Tools for innovative thinking in epidemiology.

Innovation is the engine of scientific progress. Concern has been raised by the National Academies of Science about how well America is sustaining its "creative ecosystem." In this commentary, the author argues that we can all improve our ability to think innovatively through instruction and practice. The author presents a series of tools that are currently being taught in a curriculum developed at the University of Texas, based on earlier evidence-based creativity training programs. The tools are these: 1) finding the right question; 2) enhancing observation; 3) using analogies; 4) juggling induction and deduction; 5) changing your point of view; 6) broadening the perspective; 7) dissecting the problem; 8) leveraging serendipity and reversal; 9) reorganization and combination of ideas; 10) getting the most out of groups; and 11) breaking out of habitual expectations and frames. Each tool is explained using examples from science and public health. It is likely that each of us will identify with and agree with the usefulness of one or two of the tools described. Broader mastery of many of these tools, particularly when used in combination, has provided our students with a powerful device for enhancing innovation.

[1]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Creativity and intelligence. , 1998 .

[2]  R. Ness,et al.  Possible role of ovarian epithelial inflammation in ovarian cancer. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  Dot Hs,et al.  Lives Saved Calculations for Seat Belts and Frontal Air Bags , 2009 .

[4]  S. Dosani.  Penicillin Man: Alexander Fleming and the Antibiotic Revolution , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Maria M. Clapham,et al.  The Development of Innovative Ideas Through Creativity Training , 2003 .

[6]  Kevin Brown.  Penicillin Man: Alexander Fleming and the Antibiotic Revolution , 2004 .

[7]  J. Oriel.  Sex and cervical cancer. , 1988, Genitourinary medicine.

[8]  Mary Pat McKay.  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) notes. Seat belt use in 2005: demographic results. , 2006, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  George B. Graen,et al.  Training Effects on Attitudes Toward Divergent Thinking Among Manufacturing Engineers , 1986 .

[10]  C. Rankin,et al.  Analyses of habituation in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2001, Learning & memory.

[11]  H. Needleman.  Low level lead exposure: history and discovery. , 2009, Annals of epidemiology.

[12]  M. Guzmán.  El premio Nobel de Fisiología y Medicina 2005. , 2006 .

[13]  Donna Glassbrenner,et al.  Lives Saved Calculations for Seat Belts and Frontal Air Bags , 2009 .

[14]  R. Sternberg.  Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[15]  Johnny Ryan,et al.  A History of the Internet and the Digital Future , 2010 .

[16]  Min Basadur,et al.  Measuring Preference for Ideation in Creative Problem-Solving Training , 1983 .

[17]  David Quammen,et al.  The reluctant Mr. Darwin : an intimate portrait of Charles Darwin and the making of his theory of evolution , 2007 .

[18]  J. Lindsten,et al.  The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine , 2001 .

[19]  M. Feinleib.  Seven Countries: A Multivariate Analysis of Death and Coronary Heart Disease , 1981 .

[20]  L. Gissmann,et al.  Human papilloma virus DNA: physical mapping and genetic heterogeneity. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Roberta B. Ness,et al.  Innovation Generation: How to Produce Creative and Useful Scientific Ideas , 2012 .

[22]  Glenn W. Suter,et al.  The Reluctant Mr. Darwin , 2006 .

[23]  M. Mumford,et al.  The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review , 2004 .

[24]  L. Boroditsky,et al.  Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  Larisa V. Shavinina.  The international handbook on innovation , 2003 .