Extended Morphological Profile-based Gabor Wavelets for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Hyperspectral image acquired by a hyperspectral sensor contains hundred of narrow contiguous spectral bands, since the spatial distribution of surface materials generally exhibits high regularity and local continuity, spatial texture information should be introduced to improve the classification accuracy of hyperspectral image. The extended morphological profiles (EMP) have been created from the raw hyperspectral image, which has proven to be effective and robust of reflecting the spatial structural features of hyperspectral data. In the meanwhile, because the three-dimensional (3D) Gabor wavelets have been introduced to exploit the joint spectral-spatial features of hyperspectral image. In this paper, for the purpose of combining the advantages of the EMP operator and Gabor wavelet transform together, an extended morphological profile-based Gabor wavelets, which is named as EMP-Gabor, has been proposed for hyperspectral image classification. Definitely, to compute principal components of the hyperspectral image, the most significant principal components are used as base images for an extended morphological profile, and the EMP features can be thus obtained. Secondly, 3D Gabor wavelets with particular orientations are directly convolved with the EMP feature cube. Finally, support vector machine (SVM) classifier is utilized to carry out the classification task. Experimental results on two real hyperspectral data sets have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed EMP-Gabor framework for hyperspectral image classification over several state-of-the-art methods.

[1]  Guangyi Chen,et al.  Denoising of Hyperspectral Imagery Using Principal Component Analysis and Wavelet Shrinkage , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  M. Salman Asif,et al.  Dynamic compressive sensing: sparse recovery algorithms for streaming signals and video , 2013 .

[3]  LinLin Shen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Gabor Wavelets for Pixel-Based Hyperspectral Imagery Classification , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  J. Chanussot,et al.  Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data Analysis and Future Challenges , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[5]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Advances in Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Images , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[7]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Multiple Feature Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Processing for Automatic Target Detection Applications , 2003 .

[9]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Investigation of the random forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  A comparative assessment of several processing chains for hyperspectral image classification: What features to use? , 2011, 2011 3rd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[11]  Shigeo Abe Support Vector Machines for Pattern Classification , 2010, Advances in Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Classification and feature extraction for remote sensing images from urban areas based on morphological transformations , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  Glenn Healey,et al.  Hyperspectral Region Classification Using a Three-Dimensional Gabor Filterbank , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Maryam Imani,et al.  Feature Extraction Using Attraction Points for Classification of Hyperspectral Images in a Small Sample Size Situation , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[15]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[17]  LinLin Shen,et al.  3D Gabor wavelets for evaluating SPM normalization algorithm , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[19]  Qingquan Li,et al.  A Two-Stage Feature Selection Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Few Labeled Samples , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  Remote sensing, models, and methods for image processing , 1997 .

[21]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Generalized Composite Kernel Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles , 2008, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[23]  D. Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information , 1946 .

[24]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing , 2009 .

[25]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Kernel Principal Component Analysis for the Classification of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data over Urban Areas , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[26]  Jiang Li,et al.  Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral data using discrete wavelet transform feature extraction , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..