Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites

Abstract Objectives: To determine the characteristics of popular breast cancer related websites and whether more popular sites are of higher quality. Design: The search engine Google was used to generate a list of websites about breast cancer. Google ranks search results by measures of link popularity—the number of links to a site from other sites. The top 200 sites returned in response to the query “breast cancer” were divided into “more popular” and “less popular” subgroups by three different measures of link popularity: Google rank and number of links reported independently by Google and by AltaVista (another search engine). Main outcome measures: Type and quality of content. Results: More popular sites according to Google rank were more likely than less popular ones to contain information on ongoing clinical trials (27% v 12%, P=0.01), results of trials (12% v 3%, P=0.02), and opportunities for psychosocial adjustment (48% v 23%, P<0.01). These characteristics were also associated with higher number of links as reported by Google and AltaVista. More popular sites by number of linking sites were also more likely to provide updates on other breast cancer research, information on legislation and advocacy, and a message board service. Measures of quality such as display of authorship, attribution or references, currency of information, and disclosure did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Popularity of websites is associated with type rather than quality of content. Sites that include content correlated with popularity may best meet the public's desire for information about breast cancer. What is already known on this topic Patients are using the world wide web to search for health information Breast cancer is one of the most popular search topics Characteristics of popular websites may reflect the information needs of patients What this study adds Type rather than quality of content correlates with popularity of websites Measures of quality correlate with accuracy of medical information

[1]  J Sybil Biermann,et al.  Melanoma information on the Internet: often incomplete--a public health opportunity? , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[3]  L Hoffman-Goetz,et al.  Quality of Breast Cancer Sites on the World Wide Web , 2000, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[4]  J. O'connor,et al.  Use of the Web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population. , 2000, JAMA.

[5]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. , 2001, JAMA.

[6]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[7]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The low availability of metadata elements for evaluating the quality of medical information on the World Wide Web , 1999, AMIA.

[8]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. , 1997, JAMA.

[9]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Information in practice Towards quality management of medical information on the internet : evaluation , labelling , and filtering of information , 1998 .

[10]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups , 1995 .

[11]  William R. Hersh,et al.  Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web , 1999, AMIA.

[12]  Manish Latthe,et al.  Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  C Boyer,et al.  The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites , 1998, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[14]  H. Sandvik.  Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence , 1999, BMJ.

[15]  Jcb Leung.  Towards Quality Management , 2000 .