A Study of Sexual Dimorphism in the Femur Among North Indians *

Abstract:  Determination of sex of unknown skeleton remains is the most important step in the identification process. Racial and regional differences in the populations create and maintain specificity in their dimorphic characteristics. Moreover, considering continued secular changes in the population structure, constant revision of osteometric standards becomes mandatory. In an effort to establish osteometric standards for the femur of contemporary North Indian populations, 122 adult femora of known sex (M: 94; F: 28) were collected in the Department of Forensic Medicine, IMS, BHU, Varanasi. Eight standard parameters were measured and analyzed by discriminant function analysis using SPSS 16. The accuracy of sex prediction ranged from 70.5% to 83.6% with single variables. In stepwise analysis, epicondylar breadth, proximal breadth, and antero‐posterior diameter of the lateral condyle were found to be the most discriminating variables providing an accuracy of 90.2%. The results clearly indicate the importance of the ends of femur in the determination of sex.

[1]  P. Igbigbi,et al.  Sex determination from femoral head diameters in black Malawians. , 2009, East African medical journal.

[2]  D. Frayer.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM , 2005 .

[3]  M Graw,et al.  Determination of sex from femora. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[4]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the Chinese femur. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[5]  K. Krishan.  Determination of Stature From Foot and Its Segments in a North Indian Population , 2008, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[6]  John Albanese,et al.  A Metric Method for Sex Determination Using the Proximal Femur and Fragmentary Hipbone *,† , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  Linda L. Klepinger,et al.  Fundamentals of Forensic Anthropology , 2006 .

[8]  R. Purkait.  Measurements of ulna--a new method for determination of sex. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  M. Šlaus.  Discriminant function sexing of fragmentary and complete femora from medieval sites in continental Croatia , 1997 .

[10]  J Dittrick,et al.  Sex determination of prehistoric central California skeletal remains using discriminant analysis of the femur and humerus. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[11]  Nikolaos Vorniotakis,et al.  Sex identification and software development using digital femoral head radiographs. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[12]  L. Humphrey,et al.  Growth patterns in the modern human skeleton. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  K. Katayama,et al.  Sex determination using the femur in an ancient Japanese population. , 2008, Collegium Antropologicum.

[14]  Tanja Göbel,et al.  Metric Assessment of the “Mastoid Triangle” for Sex Determination: A Validation Study , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  L. Wu,et al.  Sex determination of Chinese femur by discriminant function. , 1989, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  G Quatrehomme,et al.  Sex determination from the distal part of the femur in a French contemporary population. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[17]  G. Doran,et al.  The use of the supero-inferior femoral neck diameter as a sex assessor. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  A. Casinos,et al.  Lumbar ontogenetic growth and sexual dimorphism in modern humans , 2010, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[19]  S. Asala,et al.  The efficiency of the demarking point of the femoral head as a sex determining parameter. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[20]  Ahmet Harma,et al.  Determination of sex from the femur in Anatolian Caucasians: a digital radiological study. , 2007, Journal of forensic and legal medicine.

[21]  G. Trancho,et al.  Sexual determination of the femur using discriminant functions. Analysis of a Spanish population of known sex and age. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[22]  K. Abbasi,et al.  The World Bank and world health: focus on South Asia-II: India and Pakistan. , 1999, BMJ.

[23]  C. A. King,et al.  Metric and comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Thai femur. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[24]  Ruma Purkait,et al.  A study of sexual variation in Indian femur. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[25]  Ruma Purkait,et al.  Triangle identified at the proximal end of femur: a new sex determinant. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[26]  J. Rich,et al.  Forensic medicine of the lower extremity : human identification and trauma analysis of the thigh, leg, and foot , 2005 .

[27]  W. M. Krogman.  The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[28]  H. Mchenry,et al.  The femur in early human evolution. , 1978, American journal of physical anthropology.

[29]  D. Ubelaker,et al.  Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains , 1994 .

[30]  L. Klepinger.  Fundamentals of Forensic Anthropology: Klepinger/Fundamentals of Forensic Anthropology , 2006 .

[31]  T. Kanchan,et al.  Sexual dimorphism of the human sternum in a Maharashtrian population of India: a morphometric analysis. , 2008, Legal medicine.

[32]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Sex determination from the femur and tibia in South African whites. , 1997, Forensic science international.

[33]  G Quatrehomme,et al.  Reexamination of a measurement for sexual determination using the supero-inferior femoral neck diameter in a modern European population. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[34]  Mubarak Ariyo Bidmos,et al.  The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[35]  A. Rosas,et al.  A geometric-morphometric study of the Cretan humerus for sex identification. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[36]  C. Stojanowski,et al.  A reevaluation of the sex prediction accuracy of the minimum supero-inferior femoral neck diameter for modern individuals. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[37]  N. Tatarek,et al.  Anthropological Analysis of the Lower Extremity , 2005 .

[38]  R. Purkait.  Sex determination from femoral head measurements: a new approach. , 2003, Legal medicine.

[39]  Isabelle Linda Odile Barrier,et al.  Sex determination from the bones of the forearm in a modern South African sample , 2008 .

[40]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Sex determination from the tibia: standards for contemporary Japan. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.

[41]  T. K. Black,et al.  A new method for assessing the sex of fragmentary skeletal remains: femoral shaft circumference. , 1978, American journal of physical anthropology.

[42]  Margaret Cox,et al.  Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science , 2000 .

[43]  J V Taylor,et al.  Multiple discriminant function analysis of sex and race in the postcranial skeleton. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[44]  L. Scheuer.  Application of osteology to forensic medicine , 2002, Clinical anatomy.

[45]  I. Jit,et al.  The sexing of the adult clavicles. , 1966, The Indian journal of medical research.

[46]  K. Sakaue.  Sexual determination of long bones in recent Japanese , 2004 .