Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane

We investigated optic and somesthetic contributions to perceived body orientation in the pitch dimension. In a within-subject factorial design, each of 12 subjects attempted to set his/her body erect or 45° back from erect while restrained in a movable bed surrounded by an adjustable box The box provided a visual environment consisting of either a grid pattern, two luminous lines, or complete darkness. Both the grid pattern and the luminous lines were effective at-biasing settings of body position when the box was pitched; the pitched grid was more effective than the pitched lines. Although the pitch of the box influenced orientation to both goals, the effect was greater for the diagonal goal than for the erect goal. We present a model of postural orientation in the median plane that involves vestibular, somatosensory, and visual inputs.

[1]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[2]  F E Guedry,et al.  Observations on perceived changes in aircraft attitude attending head movements made in a 2-g bank and turn. , 1973, Aerospace medicine.

[3]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  The relative effect of saccular and somatosensory information on spatial perception and control. , 1988, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[4]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  S. Geisser,et al.  An Extension of Box's Results on the Use of the $F$ Distribution in Multivariate Analysis , 1958 .

[6]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants , 1974 .

[7]  H. A. Witkin.  Perception of body position and of the position of the visual field. , 1949 .

[8]  H. Pick,et al.  Visual capture produced by prism spectacles , 1965 .

[9]  L. Nashner.  A model describing vestibular detection of body sway motion. , 1971, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[11]  M Flannagan,et al.  Subjective Estimates of Body Tilt and the Rod-and-Frame Test , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  Cohen Mm.  Disorienting effects of aircraft catapult launchings: III. Cockpit displays and piloting performance. , 1977 .

[13]  G E PASSEY,et al.  The perception of the vertical. IV. Adjustment to the vertical with normal and tilted visual frames of reference. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  I. Howard,et al.  Human Spatial Orientation , 1966 .

[15]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[16]  Leonard Matin,et al.  Visual Localization and Eye Movements , 1982 .

[17]  Malcolm M. Cohen,et al.  Human spatial orientation in the pitch dimension , 1974 .

[18]  William B. Templeton,et al.  The role of gravitational cues in the judgment of visual orientation , 1973 .

[19]  R. D. Kavanaugh,et al.  Intratest and Sex Differences on a Portable Rod-and-Frame Test , 1971, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  L A KNIGHT,et al.  An approach to the physiologic simulation of the null-gravity state. , 1958, The Journal of aviation medicine.

[21]  E. Brunswik.  Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[23]  L R Young,et al.  Influence of head orientation on visually induced pitch and roll sensation. , 1975, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[24]  S. Ebenholtz,et al.  Determinants of the rod-and-frame effect: Role of organization and subjective contour , 1980 .

[25]  Norbert Bischof,et al.  Optic-Vestibular Orientation to the Vertical , 1974 .

[26]  Comparing the Variances of Several Treatments With a Control , 1975 .

[27]  J A Perrone,et al.  Visual slant misperception and the 'black-hole' landing situation. , 1984, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[28]  H. Mittelstaedt.  The subjective vertical as a function of visual and extraretinal cues. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[29]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  G. Singer,et al.  The effect of structure and degree of tilt on the tilted room illusion , 1970 .

[31]  Herman A. Witkin,et al.  Personality through perception , 1954 .

[32]  E. Eng,et al.  Personality Through Perception. An Experimental and Clinical Study.H. A Witkin, H. B. Lewis , M. Hertzman , K. Machover , P. Bretnall Meissner , S. Wapner , 1954 .

[33]  C. R. Fox,et al.  Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity , 1989, Vision Research.

[34]  J P Kerwin,et al.  Weightlessness: a case history. , 1975, Acta astronautica.

[35]  P. Games.  A three-factor model encompassing many possible statistical tests on independent groups. , 1978 .

[36]  D. Goodenough,et al.  The rod-and-frame illusion in erect and supine observers , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[38]  Horst Mittelstaedt.  Subjective vertical in weightlessness , 1985 .

[39]  Sheldon M. Ebenholtz,et al.  Determinants of the rod and frame effect: The role of retinal size , 1977 .

[40]  A GRAYBIEL,et al.  PERCEPTION OF THE POSTURAL VERTICAL FOLLOWING PROLONGED BODILY TILT IN NORMALS AND SUBJECTS WITH LABYRINTHINE DEFECTS. , 1964, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[41]  T A Stoffregen,et al.  The role of optical velocity in the control of stance , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Induced self-motion in central vision. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Eric Sigman,et al.  Instructions, Illusory Self-Tilt and the Rod-and-Frame Test , 1979 .

[44]  Ma Gresty,et al.  Vestibular and Visual Control on Posture and Locomotor Equilibrium , 1986 .

[45]  J. G. Nelson.  Effect of water immersion and body position upon perception of the gravitational vertical. , 1968, Aerospace medicine.

[46]  S. Lechner-Steinleitner,et al.  The subjective vertical under ‘dry’ and ‘wet’ conditions at clockwise and counterclockwise changed positions and the effect of a parallel-lined background field , 1980, Psychological research.

[47]  H. Nyborg.  TACTILE STIMULATION AND PERCEPTION OF THE VERTICAL , 1971 .

[48]  L Matin,et al.  Visually perceived eye level: changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  F B Baker,et al.  Estimates of test size for several test procedures based on conventional variance ratios in the repeated measures design , 1967, Psychometrika.

[50]  A GRAYBIEL,et al.  Perception of the postural vertical in normals and subjects with labyrinthine defects. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  Conrad L. Kraft.  A Psychophysical Contribution to Air Safety: Simulator Studies of Visual Illusions in Night Visual Approaches , 1978 .

[52]  M M Cohen,et al.  Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  H. Nyborg.  Tactile stimulation and perception of the vertical. I. Effects of diffuse vs. specific tactile stimulation. , 1971, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[54]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[55]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  Sheldon M. Ebenholtz,et al.  The rod and frame effect and induced head tilt as a function of observation distance , 1977 .

[57]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  An ecological theory of orientation and the vestibular system. , 1988, Psychological review.