Temporal regularity and stimulus control in multiple fixed interval schedules

In multiple fixed interval schedules of reinforcement, different time intervals are signaled by different environmental stimuli which acquire control over behavior. Previous work has shown that temporal performance is controlled not only by external stimuli but also by temporal aspects of the task, depending on the order in which the different intervals are trained – intermixed across trials or in blocks of several trials. The aim of this study was to further describe the training conditions under which the stimuli acquire control over temporal performance. We manipulated the number of consecutive trials of each fixed interval (FI) per training block (Experiment I) and the number of FIs trained (Experiment II). The results suggest that when trained in blocks of several consecutive trials of the same FI, temporal performance is controlled by temporal regularities across trials and not by the visual stimuli that signal the FIs. One possible account for those data is that the temporal cues overshadow the visual stimuli for the control of temporal performance. Similar results have also been observed with humans, which suggest that temporal regularity overcomes the stimuli in the control of behavior in temporal tasks across species.

[1]  R. Church,et al.  Differences between simultaneous and blocked training detected by a transfer test , 2007, Behavioural Processes.

[2]  R. Church,et al.  The effect of stimulus discriminability on strategies for learning multiple temporal discriminations , 2010, Behavioural Processes.

[3]  J. Gibbon.  Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[4]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  Computational Neuroscience for Advancing Artificial Intelligence: Models, Methods and Applications , 2010 .

[5]  Andrew T. Marshall,et al.  Everywhere and everything: The power and ubiquity of time. , 2015, International journal of comparative psychology.

[6]  R. Church,et al.  Determinants of temporal or stimulus control in humans and rats , 2015 .

[7]  W. Roberts,et al.  The effects of cue competition on timing in pigeons , 2010, Behavioural Processes.

[8]  Kimberly S. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Overshadowing and stimulus duration. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[9]  R. Church,et al.  Stimulus control in multiple temporal discriminations , 2012, Learning & behavior.

[10]  I. Pavlov,et al.  Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex , 2010, Annals of Neurosciences.

[11]  Floyd C. Mace,et al.  Schedules of reinforcement , 2011 .

[12]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  Temporal uncertainty during overshadowing: A temporal difference account , 2010 .

[13]  R. Church,et al.  Dynamics of temporal discrimination , 2005, Learning & behavior.

[14]  B. Skinner,et al.  The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis , 2016 .

[15]  A. Machado.  Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior. , 1997, Psychological review.

[16]  R M Church,et al.  Scalar Timing in Memory , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  R. Church,et al.  Application of scalar timing theory to individual trials. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  D. Jennings,et al.  Overshadowing by fixed- and variable-duration stimuli , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The learning curve: implications of a quantitative analysis. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  R. Rescorla.  Behavioral studies of Pavlovian conditioning. , 1988, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  The effect of stimulus distribution form on the acquisition and rate of conditioned responding: implications for theory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.