Alternative stable states and regional community structure.

Many models of local species interactions predict the occurrence of priority effects due to alternative stable equilibria (ASE). However, few empirical examples of ASE have been shown. One possible explanation for the disparity is that local ASE are difficult to maintain regionally in patch dynamic models. Here we examine two possible mechanisms for regional coexistence of species engaged in local ASE. Biotically generated heterogeneity (e.g., habitat modification that favors further invasion by conspecifics) results in regional exclusion of one species at equilibrium. In contrast, abiotic heterogeneity due to spatial variation in resource supply ratios generates local-scale ASE and ensures regional coexistence with sufficiently broad environmental gradients. Abiotic heterogeneity can result in a species that is the dominant competitor over some of its range being excluded if the area where it is dominant is too small. Biotic heterogeneity can lead to alternative stable landscapes or regional priority effects, while abiotic heterogeneity results in regional determinism. Broad environmental gradients in resource supply favor regional coexistence of species that exhibit local ASE.

[1]  N. Knowlton.  Thresholds and Multiple Stable States in Coral Reef Community Dynamics , 1992 .

[2]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Multiple domains of attraction in competition communities , 1976, Nature.

[3]  Jonathan M. Chase.  Experimental evidence for alternative stable equilibria in a benthic pond food web , 2003 .

[4]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Floating plant dominance as a stable state , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Holly T. Dublin,et al.  Elephants and Fire as Causes of Multiple Stable States in the Serengeti-Mara Woodlands , 1990 .

[6]  S. Diehl,et al.  Effects of Enrichment on Three‐Level Food Chains with Omnivory , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[7]  R. Holt.  Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives.Robert E. Ricklefs , Dolph Schluter , 1995 .

[9]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  7 – From Metapopulation Dynamics to Community Structure: Some Consequences of Spatial Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[10]  J. Sutherland,et al.  Multiple Stable Points in Natural Communities , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Plant tolerance and resistance in food webs: community-level predictions and evolutionary implications , 2000, Evolutionary Ecology.

[12]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  PARTITIONING THE EFFECTS OF PLANT BIOMASS AND LITTER ON ANDROPOGON GERARDI IN OLD-FIELD VEGETATION , 1997 .

[13]  Andrew D. Taylor,et al.  Empirical Evidence for Metapopulation Dynamics , 1997 .

[14]  P. Petraitis,et al.  The importance of scale in testing the origins of alternative community states , 1999 .

[15]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis , 1982 .

[17]  R. Paine,et al.  Intertidal community structure , 1974, Oecologia.

[18]  M. Bowler,et al.  Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees , 2002, Nature.

[19]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[20]  C. Heip,et al.  Do alternate stable states occur in natural ecosystems?: Evidence from a tidal flat , 2001 .

[21]  L. Gunderson.  Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application , 2000 .

[22]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[23]  P. Petraitis,et al.  Experimental evidence for the origin of alternative communities on rocky intertidal shores , 1999 .

[24]  J. Bergelson.  Life After Death: Site Pre‐Emption by the Remains of Poa Annua , 1990 .

[25]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  The Competition‐Colonization Trade‐off Is Dead; Long Live the Competition‐Colonization Trade‐off , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[26]  J. Connell,et al.  On the Evidence Needed to Judge Ecological Stability or Persistence , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[27]  W. Laycock.  Stable states and thresholds of range condition on North American rangelands: a viewpoint. , 1991 .

[28]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Food webs in space: On the interplay of dynamic instability and spatial processes , 2002, Ecological Research.

[29]  Jonathan M. Chase.  Food Web Effects of Prey Size Refugia: Variable Interactions and Alternative Stable Equilibria , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[30]  R. Levins,et al.  Regional Coexistence of Species and Competition between Rare Species. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Top‐Down Control of Cyanobacteria: A Theoretical Analysis , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[32]  James P. Grover,et al.  Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[33]  Notes and Comments Self-Organization of Vegetation in Arid Ecosystems , 2002 .

[34]  William M. Schaffer,et al.  Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities , 1989 .

[35]  M. Bertness,et al.  DO ALTERNATE STABLE COMMUNITY STATES EXIST IN THE GULF OF MAINE ROCKY INTERTIDAL ZONE , 2002 .

[36]  J. Grover.  Resource Competition , 1997, Population and Community Biology Series.

[37]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Intraguild Predation , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[38]  A. D. de Roos,et al.  Impact of Intraguild Predation and Stage Structure on Simple Communities along a Productivity Gradient , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[39]  D. Taneyhill.  METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS OF MULTIPLE SPECIES: THE GEOMETRY OF COMPETITION IN A FRAGMENTED HABITAT , 2000 .

[40]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[41]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change , 1992 .

[42]  P. Chesson,et al.  Environmental Variability Promotes Coexistence in Lottery Competitive Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.