Emergence of pediatric rare diseases

In this article we discuss the steps taken by the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) to meet the health care needs of children with rare diseases and suggest possible directions for future endeavors for further improvement. We reviewed 23 reports and nine legislative documents related to pediatric rare diseases and public policy. We assessed the outcome measures of access and satisfaction with medical services by utilizing the surveys done by the European Organization for Rare Diseases -Eurordis (n = 5,963). Comparable surveys were not available in the US. Our analyses of the existing policies and surveys indicate multiple differences between the US and EU. While the US policies seem to be aimed at disease diagnosis and neonatal screening, EU legislators appear to be focusing on access to existing specialized care. However, both systems have struggled with effectively promoting new treatments. Also, while Eurordis surveys have evaluated areas such as the access to medical services, access to social services and satisfaction with the services received in Europe, there are no comparable surveys in the United States. We conclude that better tools are needed to measure the quality of care, needs-assessment and outcome of pediatric rare diseases in both the EU and US. We suggest a better assessment of areas such as access to primary and specialty care, legal advocacy, comfort-care, end-of-life care, social and financial services, psychological support and quality outcome-measures.

[1]  P. Levy An Overview of Newborn Screening , 2010, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[2]  P. Newacheck,et al.  Prevalence and characteristics of children with special health care needs. , 2004, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[3]  H Moghadam,et al.  The rare and the plentiful - a dilemma in pediatric manpower. , 1974, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[4]  B. Fadeel,et al.  A journey of hope: lessons learned from studies on rare diseases and orphan drugs , 2006, Journal of internal medicine.

[5]  Roberta A Pagon,et al.  A model program to increase translation of rare disease genetic tests: collaboration, education, and test translation program , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[6]  M. Haffner Adopting orphan drugs--two dozen years of treating rare diseases. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Giuseppe Remuzzi,et al.  Rare diseases: what's next? , 2008, The Lancet.

[8]  D. Solís US Food and Drug Administration , 2010 .

[9]  M. Helm,et al.  Principles of Child Health Care Financing , 1998, Pediatrics.

[10]  Arrigo Schieppati,et al.  Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue , 2008, The Lancet.

[11]  H. Leufkens,et al.  Translation of rare disease research into orphan drug development: disease matters. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[12]  王林,et al.  Orphanet , 2011 .

[13]  Panos Kanavos,et al.  Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[14]  Vineet Bafna,et al.  Exome Sequencing Can Improve Diagnosis and Alter Patient Management , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.