The signal value of birdsong: empirical evidence suggests song overlapping is a signal

Please cite this article in press as: Naguib, a signal, Animal Behaviour (2010), doi:10.10 Birdsong is among the most well-studied communication systems in vertebrates and provides many textbook examples in animal behaviour, ecology and evolution. Owing to the substantial body of research dealing with this topic, and the numerous research groups focusing on different aspects of birdsong, it is often difficult to maintain an overview across the discipline. An increasing number of reviews on various aspects of birdsong provide important syntheses (Todt & Naguib 2000; Vehrencamp 2000; Gil & Gahr 2002; Beecher & Brenowitz 2005; Catchpole & Slater 2008). The recent review by Searcy & Beecher (2009) makes a valuable contribution by bringing together a substantial body of research on the territorial function of birdsong with a specific focus on singing contests. The review covers a large body of research and critically discusses the evidence that certain components of singing contests act as aggressive signals. Furthermore, it places many ideas in a context that will stimulate researchers to conduct more advanced studies and to plan carefully which behavioural responses to measure.

[1]  Valentin Amrhein,et al.  Dawn singing reflects past territorial challenges in the winter wren , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  M. Hall,et al.  Overlapping signals in banded wrens: long-term effects of prior experience on males and females. , 2006, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[3]  G. Leboucher,et al.  Is he all he says he is? Intersexual eavesdropping in the domestic canary, Serinus canaria , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  F. Wasserman Intraspecific acoustical interference in the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  Signal Detection and Animal Communication , 2006 .

[6]  R. W. Ficken,et al.  Avoidance of acoustic interference by Ovenbirds , 1985 .

[7]  M. Naguib,et al.  Vocal Interactions in Birds: The Use of Song as a Model in Communication , 2000 .

[8]  M. Naguib,et al.  The day after: effects of vocal interactions on territory defence in nightingales. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[9]  J. Waas,et al.  'LAST WORD' EFFECTS OF MALE ADVERTISING CALLS ON FEMALE PREFERENCE IN LITTLE BLUE PENGUINS , 2002 .

[10]  Valentin Amrhein,et al.  Long-term influence of simulated territorial intrusions on dawn and dusk singing in the Winter Wren: spring versus autumn , 2008, Journal of Ornithology.

[11]  M. Gochfeld Intraspecific Social Stimulation and Temporal Displacement of Songs of the Lesser Skylark, Alauda gulgula , 2010 .

[12]  Emma L. Brindley,et al.  Response of European robins to playback of song: neighbour recognition and overlapping , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  G. Leboucher,et al.  Eavesdropping on Male Singing Interactions Leads to Differential Allocation in Eggs , 2010 .

[14]  D. Todt On Functions of Vocal Matching: Effect of Counter‐replies on Song Post Choice and Singing , 2010 .

[15]  P. McGregor,et al.  The signal function of overlapping singing in male robins , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Chapter 1 Environmental Acoustics and the Evolution of Bird Song , 2009 .

[17]  M. Naguib,et al.  Responses to interactive playback predict future pairing success in nightingales , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  D. Mennill,et al.  Overlapping and matching in the song contests of black-capped chickadees , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Erin R. B. Eldermire,et al.  The deterrent effect of bird song in territory defense. , 2009, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[20]  R. W. Ficken,et al.  Short-term temporal avoidance of interspecific acoustic interference among forest birds , 1985 .

[21]  G. Leboucher,et al.  Effects of Eavesdropping on Subsequent Signalling Behaviours in Male Canaries , 2009 .

[22]  William A. Searcy,et al.  Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  T. Grafe A function of synchronous chorusing and a novel female preference shift in an anuran , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Anastasia H Dalziell,et al.  Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the banded wren: the sender's perspective. , 2007, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[25]  T. Osiejuk,et al.  Signal value of alternating and overlapping singing in the Yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella , 2004, Journal of Ethology.

[26]  M. Naguib,et al.  Vocal interactions in nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos: more aggressive males have higher pairing success , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Synchronous and Alternating Choruses in Insects and Anurans: Common Mechanisms and Diverse Functions , 1994 .

[28]  W. F. V. Dongen Variation in singing behaviour reveals possible functions of song in male golden whistlers , 2006 .

[29]  Peter de Goede,et al.  Effects of personality on territory defence in communication networks: a playback experiment with radio-tagged great tits , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  Cocktail–party effect in king penguin colonies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Male chickadees match neighbors interactively at dawn: support for the social dynamics hypothesis , 2008 .

[32]  Valentin Amrhein,et al.  Differential effects of moving versus stationary territorial intruders on territory defence in a songbird. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[33]  M. Naguib,et al.  Communication across territory boundaries: distance-dependent responses in nightingales , 2010 .

[34]  Manfred Gahr,et al.  The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits , 2002 .

[35]  R. H. Wiley Bird Song, Biological Themes and Variations C. K. Catchpole P. J. B. Slater , 1996 .

[36]  Angelika Poesel,et al.  Territorial responses of male blue tits to simulated dynamic intrusions: effects of song overlap and intruder location , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  P. McGregor,et al.  Do great tits assess rivals by combining direct experience with information gathered by eavesdropping? , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  M. Théry,et al.  Female canary mate preferences: differential use of information from two types of male–male interaction , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  P. McGregor,et al.  Is the signal value of overlapping different from that of alternating during matched singing in Great Tits , 1996 .

[41]  M. Naguib Effects of song overlapping and alternating on nocturnally singing nightingales , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  M. Naguib,et al.  Vocal interactions in common nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): males take it easy after pairing , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  D. Mennill,et al.  Do male black-capped chickadees eavesdrop on song contests? A multi-speaker playback experiment , 2004 .

[44]  P. McGregor,et al.  Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male–to–male vocal interactions , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Frequency matching, overlapping and movement behaviour in diurnal countersinging interactions of black-capped chickadees , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations , 1995 .

[47]  Daniel J Mennill,et al.  Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. , 2002, Science.

[48]  M. Naguib,et al.  Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  P. McGregor,et al.  RESPONSE OF GREAT TITS TO ESCALATING PATTERNS OF PLAYBACK , 2000 .

[50]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Effects of different levels of song overlapping on singing behaviour in male territorial nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos) , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[51]  D. Todt,et al.  Temporal performance roles during vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos B.) , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[52]  D. Blumstein Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[53]  J. Hailman,et al.  Temporal Pattern Shifts to Avoid Acoustic Interference in Singing Birds , 1974, Science.

[54]  T. Osiejuk,et al.  Corn bunting (Miliaria calandra) males respond differently to alternating and overlapping playback of song , 2007, Journal of Ethology.

[55]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Eavesdropping and communication networks revealed through playback and an acoustic location system , 2008 .