Pricing and Product-bundling Strategies for E-commerce Platforms with Competition

Abstract We consider pricing and product-bundling strategies for two competing platforms with two groups of agents, customers and sellers (independent content developers). In this paper, two such groups are required to pay the platforms fixed (subscription) fees to gain access; each platform also produces its own integrated content. We investigate the impacts of installed base, mixed bundling, and competition on the platforms’ pricing and product-bundling strategies. We find that in the presence of both installed base and competition, each platform will charge sellers the same fee, regardless of whether the unbundling or mixed-bundling strategy is chosen. However, if the mixed-bundling strategy is used, the prices charged to customers may be higher relative to the unbundling equilibrium. Importantly, our results reveal that the mixed product-bundling strategy can be used as a strategic competitive tool for the competing platforms to seize more market share and induce the platforms to subsidize customers who buy the bundle by charging customers who only access the platforms (without bundling) a higher price. Moreover, we find that the proposed mixed product-bundling strategy is a dominant equilibrium solution for two competing platforms. We also show that under certain conditions, the mixed-bundling strategy can always bring larger value for both platforms if the intrinsic value of the integrated content (the fractions of the installed base) becomes smaller (higher) relative to the unbundling strategy. These results offer valuable implications for relevant practices.

[1]  Nan Feng,et al.  Intertemporal mixed bundling strategy of information products with network externality , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[2]  J. Choi Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Multi-Homing , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  Yong Chao,et al.  Mixed Bundling in Two-Sided Markets in the Presence of Installed Base Effects , 2012 .

[4]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[5]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[6]  B. Nalebuff Bundling as an Entry Barrier , 2004 .

[7]  B. Jullien,et al.  Tying and freebies in two-sided markets , 2007 .

[8]  Simon P. Anderson,et al.  The Logit as a Model of Product Differentiation: Further Results and Extensions , 1989 .

[9]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Gaussian Demand and Commodity Bundling , 1984 .

[10]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .

[11]  Harold Winter,et al.  Pure vs. mixed commodity bundling , 1996 .

[12]  Maciej Sobolewski,et al.  Bundling or unbundling? Integrated simulation model of optimal pricing strategies , 2018, International Journal of Production Economics.

[13]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Product bundling or reserved product pricing? Price discrimination with myopic and strategic consumers , 2015 .

[14]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[15]  V. Mahajan,et al.  The design and pricing of bundles: A review of normative guidelines and practical approaches , 2009 .

[16]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Chapter 2 Explanatory and predictive models of consumer behavior , 1993, Marketing.

[17]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Mixed Bundling of Two Independently Valued Goods , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Chung-Piaw Teo,et al.  Persistency Model and Its Applications in Choice Modeling , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Adriana Vamosiu,et al.  Compatibility and bundling of stand and No stand-alone use complements , 2018, International Journal of Production Economics.

[20]  M. Peitz Bundling may blockade entry ☆ , 2007 .

[21]  Xiaobo Li,et al.  On Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Marginal Distribution Choice Models , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Zhong Yao,et al.  Pricing strategies for information products with network effects and complementary services in a duopolistic market , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[23]  Janet L. Yellen,et al.  Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly , 1976 .

[24]  Adriana Vamosiu,et al.  Optimal bundling under imperfect competition , 2018 .

[25]  Doh-Shin Jeon,et al.  A Leverage Theory of Tying in Two-Sided Markets , 2016, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics.

[26]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[27]  Amiya K. Chakravarty,et al.  Bundling decisions in supply chains , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Thomas D. Jeitschko,et al.  Homogeneous platform competition with endogenous homing , 2014 .

[29]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Aggregation and Imperfect Competition: On the Existence of Equilibrium , 1991 .

[30]  Mihai Banciu,et al.  Optimal product bundling with dependent valuations: The price of independence , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Markus Reisinger Two-Part Tariff Competition between Two-Sided Platforms , 2014 .

[32]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Installed base management versus selling in monopolistic and competitive environments , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Minghua Chen,et al.  Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model , 2016, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[34]  Hanna Halaburda,et al.  Platform Competition Under Asymmetric Information , 2012 .

[35]  Shyamal Kumar Mondal,et al.  Bundle pricing strategies for two complementary products with different channel powers , 2020, Ann. Oper. Res..

[36]  Ming Gao,et al.  Platform Pricing in Mixed Two‐Sided Markets , 2017 .

[37]  Sun Keke,et al.  Bundling, Vertical Differentiation, and Platform Competition , 2018 .

[38]  G. Stigler United States v. Loew's Inc.: A Note on Block-Booking , 1963, The Supreme Court Review.

[39]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Optimal Bundling of Technological Products with Network Externality , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[40]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers , 2003 .