The Bayh-Dole Act and High-Technology Entrepreneurship in U.S. Universities: Chicken, Egg, or Something Else?

Academic entrepreneurship (defined in this case as the involvement of university faculty and researchers in commercial development of their inventions) has been a unique characteristic of the U.S. higher education system for most of the past 100 years. This long history of interaction, as well as academic patenting and licensing, contributed to the formation of the political coalitions that led to the passage of the Bayh-Dole Act in 1980. This paper reviews the evidence on university–industry interactions and technology transfer, focusing in particular on the role of the Bayh-Dole Act in (allegedly) transforming this relationship. I also examine recent research that considers the Act's effects on the formation of new, knowledge-based firms that seek to exploit university inventions. This research is in its infancy, and much remains to be done if we are to better understand the relationships among high-technology entrepreneurship, the foundation of new firms, and the patenting and licensing activities of U.S. universities before and after 1980.

[1]  D. Kevles.  Ananda Chakrabarty wins a patent: biotechnology, law, and society, 1972-1980. , 1994, Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS.

[2]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Rebecca S. Eisenberg,et al.  Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research , 1996 .

[4]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America , 1998 .

[5]  W. Broad.  Patent bill returns bright idea to inventor. , 1979, Science.

[6]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[7]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[9]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Vincent L. McKusick.  A study of patent policies in educational institutions, giving specific attention to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology☆ , 1948 .

[11]  Ashley J. Stevens.  Autm Licensing Survey: Fy 2002 , 2003 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[13]  A. Stevens.  The Enactment of Bayh–Dole , 2004 .

[14]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[15]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Patenting and Licensing University Inventions: Lessons from the History of the Research Corporation , 2001 .

[16]  Laurence Veysey,et al.  To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900-1940 , 1986 .

[17]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[18]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[19]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[20]  R. Geiger.  Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II , 1994 .

[21]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Byron E. Shafer.  Is America different? : a new look at American exceptionalism , 1991 .

[23]  C. Weiner.  Patenting and Academic Research: Historical Case Studies , 1987 .

[24]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[25]  Stuart W. Leslie,et al.  The Cold War and American science , 1994 .

[26]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .