The symbolic distance effect in monkeys (Cebus apella)

In making comparative judgments about pairs of stimuli that are linearly ordered, human subjects usually respond faster the greater the separation between-the-items of a test pair—the symbolic distance effect. A similar result has been obtained for associatively related items, such as the alphabet. We report evidence for a distance effect in monkeys tested with pairs of items drawn from a five-item series with which they had considerable previous experience-in a serial learning setting. This finding provides independent evidence that in learning a serial list of items, monkeys acquire knowledge about the ordinal positions of the items. Analysis of the positive results obtained in Experiment 2 and of the failure to find a distance effect in Experiment 1 suggested that in learning a serial list, monkeys construct both an associative chain representation of the series and a spatial representation, with the latter supplying the spatial markers that convey positional information. This dual coding of sequential events, which may be rather general among mammals, probably supports a variety of cognitive competencies.

[1]  Herbert S. Terrace,et al.  Generalization of serial learning in the pigeon , 1981 .

[2]  Edward J. Shoben,et al.  Scripts as linear orders , 1980 .

[3]  M R D'Amato,et al.  Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  M. R. D'Amato,et al.  A Search for Tonal Pattern Perception in Cebus Monkeys: Why Monkeys Can't Hum a Tune , 1988 .

[5]  M R D'Amato,et al.  Representation of serial order in monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  S. H. Hulse,et al.  Serial pattern learning by rats: Transfer of a formally defined stimulus relationship and the significance of nonreinforcement , 1979 .

[7]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  Counting in rats: Its functional significance and the independent cognitive processes that constitute it. , 1988 .

[8]  Herbert S. Terrace,et al.  A nonverbal organism's knowledge of ordinal position in a serial learning task. , 1986 .

[9]  H. Roitblat.  The meaning of representation in animal memory , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  H. S. Terrace,et al.  Chunking by a pigeon in a serial learning task , 1987, Nature.

[11]  K J Holyoak,et al.  A positional discriminability model of linear-order judgments. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  E. Lovelace,et al.  Decision times for alphabetic order of letter pairs , 1971 .

[13]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  Ebbinghaus: Some associations. , 1985 .

[14]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Storing and retrieving information about ordered relationships. , 1974 .

[15]  S. H. Hulse,et al.  Extrapolation of serial stimulus patterns by rats , 1981 .

[16]  M. Colombo,et al.  Serial learning with wild card items by monkeys (Cebus apella): implications for knowledge of ordinal position. , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[17]  H. Roitblat,et al.  The representation of items in serial position , 1983 .

[18]  William P. Banks,et al.  Encoding and Processing of Symbolic Information in Comparative Judgments1 , 1977 .

[19]  J. Hamilton,et al.  The Symbolic Distance Effect for Alphabetic Order Judgements: A Subjective Report and Reaction Time Analysis , 1978 .

[20]  K. Lashley.  The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[21]  M. Colombo,et al.  On the limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.