Perspective changing in primary and secondary learning: A gender difference study

Abstract In the present study, we investigated the ability of 106 (55 males, 51 females) college students to recall an 8-step path from different viewpoints (0°; 90°; 180° and 270°) after primary and secondary learning without a time limit. For each participant, we computed the time and number of repetitions necessary to learn the path as well as his/her spatial style (landmark, route and survey) using the “Questionnaire on Spatial Representation” (Pazzaglia & De Beni, 2001). We found gender differences in secondary but not in primary learning. Our results support the hypothesis that gender differences emerge only in adverse learning conditions requiring strong spatial ability. Moreover, we observed that computing an individual learning time as well as the specific number of repetitions necessary to learn the environment reduced markedly the presence of individual differences, stressing the importance of the expertise effect in the environmental learning.

[1]  M. Sholl,et al.  Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments. , 2005, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[2]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Orientation Specificity in Representations of Place , 1997 .

[4]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Orientation specificity in spatial memory: what makes a path different from a map of the path? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Selective influence of prior allocentric knowledge on the kinesthetic learning of a path , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  J. Paillard.  Brain and space , 1991 .

[7]  Tina Iachini,et al.  Object localisation and frames of reference , 2004, Cognitive Processing.

[8]  T. McNamara,et al.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory , 2002 .

[9]  A. Longoni,et al.  Hand Preference in an Italian Sample , 1983, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  E. Coluccia,et al.  Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review , 2004 .

[11]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Changing perspective within and across environments , 2003, Cognition.

[12]  Lorin J. Elias,et al.  Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies , 2002 .

[13]  R. D. Easton,et al.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Matt J. Rossano,et al.  Orientation Specificity: How General Is It? , 1995 .

[15]  M. Blades,et al.  Relations Between Psychology and Geography , 1997 .

[16]  Tina Iachini,et al.  The effects of familiarity and gender on spatial representation , 2009 .

[17]  Y A Féry,et al.  Attenuation of Alignment Effect with Exocentric Encoding of Location , 2000, Perception.

[18]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals. , 2001 .

[20]  C. Lawton.  STRATEGIES FOR INDOOR WAYFINDING: THE ROLE OF ORIENTATION , 1996 .

[21]  Raffaella Nori,et al.  Cognitive Styles: Errors in Directional Judgments , 2003, Perception.

[22]  Raffaella Nori,et al.  Alignment Effect: Primary – Secondary Learning and Cognitive Styles , 2006, Perception.

[23]  Raffaella Nori,et al.  FAMILIARITY AND SPATIAL COGNITIVE STYLE: HOW IMPORTANT ARE THEY FOR SPATIAL REPRESENTATION? , 2011 .

[24]  D. Halpern.  Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[25]  G W Evans,et al.  Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[26]  M. Sholl,et al.  The role of self-to-object updating in orientation-free performance on spatial-memory tasks. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  E. Coluccia,et al.  The relationship between map drawing and spatial orientation abilities: A study of gender differences , 2007 .

[28]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Philip M. Corsi.  Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. , 1972 .

[30]  C. Lawton.  Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety , 1994 .

[31]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Multisensory integration in spatial orientation , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[32]  G. Iaria,et al.  Walking in the Corsi test: Which type of memory do you need? , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  C C Presson,et al.  Updating after Rotational and Translational Body Movements: Coordinate Structure of Perspective Space , 1994, Perception.