experimental test of neutral versus niche processes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  K. Kitajima,et al.  MYCORRHIZAE DIFFERENTIALLY ALTER GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND COMPETITIVE ABILITY OF AN INVASIVE SHRUB , 2003 .

[27]  R. Callaway,et al.  SOIL FUNGI AND THE EFFECTS OF AN INVASIVE FORB ON GRASSES: NEIGHBOR IDENTITY MATTERS , 2003 .

[28]  D. Coomes,et al.  Grazing and community structure as determinants of invasion success by Scotch broom in a New Zealand montane shrubland , 2002 .

[29]  M. Grieshop,et al.  Selected factors affecting seedling recruitment of dalmatian toadflax. , 2002 .

[30]  D. Milchunas,et al.  Grazing refuges, external avoidance of herbivory and plant diversity , 2002 .

[31]  David Tilman,et al.  Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion , 2002, Nature.

[32]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Phalaris arundinacea seedling establishment: effects of canopy complexity in fen, mesocosm, and restoration experiments , 2002 .

[33]  W. Putten Plant population biology: How to be invasive , 2002, Nature.

[34]  J. Klironomos Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities , 2002, Nature.

[35]  M. Crawley,et al.  Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis , 2002 .

[36]  J. Dukes SPECIES COMPOSITION AND DIVERSITY AFFECT GRASSLAND SUSCEPTIBILITY AND RESPONSE TO INVASION , 2002 .

[37]  J. Lambrinos THE VARIABLE INVASIVE SUCCESS OF CORTADERIA SPECIES IN A COMPLEX LANDSCAPE , 2002 .

[38]  W. H. van der Putten How to be invasive , 2002, Nature.

[39]  M. Vilà,et al.  When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses , 2001 .

[40]  J. Levine Local interactions, dispersal, and native and exotic plant diversity along a California stream , 2001 .

[41]  B. Mccarthy,et al.  EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION ON THE INVASIVE SUCCESS OF A NONINDIGENOUS FOREST HERB , 2001 .

[42]  R. Callaway,et al.  Compensatory growth and competitive ability of an invasive weed are enhanced by soil fungi and native neighbours , 2001 .

[43]  E. Allen,et al.  Response to ammonium and nitrate by a mycorrhizal annual invasive grass and native shrub in southern California. , 2001, American journal of botany.

[44]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Rare Species Loss Alters Ecosystem Function – Invasion Resistance , 2001 .

[45]  C. D’Antonio,et al.  Ecosystem resistance to invasion and the role of propagule supply: A California perspective , 2001 .

[46]  A. Sparrow,et al.  The importance of dispersal, disturbance, and competition for exotic plant invasions in Arthur's Pass National Park, New Zealand , 2000 .

[47]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Plant community diversity and invasibility by exotics: invasion of Mediterranean old fields by Conyza bonariensis and Conyza canadensis , 2000 .

[48]  M. Bertness,et al.  CLONAL INTEGRATION AND THE EXPANSION OF PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS , 2000 .

[49]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility , 2000 .

[50]  J. Levine Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. , 2000, Science.

[51]  J. Hamilton,et al.  Coexistence and interference between a native perennial grass and non-native annual grasses in California , 1999, Oecologia.

[52]  Jonathan M. Levine,et al.  Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility , 1999 .

[53]  P. Reich,et al.  Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. , 1999, Ecology letters.

[54]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  GLOBAL PATTERNS OF PLANT INVASIONS AND THE CONCEPT OF INVASIBILITY , 1999 .

[55]  R. Callaway,et al.  MYCORRHIZAE INDIRECTLY ENHANCE COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF AN INVASIVE FORB ON A NATIVE BUNCHGRASS , 1999 .

[56]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  EXOTIC PLANT SPECIES INVADE HOT SPOTS OF NATIVE PLANT DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[57]  Marianne Erneberg Effects of herbivory and competition on an introduced plant in decline , 1999, Oecologia.

[58]  R. Reader,et al.  An experimental study of wetland invasibility by purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) , 1999 .

[59]  Susan K. Wiser,et al.  COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND FOREST INVASION BY AN EXOTIC HERB OVER 23 YEARS , 1998 .

[60]  C. D’Antonio,et al.  Fitness of invasive Carpobrotus (Aizoaceae) hybrids in coastal California , 1998 .

[61]  S. D. Cooper,et al.  Effect Size in Ecological Experiments: The Application of Biological Models in Meta‐Analysis , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[62]  M. Rejmánek A theory of seed plant invasiveness: The first sketch , 1996 .

[63]  D. Richardson,et al.  What attributes make some plant species more invasive , 1996 .

[64]  M. Williamson,et al.  The Varying Success of Invaders , 1996 .

[65]  G. Huxel,et al.  Microcosms as models for generating and testing community theory , 1996 .

[66]  C. Thébaud,et al.  Assessing Why Two Introduced Conyza Differ in Their Ability to Invade Mediterranean Old Fields , 1996 .

[67]  P. Hulme HERBIVORES AND THE PERFORMANCE OF GRASSLAND PLANTS : A COMPARISON OF ARTHROPOD, MOLLUSC AND RODENT HERBIVORY , 1996 .

[68]  J. Quinn,et al.  Invasibility of experimental habitat Islands in a California winter annual grassland , 1995 .

[69]  J. R. Griffin,et al.  Introduced and native plants of the hastings reservation, central coastal California : a comparison , 1995 .

[70]  P. Hulme Seedling herbivory in grassland : relative impact of vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores , 1994 .

[71]  R. Sharitz,et al.  Effects of Herbivory on Growth and Biomass Allocation in Native and Introduced Species of Lonicera , 1994 .

[72]  L. Hedges,et al.  Meta-analysis: Combining the results of independent experiments , 1993 .

[73]  C. D’Antonio Mechanisms Controlling Invasion of Coastal Plant Communities by the Alien Succulent Carpobrotus Edulis , 1993 .

[74]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Patterns and Consequences of Interspecific Competition in Natural Communities: A Review of Field Experiments with Plants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[75]  C. Bossard The role of habitat disturbance, seed predation and ant dispersal on establishment of the exotic shrub Cytisus scoparius in California. , 1991 .

[76]  T. O’Connor Local Extinction in Perennial Grasslands: A Life-History Approach , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[77]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Effects of rainfall variability and gopher disturbance on serpentine annual grassland dynamics , 1991 .

[78]  T. Case,et al.  Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  F. Castri,et al.  Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective , 1989 .

[80]  D. Peart SPECIES INTERACTIONS IN A SUCCESSIONAL GRASSLAND. III. EFFECTS OF CANOPY GAPS, GOPHER MOUNDS AND GRAZING ON COLONIZATION , 1989 .

[81]  D. Peart SPECIES INTERACTIONS IN A SUCCESSIONAL GRASSLAND. II. COLONIZATION OF VEGETATED SITES , 1989 .

[82]  Marcel Rejmánek,et al.  Invasibility of plant communities , 1989 .

[83]  Interaction of Disturbance Patch Size and Herbivory in Erodium Colonization , 1987 .

[84]  S. Pacala,et al.  Neighborhood Models of Plant Population Dynamics. I. Single-Species Models of Annuals , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[85]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[86]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  On the Prevalence and Relative Importance of Interspecific Competition: Evidence from Field Experiments , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[87]  S. Pimm,et al.  The Introduced Hawaiian Avifauna: Biogeographic Evidence for Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[88]  D. Simberloff COMMUNITY EFFECTS OF INTRODUCED SPECIES , 1981 .

[89]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[90]  J. Connell,et al.  Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[91]  R M May,et al.  Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[92]  H. G. Baker,et al.  Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. , 1965 .

[93]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition , 1960, The American Naturalist.