Name–picture verification as a control measure for object naming: A task analysis and norms for a large set of pictures

The name–picture verification task is widely used in spoken production studies to control for nonlexical differences between picture sets. In this task a word is presented first and followed, after a pause, by a picture. Participants must then make a speeded decision on whether both word and picture refer to the same object. Using regression analyses, we systematically explored the characteristics of this task by assessing the independent contribution of a series of factors that have been found relevant for picture naming in previous studies. We found that, for “match” responses, both visual and conceptual factors played a role, but lexical variables were not significant contributors. No clear pattern emerged from the analysis of “no-match” responses. We interpret these results as validating the use of “match” latencies as control variables in studies or spoken production using picture naming. Norms for match and no-match responses for 396 line drawings taken from Cycowicz, Friedman, Rothstein, and Snodgrass (1997) can be downloaded at: http://language.psy.bris.ac.uk/name-picture_verification.html

[1]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: indirect election of words , 1983, Cognition.

[2]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Human Visual Cognition , 1979 .

[3]  H. Kremin Spared naming without comprehension , 1986, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[4]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion , 2003 .

[5]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[6]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[7]  M. A. Pérez,et al.  Normas españolas de 290 nuevos dibujos:acuerdo en la denominación, concordancia de la imagen, familiaridad, complejidad visual y variabilidad de la imagen , 2003 .

[8]  H. Stadthagen-González,et al.  The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Miguel A. Perez Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  M. Vitkovitch,et al.  Sources of Disagreement in Object Naming , 1995 .

[14]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[15]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Selection by color and form in vision. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Semantic systems or system? Neuropsychological evidence re-examined , 1988 .

[17]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[18]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  An MEG Study of Picture Naming , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[20]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[21]  Darren George,et al.  SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference , 1998 .

[22]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Attention to orientation, size, luminance, and color: attentional failure within the form domain. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Picture naming and word frequency: Comments on Alario, Costa and Caramazza, Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(3), 299-319 , 2002 .

[25]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech , 2007, Cognition.

[26]  Julio Santiago,et al.  Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming , 2000 .

[27]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Top-down processes in object identification: evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology and functional anatomy. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[29]  M. Garrett Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[30]  Tim Valentine,et al.  The effects of age of acquisition on object perception , 2004 .

[31]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  The role of visual similarity in picture categorization. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Juan Segui,et al.  Predictors of picture naming speed , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[33]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[34]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .

[35]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  ROLES OF WORD FREQUENCY AND AGE OF ACQUISITION IN WORD NAMING AND LEXICAL DECISION , 1995 .

[36]  A. Caramazza How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[37]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[38]  J. Theios,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. , 1989, Psychological review.

[39]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[40]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997), and naming latencies , 2003 .

[41]  A. Burton,et al.  Matching faces for semantic information and names: an event-related brain potentials study. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[42]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[43]  Angel Fernandez,et al.  A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity , 1996 .

[44]  Elaine Funnell,et al.  Those old, familiar things: age of acquisition, familiarity and lexical access in progressive aphasia , 1995, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[45]  W. Levelt,et al.  Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production , 1998, Cognition.

[46]  Cristina Izura,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in translation judgement tasks , 2004 .

[47]  J. Morton,et al.  The effects of priming on picture recognition. , 1982, British journal of psychology.

[48]  G. Humphreys,et al.  An interactive activation approach to object processing: effects of structural similarity, name frequency, and task in normality and pathology. , 1995, Memory.

[49]  Roy Lachman,et al.  Language and Cognition: Effects of Stimulus Codability, Name-Word Frequency, and Age of Acquisition on Lexical Reaction Time. , 1974 .

[50]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[51]  Miguel A. Perez,et al.  Objective-AoA norms for 175 names in Spanish: relationships with other psycholinguistic variables, estimated AoA, and data from other languages , 2005 .

[52]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study. , 1998 .

[53]  A. Wingfield Effects of frequency on identification and naming of objects. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[54]  E. Funnell,et al.  Age of acquisition for naming and knowing: A new hypothesis , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[55]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming , 1991 .

[56]  Naming very familiar people: when retrieving names is faster than retrieving semantic biographical information. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[57]  A. Paivio,et al.  Cognitive components of picture naming. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Use of word length information in utterance planning , 2007 .

[59]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Global shape cannot be attended without object identification. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  F. Cuetos,et al.  Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano , 1995 .

[61]  F Cuetos,et al.  Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[62]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[63]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent , 2006 .

[64]  Fernando Cuetos,et al.  Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 328 words in Spanish , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[65]  Joan Gay Snodgrass,et al.  Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 1996 .

[66]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[67]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Are age-of-acquisition effects on object naming due simply to differences in object recognition? Comments on Levelt (2002) , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[68]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Automatic access to object identity: attention to global information, not to particular physical dimensions, is important. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  B. Farell,et al.  Same-different judgments: a review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[70]  W. Glaser Picture naming , 1992, Cognition.

[71]  P. Feyereisen,et al.  The operativity effect in naming: A re-analysis , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[72]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions , 1984 .

[73]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Implicit speech in reading: Reconsidered , 1973 .