How much do van der Waals dispersion forces contribute to molecular recognition in solution?

The emergent properties that arise from self-assembly and molecular recognition phenomena are a direct consequence of non-covalent interactions. Gas-phase measurements and computational methods point to the dominance of dispersion forces in molecular association, but solvent effects complicate the unambiguous quantification of these forces in solution. Here, we have used synthetic molecular balances to measure interactions between apolar alkyl chains in 31 organic, fluorous and aqueous solvent environments. The experimental interaction energies are an order of magnitude smaller than estimates of dispersion forces between alkyl chains that have been derived from vaporization enthalpies and dispersion-corrected calculations. Instead, it was found that cohesive solvent-solvent interactions are the major driving force behind apolar association in solution. The results suggest that theoretical models that implicate important roles for dispersion forces in molecular recognition events should be interpreted with caution in solvent-accessible systems.

[1]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Hans-Jörg Schneider,et al.  Binding mechanisms in supramolecular complexes. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  The Casimir effect in microstructured geometries , 2011 .

[4]  H. Schneider,et al.  Additivity and quantification of dispersive interactions--from cyclopropyl to nitro groups: measurements on porphyrin derivatives. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.

[5]  F. Diederich,et al.  Interactions with aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[6]  K. Müller-Dethlefs,et al.  Hydrogen-Bonding and van der Waals Complexes Studied by ZEKE and REMPI Spectroscopy. , 2000, Chemical reviews.

[7]  A. A. Fokin,et al.  Overcoming lability of extremely long alkane carbon–carbon bonds through dispersion forces , 2011, Nature.

[8]  F. Diederich,et al.  Orthogonal dipolar interactions between amide carbonyl groups , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  C. Hunter,et al.  Desolvation and substituent effects in edge-to-face aromatic interactions. , 2009, Chemical communications.

[10]  D. Kristol,et al.  Cyclodextrin inclusion complexes: studies of the variation in the size of alicyclic guests , 1989 .

[11]  Y. Marcus.  Internal pressure of liquids and solutions. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[12]  C. Hunter,et al.  Quantifying intermolecular interactions: guidelines for the molecular recognition toolbox. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[13]  S. Grimme,et al.  Dispersion-corrected density functional theory for aromatic interactions in complex systems. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[14]  W. C. Still,et al.  A remarkable effect of solvent size on the stability of a molecular complex , 1989 .

[15]  François Diederich,et al.  Strength of molecular complexation of apolar solutes in water and in organic solvents is predictable by linear free energy relationships: a general model for solvation effects on apolar binding , 1990 .

[16]  F. Diederich,et al.  A weak attractive interaction between organic fluorine and an amide group. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[17]  S. Dietrich,et al.  Direct measurement of critical Casimir forces , 2008, Nature.

[18]  Sung Chul Bae,et al.  A Curious Antipathy for Water , 2008, Science.

[19]  C. Wilcox,et al.  MOLECULAR TORSION BALANCE FOR WEAK MOLECULAR RECOGNITION FORCES. EFFECTS OF TILTED-T EDGE-TO-FACE AROMATIC INTERACTIONS ON CONFORMATIONAL SELECTION AND SOLID-STATE STRUCTURE , 1994 .

[20]  F. Diederich,et al.  Molecular torsion balances: evidence for favorable orthogonal dipolar interactions between organic fluorine and amide groups. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[21]  J. Rebek,et al.  The 55 % Solution: A Formula for Molecular Recognition in the Liquid State , 1998 .

[22]  Ramón Bosque,et al.  Polarizabilities of Solvents from the Chemical Composition , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[23]  Scott L Cockroft,et al.  Chemical double-mutant cycles: dissecting non-covalent interactions. , 2007, Chemical Society reviews.

[24]  Yunfeng Shi,et al.  Wetting transparency of graphene. , 2012, Nature materials.

[25]  Stephen M Martin,et al.  Structure and rheology of hydrogen bond reinforced liquid crystals , 2004 .

[26]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom-atom dispersion corrections. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[27]  D. Chandler.  Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly , 2005, Nature.

[28]  B. Hammer,et al.  Alkane dimers interaction: A semi-local MGGA functional study , 2010 .

[29]  C. Hunter,et al.  Desolvation tips the balance: solvent effects on aromatic interactions. , 2006, Chemical communications.

[30]  Charles A Laughton,et al.  Van der Waals interactions dominate ligand-protein association in a protein binding site occluded from solvent water. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  Rodney S. Ruoff,et al.  Radial deformation of carbon nanotubes by van der Waals forces , 1993, Nature.

[32]  J. Atwood,et al.  Storage of Methane and Freon by Interstitial van der Waals Confinement , 2002, Science.

[33]  C. Wilcox,et al.  A minimal protein folding model to measure hydrophobic and CH-pi effects on interactions between nonpolar surfaces in water. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[34]  Kazumasa Honda,et al.  Estimated MP2 and CCSD(T) interaction energies of n-alkane dimers at the basis set limit: comparison of the methods of Helgaker et al. and Feller. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[35]  K. Rissanen,et al.  White Phosphorus Is Air-Stable Within a Self-Assembled Tetrahedral Capsule , 2009, Science.

[36]  W. S. Koski,et al.  Physicochemical Aspects of the Action of General Anaesthetics , 1973, Nature.

[37]  Martin L Dunn,et al.  Ultrastrong adhesion of graphene membranes. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[38]  M. Pileni,et al.  Van der Waals versus dipolar forces controlling mesoscopic organizations of magnetic nanocrystals , 2004, Nature materials.

[39]  Anthony J Stone,et al.  Intermolecular Potentials , 2008, Science.

[40]  I. Mati,et al.  Electrostatic modulation of aromatic rings via explicit solvation of substituents. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[41]  J. Bowie,et al.  Similar energetic contributions of packing in the core of membrane and water-soluble proteins. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  S. Cockroft,et al.  Molecular balances for quantifying non-covalent interactions. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[43]  C. Hunter,et al.  Molecular probes of solvation phenomena. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[44]  S. Otto.  The role of solvent cohesion in nonpolar solvation , 2013 .

[45]  Gino A. DiLabio,et al.  Dispersion Interactions in Density‐Functional Theory , 2010 .

[46]  D. Truhlar,et al.  The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals , 2008 .

[47]  S. Ngola,et al.  Evidence for the Importance of Polarizability in Biomimetic Catalysis Involving Cyclophane Receptors. , 1996, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[48]  Charles A Laughton,et al.  Strong solute-solute dispersive interactions in a protein-ligand complex. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[49]  D Chandler,et al.  Van der Waals Picture of Liquids, Solids, and Phase Transformations , 1983, Science.

[50]  M. Dack.  The importance of solvent internal pressure and cohesion to solution phenomena , 1975 .