The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence

The distinctive metatheoretical and empirical significance of the social identity concept for social psychology is outlined with special reference to social influence and group polarization. ‘Individualism’ and ‘interactionism’ are summarized and contrasted as alternative metatheories of social psychology and it is argued that the social identity concept embodies the latter. A social identity theory of group behaviour (and the individual-group relationship) is introduced and from it are derived further theories of social influence and group polarization. The latter is explained as a special case of normal intragroup influence. It is shown how the social identity theory (theories) of group behaviour, social influence and group polarization explicitly assumes a functional interaction between psychological and social processes, in contrast to individualism, and at the same time generates distinctive, testable, empirical predictions. It is concluded that the social identity concept represents a mechanism of social-psychological interaction and as such demonstrates that social psychology need not be an individualistic science.

[1]  John C. Turner,et al.  Distinctiveness and the salience of social category memberships: Is there an automatic perceptual bias towards novelty? , 1986 .

[2]  M. Hogg,et al.  When liking begets solidarity: An experiment on the role of interpersonal attraction in psychological group formation , 1985 .

[3]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior , 1985 .

[4]  M. Hogg,et al.  Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation , 1985 .

[5]  H. Tajfel.  The Social Dimension: European Developments In Social Psychology , 1984 .

[6]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  Mental Representations of the Self , 1984 .

[7]  Carol Sherrard,et al.  The power of minorities , 1982 .

[8]  Albert Pepitone,et al.  Lessons from the History of Social Psychology. , 1981 .

[9]  E. Sampson,et al.  Cognitive psychology as ideology. , 1981 .

[10]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Individuals and groups in social psychology. , 1979 .

[11]  D. Cartwright.  Contemporary social psychology in historical perspective. , 1979 .

[12]  R. Singleton.  Another Look at the Conformity Explanation of Group-Induced Shifts in Choice , 1979 .

[13]  W. Doise,et al.  Groups and Individuals: Explanations in Social Psychology , 1978 .

[14]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[15]  David G. Myers,et al.  Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior , 1978 .

[16]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Studies of similarity , 1978 .

[17]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[18]  E. Sampson.  Psychology and the American ideal. , 1977 .

[19]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Social Influence And Social Change , 1976 .

[20]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour , 1975 .

[21]  Vernon L. Allen,et al.  Social Support for Nonconformity , 1975 .

[22]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[23]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Psychological set and social conformity. , 1956, Journal of personality.

[24]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[26]  L. Festinger.  Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[27]  H. B. English.  Resolving social conflicts. , 1949 .

[28]  L. Doob.  The psychology of social norms. , 1937 .