Results of directional coronary atherectomy during multicenter preapproval testing. The US Directional Coronary Atherectomy Investigator Group.

[1]  D. Baim,et al.  Evaluating new devices. Acute (in-hospital) results from the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention Registry. , 1994, Circulation.

[2]  M. Leon,et al.  Clinical and angiographic outcome after directional coronary atherectomy. A qualitative and quantitative analysis using coronary arteriography and intravascular ultrasound. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  D. Ricci,et al.  A comparison of directional atherectomy with balloon angioplasty for lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Califf,et al.  A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease , 1993 .

[5]  E. Topol,et al.  Quantitative analysis of factors influencing late lumen loss and restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  C M Gibson,et al.  Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Long-term results of directional coronary atherectomy: predictors of restenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  R D Safian,et al.  Restenosis After Directional Coronary Atherectomy Effects of Luminal Diameter and Deep Wall Excision , 1992, Circulation.

[9]  J. Simpson,et al.  Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Bell,et al.  Results of directional atherectomy of primary atheromatous and restenosis lesions in coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  E. Topol,et al.  Abrupt vessel closure after directional coronary atherectomy , 1992 .

[12]  L. Wilkins.  Evaluation of emerging technologies for coronary revascularization. Participants in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Conference on the Evaluation of Emerging Coronary Revascularization Technologies. , 1992, Circulation.

[13]  E. Topol,et al.  Clinical, angiographic and procedural correlates of quantitative coronary dimensions after directional coronary atherectomy. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  M. Savage,et al.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: A multilvariate statistical model to relate lesion and procedure variables to restenosis☆ , 1991 .

[15]  E. Topol,et al.  Relation of Stenosis Morphology and Clinical Presentation to the Procedural Results of Directional Coronary Atherectomy , 1991, Circulation.

[16]  J. Simpson,et al.  Effect of lesion characteristics on outcome of directional coronary atherectomy. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  E J Topol,et al.  Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.

[18]  J. Simpson,et al.  Comparison of dissection rates and angiographic results following directional coronary atherectomy and coronary angioplasty. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  D. Baim,et al.  Problems in the development of new devices for coronary intervention: possible role for a multicenter registry. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.