Research Traditions, Analysis, and Synthesis in Social Psychological Theories

The decreased attenttion to dissonance theory in present-day social psychology is used to illustrate extratheoretical considerations that influence acceptance of a formulation in the scientific community. The authors suggest that dissonance theory currently receives less attention because its motivational emphasis is outside the core assumptions in the research tradition of the now dominant cognitive orientation They also believe social psychology currently favors an analytic over a synthetic approach to research and theorizing, leading to a decreased interest in "big picture" formulations covering many apparently different domains. The condition-seeking research strategy favored by many investigators is discussed. Although this strategy does not necessarily preclude a synthetic approach, it does encourage condition seeking because of its concern with conditions limiting the operation of a particular phenomenon. Finally, attention is given to other considerations (e.g., desire to be innovative) lessening the field's interest in existing theories.

[1]  C. Steele The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[2]  H. Markus,et al.  THE DYNAMIC SELF-CONCEPT: A Social Psychological Perspective , 1987 .

[3]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Motivational Influences on Impression Formation: Outcome Dependency, Accuracy-Driven Attention, and Individuating Processes , 1987 .

[4]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model , 1987 .

[5]  C. Anderson,et al.  Relocating Motivational Effects: A Synthesis of Cognitive and Motivational Effects on Attributions for Success and Failure , 1986 .

[6]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? , 1986, Psychological review.

[7]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[8]  R. Fazio How do attitudes guide behavior , 1986 .

[9]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[10]  B. Gholson,et al.  Kuhn, Lakatos, and Laudan: Applications in the history of physics and psychology. , 1985 .

[11]  A. Isen,et al.  Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. , 1984 .

[12]  J. Cooper,et al.  A New Look at Dissonance Theory , 1984 .

[13]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[14]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  DISSONANCE PROCESSES AS SELF-AFFIRMATION , 1983 .

[15]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Toward a process model of the attitude-behavior relation: Accessing one's attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. , 1983 .

[16]  William J. McGuire,et al.  A Contextualist Theory of Knowledge: Its Implications for Innovation and Reform in Psychological Research* , 1983 .

[17]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Social psychophysiology : a sourcebook , 1983 .

[18]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association , 1982 .

[19]  P. Linville,et al.  The complexity–extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. , 1982 .

[20]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate , 1982 .

[21]  B. R. Schlenker Translating Actions into Attitudes: An Identity-Analytic Approach to the Explanation of Social Conduct1 , 1982 .

[22]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Is Empathic Emotion a Source of Altruistic Motivation , 1981 .

[23]  D. Hamilton Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior , 1981 .

[24]  John H. Flavell,et al.  Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures , 1981 .

[25]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[26]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[27]  G. W. Bradley Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[28]  L. Ross The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[29]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Altruism as hedonism: a social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[31]  R. A. Wicklund Objective Self-Awareness , 1975 .

[32]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Transgression and Altruism: A Case for Hedonism. , 1973 .

[33]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  The social animal. , 1973 .

[34]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[35]  T. Brock,et al.  Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  A Lowin,et al.  Approach and avoidance: alternate modes of selective exposure to information. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  R. Rhine,et al.  The 1964 presidential election and curves of information seeking and avoiding. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. , 1963 .

[39]  J. Brehm,et al.  Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance , 1962 .

[40]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[41]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[42]  J. Brehm Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[43]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .