Does a virtual audience influence rowing?

The performance of athletes is often influenced by the presence of an audience. This pressure situation, which is common for competition, cannot be trained for on available simulators. Therefore, a novel rowing simulator with virtual reality technology was developed and evaluated. Ten participants of different skill levels were rowing 3×1000m with positive, neutral, and negative virtual audience tribunes in blocks of random order. The analysis of movement variables, physiological response, questionnaires, and interviews was used to detect differences between audience blocks and adjoining non-audience blocks. Although some participants responded in part to the investigated movement and physiological variables, no reliable effect of any of the audience types could be shown. Interestingly, self-reported measures indicated in general a high degree of realism and presence in the scenario. The explanation for the low incidence of behavioural change is that the virtual audience did not create enough pressure on the participants, although no definite conclusion can be drawn owing to the small sample size.

[1]  W. Ilg,et al.  Learning-based methods for the analysis of intralimb-coordination and adaptation of locomotor patterns in cerebellar patients , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[2]  R. Baumeister,et al.  A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests , 1986 .

[3]  H. Hill Dynamics of coordination within elite rowing crews: evidence from force pattern analysis , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[4]  G. Riva,et al.  Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurements of User Presence in Synthetic Environments , 2003 .

[5]  D Hawkins,et al.  A new instrumentation system for training rowers. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Ivaylo I Christov,et al.  Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold , 2004, Biomedical engineering online.

[7]  Michael Meehan,et al.  Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments , 2002, SIGGRAPH.

[8]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Analysis of Physiological Responses to a Social Situation in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[9]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[10]  B. P. Lewis,et al.  Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance , 1997, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  Denise Whitelock,et al.  The notion of presence in virtual learning environments: what makes the environment "real" , 2000, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  Michiel van de Panne,et al.  A numerically efficient and stable algorithm for animating water waves , 2002, The Visual Computer.

[13]  L. Tarassenko,et al.  Characterizing artefact in the normal human 24-hour RR time series to aid identification and artificial replication of circadian variations in human beat to beat heart rate using a simple threshold , 2002, Computers in Cardiology.

[14]  Patria Anne Hume,et al.  Towards an Ideal Rowing Technique for Performance The Contributions from Biomechanics , 2004 .

[15]  W. Spinks,et al.  Discriminant analysis of biomechanical differences between novice, good and elite rowers. , 1995, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  Peter Wolf,et al.  Real‐time rowing simulator with multimodal feedback , 2008 .