The True Cost of PFAS and the Benefits of Acting Now

■ INTRODUCTION Perand polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of over 9000 persistent hazardous chemicals used in industrial processes and consumer goods. They are ubiquitous in the environment and in people, who are exposed to PFAS via contaminated food and water, consumer products, and workplaces. Exposure to several PFAS has been linked to a plethora of health effects in both animal and human studies, even at background levels. They are so environmentally persistent that they have been termed “forever chemicals.” While in many ways PFAS contamination problems reflect broader issues with the chemicals regulatory system in the United States, a key feature of this industry is that only a handful of companies have produced the basic chemical building blocks for PFAS chemicals. These companies have known about the potential toxicity, human exposure, and extreme persistence of PFAS since the 1970s, yet have continued and expanded production. In the 2000s, in response to mounting pressure from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) about risks to human and environmental health, PFAS manufacturers agreed to phase out U.S. production of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), and some related PFAS. Replacement PFAS, including new chemicals developed by industry, are widely used in more than 200 use categories, despite growing concerns about exposures, persistence, and toxicity. The PFAS industry claims that the chemicals’ use in consumer goods and industrial applications brings wide benefits, valuing the U.S. fluoropolymer segment at $2 billion a year. However, it fails to mention the costs of exposure, which are long-term, wide-ranging, routinely externalized onto

[1]  V. Mathrani,et al.  Regulating PFAS as a Chemical Class under the California Safer Consumer Products Program , 2021, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  P. Grandjean,et al.  Severity of COVID-19 at elevated exposure to perfluorinated alkylates , 2020, PloS one.

[3]  David Q. Andrews,et al.  Population-Wide Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Drinking Water in the United States , 2020 .

[4]  Heather M. Wallace,et al.  Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food , 2020, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[5]  Carla A. Ng,et al.  An overview of the uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). , 2020, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[6]  Katherine E Pelch,et al.  Scientific Basis for Managing PFAS as a Chemical Class. , 2020, Environmental science & technology letters.

[7]  Steven Gold,et al.  Filling gaps in science exposes gaps in chemical regulation , 2020, Science.

[8]  Michael Holland,et al.  The cost of inaction , 2019, TemaNord.

[9]  P. Brown,et al.  Non-stick science: Sixty years of research and (in)action on fluorinated compounds , 2018, Social studies of science.

[10]  Zhanyun Wang,et al.  A Never-Ending Story of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs)? , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Jeffrey E. Zabel,et al.  A Hedonic Analysis of the Impact of LUST Sites on House Prices in Frederick, Baltimore, and Baltimore City Counties , 2012 .

[12]  Y ACRÓNIMOS,et al.  ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) case studies in environmental medicine. Vinyl chloride toxicity. , 1990, Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology.