Solidarity in STEM: How Gender Composition Affects Women’s Experience in Work Teams

[1]  Yuhsuan Chang,et al.  Team goal orientation composition, team efficacy, and team performance: The separate roles of team leader and members , 2019, Journal of Management & Organization.

[2]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  How Organizational Identity Affects Team Functioning: The Identity Instrumentality Hypothesis , 2018 .

[3]  G. Johns.  Advances in the Treatment of Context in Organizational Research , 2018 .

[4]  Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski,et al.  Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Sapna Cheryan,et al.  Why Are Some STEM Fields More Gender Balanced Than Others? , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Matthew Hunsinger,et al.  Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Daniel B. Wright,et al.  Occupational segregation and psychological gender differences: How empathizing and systemizing help explain the distribution of men and women into (some) occupations , 2015 .

[8]  Dorothy R. Carter,et al.  Mind the gap: The role of leadership in multiteam system collective cognition , 2014 .

[9]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  By Whom and When Is Women’s Expertise Recognized? The Interactive Effects of Gender and Education in Science and Engineering Teams , 2014 .

[10]  M. Burke,et al.  Statistical significance criteria for the rWG and average deviation interrater agreement indices. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  F. Castellucci,et al.  Status in Organization and Management Theory , 2014 .

[12]  Yun Huang,et al.  Understanding the assembly of interdisciplinary teams and its impact on performance , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[13]  L. Greer,et al.  Power and Status in Conflict and Negotiation Research: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2013 .

[14]  Sander Hoogendoorn,et al.  The Impact of Gender Diversity on the Performance of Business Teams: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identification, and follower outcomes ☆ , 2012 .

[16]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[18]  S. Riger,et al.  Feminism and psychology: analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. , 2012, The American psychologist.

[19]  David N. Beede,et al.  Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation , 2011 .

[20]  Anita Williams Woolley,et al.  The role of gender in team collaboration and performance , 2011 .

[21]  A. Woolley,et al.  What makes a team smarter? More women. , 2011, Harvard business review.

[22]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[23]  C. Hill,et al.  Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. , 2010 .

[24]  Anthony J. Nyberg,et al.  Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Do Workgroup Faultlines Help or Hurt? A Moderated Model of Faultlines, Team Identification, and Group Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Gender Stereotypes Are Alive, Well, and Busy Producing Workplace Discrimination , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[27]  Frank Pajares,et al.  A comparative study of the self‐efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers , 2008 .

[28]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Gender Similarities Characterize Math Performance , 2008, Science.

[29]  Alison M. Konrad,et al.  Critical Mass:: The Impact of Three or More Women on Corporate Boards , 2008 .

[30]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[31]  A. Eagly.  Female Leadership Advantage and Disadvantage: Resolving the Contradictions , 2007 .

[32]  G. Seijts,et al.  The development of collective efficacy in teams: a multilevel and longitudinal perspective. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  J. Shih,et al.  Circumventing Discrimination , 2006 .

[34]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  A Tale of Two Methods , 2006 .

[35]  Hema A. Krishnan,et al.  A few good women—on top management teams , 2005 .

[36]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Managing Diversity by Creating Team Identity , 2005 .

[37]  M. Heilman,et al.  No credit where credit is due: attributional rationalization of women's success in male-female teams. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  Benjamin F. Jones.  The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[39]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[40]  Benjamin F. Jones.  The Burden of Knowledge and the 'Death of the Renaissance Man': Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2004 .

[41]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[42]  A. Eagly,et al.  The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence , 2003 .

[43]  B. Metcalfe,et al.  Gendering teamwork: Re-writing the feminine , 2003 .

[44]  C. Barbaranelli,et al.  Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy. , 2002 .

[45]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale , 2001 .

[46]  M. Heilman.  Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. , 2001 .

[47]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  Work Motivation and Performance: A Social Identity Perspective , 2000 .

[48]  James A. Pharmer,et al.  When Member Homogeneity is Needed in Work Teams , 2000 .

[49]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Against the Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers , 2000 .

[50]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[51]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[52]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[53]  P. Bliese.  Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation , 1998 .

[54]  B. Little,et al.  The Relationship between Collective Efficacy and Performance in Manufacturing Work Teams , 1997 .

[55]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  Applications of Self-Efficacy Theory to the Career Assessment of Women , 1997 .

[56]  George B. Graen,et al.  Effects of Team Gender and Racial Composition on Perceptions of Team Performance in Cross-Functional Teams , 1997 .

[57]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[58]  Kathleen Dolan.  Gender differences in support for women candidates: Is there a glass ceiling in American politics? , 1997 .

[59]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  The Differential Impact of Gender Ratios on Women and Men: Tokenism, Self-Confidence, and Expectations , 1995 .

[60]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Efficacy-Performing Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective , 1995 .

[61]  Sophia Catsambis,et al.  Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades , 1995 .

[62]  S. Karau,et al.  Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[63]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[64]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The paradox of critical mass for women in science. , 1994, Science.

[65]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: List of Illustrations , 1994 .

[66]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The paradox of critical mass for women in science. , 1994, Science.

[67]  Keith Oatley,et al.  Gender Issues in Education for Science and Technology: Current Situation and Prospects for Change. , 1993 .

[68]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Gender and the emergence of leaders : a meta-analysis , 1991 .

[69]  Evon M. O. Abu-Taieh,et al.  Comparative Study , 2020, Definitions.

[70]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[71]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[72]  K. Crenshaw.  Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics , 1989 .

[73]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Reporting sex differences. , 1987 .

[74]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[75]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[76]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The Social Relations Model , 1984 .

[77]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[78]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women , 1981 .

[79]  A Y Lewin,et al.  Women in Academia , 1971, Science.