Influence of casting method on effectiveness of foot orthoses using plantar pressure distribution: a preliminary study

Background: Existing techniques of taking foot impressions for producing foot orthoses are static, while walking is a dynamic process. Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate a newly developed dynamic casting method for foot orthoses in comparison with static casts. Study Design: Double-blind, randomized two-period cross-over trial. Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers (six women, six men) were randomly assigned within gender to two groups. The first group wore orthoses made from static casts for two weeks and then orthoses made from dynamic casts for two weeks, and the second group vice versa. The orthoses were worn during work in sports shoes. The outcome measure was coefficient of variation (CV, defined as standard deviation/mean) over seven measurement spots on each foot. Results: Foot orthoses produced by a dynamic casting system redistributed plantar pressure (reduced CV) more effectively in the first period on both feet. In the second period, carry-over effect and/or treatment wearing off was observed. Conclusion: The dynamic casting procedure is simple, low-cost and appears promising, but further research is needed to introduce it into clinical practice.

[1]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Off-Loading the Diabetic Foot for Ulcer Prevention and Healing , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  E. Roos,et al.  Foot Orthoses for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis , 2006, Foot & ankle international.

[3]  James Woodburn,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of foot orthoses in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.

[4]  D. M. Lynch,et al.  Mechanical treatment of plantar fasciitis. A prospective study. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[5]  L. Sheiner,et al.  Understanding the Dose-Effect Relationship , 1981, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[6]  E. Laskowski,et al.  Effect of magnetic vs sham-magnetic insoles on plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[7]  Ji-Hye Hwang,et al.  Randomized controlled trial for clinical effects of varying types of insoles combined with specialized shoes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the foot. , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  Stephen Senn,et al.  Cross-over trials in clinical research , 1993 .

[9]  M. Schulzer,et al.  Metatarsalgia and rheumatoid arthritis--a randomized, single blind, sequential trial comparing 2 types of foot orthoses and supportive shoes. , 2000, The Journal of rheumatology.

[10]  Gaj Vidmar,et al.  Influence of foot orthoses on plantar pressures, foot pain and walking ability of rheumatoid arthritis patients–a randomised controlled study , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  N. Maffulli,et al.  Management of calcaneal fractures: systematic review of randomized trials. , 2009, British medical bulletin.

[12]  D. Hedeker,et al.  Impacts of foot orthoses on pain and disability in rheumatoid arthritics. , 1996, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

[13]  A. Randolph,et al.  Use of computerized insole sensor system to evaluate the efficacy of a modified ankle-foot orthosis for redistributing heel pressures. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Angela Evans,et al.  Non-surgical interventions for paediatric pes planus. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  H. Handoll,et al.  Interventions for preventing and treating stress fractures and stress reactions of bone of the lower limbs in young adults. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  J. Grizzle.  THE TWO-PERIOD CHANGE-OVER DESIGN AN ITS USE IN CLINICAL TRIALS. , 1965, Biometrics.

[17]  A. Esterman,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Types of In-Shoe Orthoses in Children with Flexible Excess Pronation of the Feet , 2007, Foot & ankle international.

[18]  J. Woodburn,et al.  Observations on the F-Scan in-shoe pressure measuring system. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[19]  M. Hills,et al.  The two-period cross-over clinical trial. , 1979, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[20]  Philippe Terrier,et al.  Prescription footwear for severe injuries of foot and ankle: effect on regularity and symmetry of the gait assessed by trunk accelerometry. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[21]  K. Landorf,et al.  Effectiveness of foot orthoses to treat plantar fasciitis: a randomized trial. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[22]  D C Jones.  Foot orthoses. , 1993, Instructional course lectures.

[23]  S. Pocock,et al.  Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practiceand problems , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Frank A Gottschalk,et al.  AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices. 4th ed. , 2009 .

[25]  A. Rigby.  Cross‐over Trials in Clinical Research , 2003 .

[26]  John D. Hsu,et al.  AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices , 2008 .

[27]  P Paavolainen,et al.  Surgery vs orthosis vs watchful waiting for hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[28]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Splints and Orthosis for treating rheumatoid arthritis , 2001 .

[29]  Joshua Burns,et al.  Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[30]  K. Roach,et al.  Can Foot Orthoses Prevent Hallux Valgus Deformity in Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Randomized Clinical Trial , 1995, Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases.

[31]  Robert B. Anderson,et al.  Comparison of Custom and Prefabricated Orthoses in the Initial Treatment of Proximal Plantar Fasciitis , 1999, Foot & ankle international.

[32]  G. Vidmar,et al.  Reliability of in-shoe plantar pressure measurements in rheumatoid arthritis patients , 2009, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.