Electronic Commerce "in the dark"

The widespread diffusion of electronic commerce offers a great opportunity for blind people. We describe the results of an electronic survey carried out with 22 blind and 22 sighted users in order to understand the difficulties and obstacles they experience shopping on-line, and solicit their expectations and suggestions for making the interaction simpler and more satisfying. Results show that blind users shop on-line much less than their sighted counterparts, since they encounter more difficulties not only when making a purchase, but even in the navigation phase preceding the commercial transaction. Complex layouts and unstructured content can prevent an e-transaction from being successfully completed. Furthermore, security, privacy and trustiness, common concerns for all consumers, also impact on the fear of buying via Internet for the visually impaired. Poor usability leads to a potential loss of revenue for online companies and a lost opportunity to increase a blind person's independence. Providing simpler, more understandable UIs would benefit all users and fuel the expansion of electronic commerce.

[1]  Wolfgang L. Zagler,et al.  Computers Helping People with Special Needs, 12th International Conference, ICCHP 2010, Vienna, Austria, July 14-16, 2010, Proceedings, Part II , 2010, ICCHP.

[2]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Hunting for headings: sighted labeling vs. automatic classification of headings , 2008, Assets '08.

[3]  Florian N. Egger,et al.  "Trust me, I'm an online vendor": towards a model of trust for e-commerce system design , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Usability and Accessibility of eBay by Screen Reader , 2009, USAB.

[5]  Helen Petrie,et al.  Tension, what tension?: Website accessibility and visual design , 2003, W4A '04.

[6]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  User Trust in eCommerce Services: Perception via Screen Reader , 2009, 2009 International Conference on New Trends in Information and Service Science.

[7]  Claudio S. Pinhanez A service science perspective for interfaces of online service applications , 2008, IHC.

[8]  Helen Petrie,et al.  Sex, lies and web accessibility: the use of accessibility logos and statements on e-commerce and financial websites , 2005 .

[9]  Zhilin Yang,et al.  Asymmetrical impact of trustworthiness attributes on trust, perceived value and purchase intention: a conceptual framework for cross-cultural study on consumer perception of online auction , 2003, ICEC '03.

[10]  Melody Y. Ivory,et al.  Search result exploration: a preliminary study of blind and sighted users' decision making and performance , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[11]  Keith Gladstone,et al.  Accessibility and Usability of eCommerce Systems , 2002, ICCHP.

[12]  A. Conchon,et al.  Applications and services , 2001 .

[13]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[14]  Qiang Ye,et al.  The Impact of Seller Reputation on the Performance of online sales: evidence from TaoBao buy-it-now (BIN) data , 2009, DATB.

[15]  Michael Stenitzer,et al.  Accessible Online Shops for the Older Generation and People with Disabilities , 2008, ICCHP.

[16]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Trust online , 2000, CACM.

[17]  Peter Brophy,et al.  Non-Visual Access to the Digital Library (NoVA): The Use of the Digital Library Interfaces by Blind and Visually Impaired People , 2003 .

[18]  Matjaz Debevc,et al.  How Can HCI Factors Improve Accessibility of m-Learning for Persons with Special Needs? , 2007, HCI.

[19]  Mauricio Featherman,et al.  The intangibility of e-services: effects on perceived risk and acceptance , 2010, DATB.

[20]  Klaus Miesenberger,et al.  HCI and Usability for e-Inclusion, 5th Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society, USAB 2009, Linz, Austria, November 9-10, 2009 Proceedings , 2009, USAB.

[21]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction , 2011 .