Undergraduate research in the public domain: the evaluation of non‐academic sources online

Purpose – This paper seeks to suggest that criteria commonly used to teach undergraduates to evaluate online resources are inadequate when dealing with non‐academic items in the public domain. It aims to argue that these resources should not be ignored by librarians or undergraduates, but that they must still be evaluated. An alternative method of evaluation, based on the concepts of comparison, corroboration, motivation and purpose is to be proposed.Design/methodology/approach – Inadequacies of current evaluative standards are revealed, specifically in relation to the current context of how and where undergraduates conduct research. Drawing on Meola's contextual framework for evaluation, as well as the thoughts of Metzger, ways to handle the evaluation of non‐academic resources online emerge.Findings – Librarians must consider the place of non‐academic public domain items in current undergraduate research projects, and the challenges these items pose to common guidelines for the evaluation of sources. Ev...

[1]  David P. Dolowitz The Big E: How Electronic Information Can Be Fitted Into the Academic Process , 2007 .

[2]  Nicholas Hookway,et al.  `Entering the blogosphere': some strategies for using blogs in social research , 2008 .

[3]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Effect of the Web on Undergraduate Citation Behavior: Guiding Student Scholarship in a Networked Age , 2003 .

[4]  Joann E D’Esposito,et al.  University Students' Perceptions of the Internet: An Exploratory Study , 1999 .

[5]  Marc Meola,et al.  Chucking the Checklist: A Contextual Approach to Teaching Undergraduates Web-Site Evaluation , 2004 .

[6]  Anna M Caroline Van Scoyoc,et al.  The Electronic Academic Library: Undergraduate Research Behavior in a Library Without Books , 2006 .

[7]  Joy Tillotson Web site evaluation: a survey of undergraduates , 2002, Online Inf. Rev..

[8]  Deborah J. Grimes,et al.  Worries with the Web: A Look at Student Use of Web Resources , 2001 .

[9]  Andrew M Karen Robinson,et al.  Student Bibliographies Improve When Professors Provide Enforceable Guidelines for Citations , 2004 .

[10]  Miriam J. Metzger Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007 .

[11]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Electronic Publishing: Research Issues for Academic Librarians and Users , 2003, Libr. Trends.

[12]  Peter Brophy,et al.  Student Searching Behavior and the Web: Use of Academic Resources and Google , 2005, Libr. Trends.