Which factors predict the time spent answering queries to a drug information centre?

Objective To develop a model based upon factors able to predict the time spent answering drug-related queries to Norwegian drug information centres (DICs). Setting and method Drug-related queries received at 5 DICs in Norway from March to May 2007 were randomly assigned to 20 employees until each of them had answered a minimum of five queries. The employees reported the number of drugs involved, the type of literature search performed, and whether the queries were considered judgmental or not, using a specifically developed scoring system. Main outcome measures The scores of these three factors were added together to define a workload score for each query. Workload and its individual factors were subsequently related to the measured time spent answering the queries by simple or multiple linear regression analyses. Results Ninety-six query/answer pairs were analyzed. Workload significantly predicted the time spent answering the queries (adjusted R2 = 0.22, P < 0.001). Literature search was the individual factor best predicting the time spent answering the queries (adjusted R2 = 0.17, P < 0.001), and this variable also contributed the most in the multiple regression analyses. Conclusion The most important workload factor predicting the time spent handling the queries in this study was the type of literature search that had to be performed. The categorisation of queries as judgmental or not, also affected the time spent answering the queries. The number of drugs involved did not significantly influence the time spent answering drug information queries.

[1]  M E Joy,et al.  Use of information sources at a university hospital drug information service. , 1986, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[2]  A. Cardoni,et al.  Impact of drug information services on patient care. , 1978, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[3]  N C Morrow,et al.  DRUG INFORMATION INQUIRIES—WHO ASKS WHAT AND WHERE ARE THE ANSWERS? , 1984, Journal of clinical and hospital pharmacy.

[4]  Enid Gilbert-Barness Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Reference Guide to Fetal and Neonatal Risk , 1996 .

[5]  A. Wertheimer,et al.  Judgmental questions processed by a drug information center. , 1975, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[6]  J. Schjøtt,et al.  Quality and impact of problem-oriented drug information: a method to change clinical practice among physicians? , 2002, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[7]  Dale W. Quest,et al.  Stockley’s drug interactions. 8th edition; Stockley’s drug interactions 2008 pocket companion , 2008 .

[8]  L. Sylvia,et al.  External quality assurance committee for drug information services. , 1990, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[9]  J. Schjøtt,et al.  Advice on Drug Safety in Pregnancy , 2008, Drug safety.

[10]  G. Greenberg,et al.  Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation , 1990 .

[11]  W. Garnett,et al.  Analysis of a hospital-based drug information center. , 1977, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[12]  M. Rawlins,et al.  Comprehensive clinical drug information service: first year's experience. , 1977, British medical journal.