Development of Indirect Measures of Conscientiousness: Combining a Facets Approach and Network Analysis

Because indirect measures of personality self–concepts such as the Implicit Association Test (IAT) allow tapping into automatic processes, they can offer advantages over self–report measures. However, prior investigations have led to mixed results regarding the validity of indirect measures of conscientiousness. We suggest that these results might be due to a failure to consider the different facets of conscientiousness. These facets are of crucial importance because they are associated differentially with other psychobiological constructs and they are also characterized by different mechanisms. Therefore, focusing on facets while developing indirect measures of conscientiousness may improve the validity of such measures. In Study 1, we conducted a psycholexical investigation to develop one IAT for each conscientiousness facet. In Study 2, we examined the convergent and discriminant validities of each facet IAT in relation to self–report measures, peer–report measures and self–report behavioural indicators, and we investigated differential associations of the conscientiousness facets with working memory capacity and self–control. We employed network analysis as a novel approach to elucidate differential relationships involving personality facets. The results corroborated the convergent and discriminant validity of the conscientiousness facet IATs with self–reports and showed that the conscientiousness facets were differentially associated with working memory capacity and with self–control. Copyright © 2015 European Association of Personality Psychology

[1]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Convergent Validity of Self-Control Measures. , 2011, Journal of research in personality.

[2]  G. Costantini,et al.  A functional perspective on personality. , 2016, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[3]  Y. Trope,et al.  Two of what? A conceptual analysis of dual‑process theories of the social mind , 2014 .

[4]  H. Moon,et al.  The two faces of conscientiousness: duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  Nash Unsworth,et al.  Exploring the Relations Among Executive Functions, Fluid Intelligence, and Personality , 2009 .

[7]  Cassandra L. Govan,et al.  Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by re-defining the category labels , 2004 .

[8]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[9]  B. de Raad,et al.  The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: a comparison across languages. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  M. Perugini,et al.  Implicit self-concept and moral action , 2009 .

[11]  F. Strack,et al.  Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[12]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[13]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Russell E. Johnson,et al.  Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: a review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Eric D. Kolaczyk,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Network Data: Methods and Models , 2009 .

[16]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Handbook of implicit social cognition : measurement, theory,and applications , 2010 .

[17]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[18]  Anne-Laure Boulesteix,et al.  Regularized estimation of large-scale gene association networks using graphical Gaussian models , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[19]  Daniel M McNeish,et al.  Using Lasso for Predictor Selection and to Assuage Overfitting: A Method Long Overlooked in Behavioral Sciences , 2015, Multivariate behavioral research.

[20]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  Gernot von Collani,et al.  Measuring Big-Five personality dimensions with the implicit association test – Implicit personality traits or self-esteem? , 2007 .

[22]  Lewis R Goldberg,et al.  A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[24]  O. John,et al.  Development of big five domains and facets in adulthood: mean-level age trends and broadly versus narrowly acting mechanisms. , 2012, Journal of personality.

[25]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Unraveling the Processes Underlying Evaluation: Attitudes from the Perspective of the Ape Model , 2007 .

[26]  S. Vazire.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Who Knows What About a Person ? The Self – Other Knowledge Asymmetry ( SOKA ) Model , 2010 .

[27]  Verena D. Schmittmann,et al.  Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data , 2012 .

[28]  M. Banaji,et al.  PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE IAT 1 RUNNING HEAD : PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE IAT Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test : III . Meta-analysis of Predictive Validity , 2006 .

[29]  K. Markon,et al.  Toward a theory of distinct types of "impulsive" behaviors: A meta-analysis of self-report and behavioral measures. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Marco Perugini,et al.  A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  A. Poropat.  A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  M. Ashton,et al.  Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Trait self-control and the avoidance of temptation , 2015 .

[34]  Augusto Gnisci,et al.  The HEXACO model of personality structure and indigenous lexical personality dimensions in Italian, Dutch, and English , 2006 .

[35]  A. Metspalu,et al.  Within-Trait Heterogeneity in Age Group Differences in Personality Domains and Facets: Implications for the Development and Coherence of Personality Traits , 2015, PloS one.

[36]  M. Ashton,et al.  A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure , 2005 .

[37]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[38]  Benjamin F. Rodriguez,et al.  Psychometric Properties , 2009 .

[39]  Dustin Wood,et al.  What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC). , 2010, Journal of research in personality.

[40]  R. Tibshirani.  Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[41]  Malte Friese,et al.  Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects , 2006 .

[42]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: evidence for a common executive attention construct. , 2010, Neuropsychology.

[43]  James Jaccard,et al.  Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction , 2006 .

[44]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[45]  A. Pincus,et al.  NEO PI-R Predictors of Alcohol Use and Alcohol-Related Problems , 2003, Journal of personality assessment.

[46]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF CONSCIENTIOUSNESS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION BASED ON SEVEN MAJOR PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRES , 2005 .

[47]  W. Hofmann,et al.  A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[48]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  A possible model for understanding the personality--intelligence interface. , 2004, British journal of psychology.

[49]  M. Steffens,et al.  Predicting Spontaneous Big Five Behavior with Implicit Association Tests , 2006 .

[50]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Why is Conscientiousness negatively correlated with intelligence , 2004 .

[51]  Virgil Zeigler-Hill,et al.  Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem: implications for narcissism and self-esteem instability. , 2006, Journal of personality.

[52]  Roland Deutsch,et al.  4. Building blocks of social behavior: reflective and impulsive processes , 2010 .

[53]  C. Allen Gorman,et al.  A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: Work-related antecedents and consequences , 2012 .

[54]  Brian A. Nosek.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Implicit–Explicit Relations , 2022 .

[55]  Kenneth J. Harris,et al.  P = f (Conscientiousness × Ability): Examining the Facets of Conscientiousness , 2010 .

[56]  Y. Suchy,et al.  Five-Factor Model personality traits and executive functioning among older adults , 2010 .

[57]  Juliette Richetin,et al.  Predictive Validity of IAT Aggressiveness in the Context of Provocation , 2010 .

[58]  Joshua J. Jackson,et al.  Not all conscientiousness scales change alike: a multimethod, multisample study of age differences in the facets of conscientiousness. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  Michelangelo Vianello,et al.  Implicit conscientiousness predicts academic performance , 2010 .

[60]  P. Costa,et al.  Domains and facets: hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. , 1995, Journal of personality assessment.

[61]  B. Muthén,et al.  Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling , 2009 .

[62]  Boris Egloff,et al.  Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[63]  K. Vohs,et al.  The Strength Model of Self-Control , 2007, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[64]  Margaret L. Kern,et al.  Personality, well-being, and health. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[65]  M. Ashton,et al.  On the prediction of academic performance with personality traits: A replication study , 2013 .

[66]  M. Perugini,et al.  A hierarchical faceted model of the Big Five , 1997 .

[67]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  A Network Analysis of the Italian Overnight Money Market , 2005 .

[68]  A. Tellegen,et al.  An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  H. Westmeyer.  Tradition and Innovation , 2006 .

[70]  B. Roberts,et al.  The role of adherence in the relationship between conscientiousness and perceived health. , 2011, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[71]  M. Ashton,et al.  The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. , 2008, Journal of personality.

[72]  M. Back,et al.  Validity of the Five-Factor Model for the Implicit Self-Concept of Personality , 2008 .

[73]  R. Baumeister,et al.  High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[74]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. - 2nd ed. , 2011 .

[75]  K. Macdonald,et al.  Effortful control, explicit processing, and the regulation of human evolved predispositions. , 2008, Psychological review.

[76]  Richard D. Roberts,et al.  Empirical identification of the major facets of Conscientiousness , 2009 .

[77]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[78]  B. Bartholow,et al.  Specifying Associations Between Conscientiousness and Executive Functioning: Mental Set Shifting, Not Prepotent Response Inhibition or Working Memory Updating. , 2016, Journal of personality.

[79]  H. Zou.  The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties , 2006 .

[80]  Gerard Saucier,et al.  Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: indications for a big six structure. , 2009, Journal of personality.

[81]  L. R. Goldberg.  The structure of phenotypic personality traits. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[82]  Delroy L. Paulhus,et al.  Self-Report Measures of Intelligence: Are They Useful as Proxy IQ Tests? , 1998 .

[83]  Margaret L. Kern,et al.  Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[84]  Marco Perugini,et al.  Personality described by adjectives: The generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context , 1994 .

[85]  Brent W. Roberts,et al.  Conscientiousness and Health across the Life Course , 2005 .

[86]  M. Ashton,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[87]  B. Roberts,et al.  A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness. , 2004 .

[88]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[89]  B. Roberts,et al.  Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: a meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[90]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[91]  A. Bakker,et al.  Stop and Start Control: A Distinction within Self–Control , 2011 .

[92]  Robert F Krueger,et al.  What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed? , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[93]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[94]  S. Horvath,et al.  A General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis , 2005, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[95]  R. D. Vries,et al.  Tales of two self-control scales: Relations with Five-Factor and HEXACO traits , 2013 .

[96]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  An automated version of the operation span task , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[97]  Doris L. Payne,et al.  A Basic Bivariate Structure of Personality Attributes Evident Across Nine Languages. , 2014, Journal of personality.

[98]  B. Egloff,et al.  Temporal Stability of the Implicit Association Test-Anxiety , 2005, Journal of personality assessment.

[99]  W. Iacono,et al.  How are conscientiousness and cognitive ability related to one another? A re-examination of the intelligence compensation hypothesis , 2014 .

[100]  Kate B. Oddi,et al.  Cognitive Correlates of Personality , 2013 .

[101]  M. Timmerman,et al.  Towards A Pan–Cultural Personality Structure: Input from 11 Psycholexical Studies , 2014 .

[102]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[103]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[104]  M. Ashton.  Personality and job performance: the importance of narrow traits , 1998 .

[105]  Sacha Epskamp,et al.  semPlot: Unified Visualizations of Structural Equation Models , 2015 .

[106]  A. Hopkins.  Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[107]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[108]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2002, Psychological review.

[109]  Han L. J. van der Maas,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological an Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[110]  D. Borsboom,et al.  State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R , 2015 .

[111]  Eric D. Kolaczyk,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Network Data , 2009 .

[112]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Dimensions of Normal Personality as Networks in Search of Equilibrium: You Can't like Parties if you Don't like People , 2012 .

[113]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[114]  R. Banse,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Double Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Personality Self-Concept: The Case of Shy Behavior , 2002 .

[115]  A. Furnham,et al.  What Facets of Openness and Conscientiousness Predict Fluid Intelligence Score , 2006 .

[116]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[117]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[118]  Tracy L. Spinrad,et al.  Conscientiousness: origins in childhood? , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[119]  Herbert W Marsh,et al.  Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. , 2014, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[120]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[121]  Boris Egloff,et al.  Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[122]  S. Paunonen,et al.  Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance , 2007 .

[123]  Sampo V. Paunonen,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Personality and Prediction of Behavior , 1998 .