Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data

Analysis of habitat use based on radio-tagged animals presents difficulties inadequately addressed by current methods. Areas of concern are sampling level, data pooling across individuals, non-independence of habitat proportions, differential habitat use by groups of animals, and arbitrary definition of habitat availability. We advocate proportional habitat use by individual animals as a basis for analysis. Hypothesis testing of such nonstandard multivariate data is done by compositional analysis, which encom- passes all MANOVA/MANCOVA-type linear models. The applications to habitat use range from testing for age class effects or seasonal differences, to examining relationships with food abundance or home range size. We take as an example the comparison of habitat use and availability. The concepts are explained and demonstrated on two data sets, illustrating different methods of treating missing values. We compare utilized with available habitats in two stages, examining home range selection within the overall study area first, then habitat use within the home range. At each stage, assuming that use differs from random, habitats can be ranked according to relative use, and significant between-rank differences located. Compositional analysis is also suited to the analysis of time budgets or diets.

[1]  Norman A. Slade,et al.  Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home-range size , 1985 .

[2]  A. E. Ainsley,et al.  Genstat 5 Reference Manual , 1987 .

[3]  D. F. Morrison,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Methods , 1968 .

[4]  G. J. G. Upton,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Modelling , 1983 .

[5]  John Aitchison,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data , 1986 .

[6]  P. Hoel,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. Second Edition. , 1955 .

[7]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[8]  S. Hurlbert.  Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[9]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Measurement of non-circular home range. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  C. O. Mohr,et al.  Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals , 1947 .

[12]  William F. Porter,et al.  Effects of environmental pattern on habitat preference analysis , 1987 .

[13]  John T. Ratti,et al.  Habitat Use and Home Range of Gray Partridge in Eastern South Dakota , 1982 .

[14]  Dennis M. Heisey,et al.  Analyzing Selection Experiments with Log-Linear Models , 1985 .

[15]  S. G. Carmer,et al.  An Evaluation of Ten Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures by Monte Carlo Methods , 1973 .

[16]  M. Friedman.  The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance , 1937 .

[17]  J. R. Alldredge,et al.  Comparison of some statistical techniques for analysis of resource selection , 1986 .

[18]  P. Krausman,et al.  Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data , 1984 .

[19]  J. Wiens.  Pattern and Process in Grassland Bird Communities , 1973 .

[20]  Norman A. Slade,et al.  Testing For Independence of Observations in Animal Movements , 1985 .

[21]  J. Gentle,et al.  Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. , 1990 .

[22]  Clyde W. Neu,et al.  A TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYSIS OF UTILIZATION- AVAILABILITY DATA' , 1974 .

[23]  K. Dixon,et al.  Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas , 1980 .

[24]  D. Quade.  Using Weighted Rankings in the Analysis of Complete Blocks with Additive Block Effects , 1979 .

[25]  B. Worton.  Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[26]  Stephen Harris,et al.  Home‐range analysis using radio‐tracking data–a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals , 1990 .