Characterizing Breast Phenotype with a Novel Measure of Fibroglandular Structure

Understanding, and accurately being able to predict, breast cancer risk would greatly enhance the early detection, and hence treatment, of the disease. In this paper we describe a new metric for mammographic structure, "orientated mammographic entropy", via a comprehensive classification of image pixels into one of seven basic image feature (BIF) classes. These classes are flat (zero order), slope-like (first order), and maximum, minimum, light-lines, dark-lines and saddles (second order). By computing a reference breast orientation with respect to breast shape and nipple location, these classes are further subdivided into 23 orientated BIF classes. For a given mammogram a histogram is constructed from the proportion of pixels in each of the 23 classes, and the orientated mammographic entropy, Hom, computed from this histogram. Hom, shows good correlation between left and right breasts (r2=0.76, N=478), and is independent of both mammographic breast area, a surrogate for breast size (r2=0.07, N=974), and breast density, as estimated using VolparaTM software (r2=0.11, N=385). We illustrate this metric by examining its relationship to familial breast cancer risk, for 118 subjects, using the BOADICEA genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer model.

[1]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  An Anatomically Oriented Breast Coordinate System for Mammogram Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Emil Y. Sidky,et al.  Development of an Analytic Breast Phantom for Quantitative Comparison of Reconstruction Algorithms for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[4]  M. Nielsen,et al.  A novel and automatic mammographic texture resemblance marker is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. , 2011, Cancer epidemiology.

[5]  D. Easton,et al.  The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Validation of Mammographic Texture Analysis for Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[7]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Automated classification of breast parenchymal density: topologic analysis of x-ray attenuation patterns depicted with digital mammography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Lewis D. Griffin The Second Order Local-Image-Structure Solid , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[10]  V. Beral,et al.  Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future , 2006, Journal of medical screening.

[11]  Michael J. Carston,et al.  Texture Features from Mammographic Images and Risk of Breast Cancer , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[12]  Mads Nielsen,et al.  Automated Effect-Specific Mammographic Pattern Measures , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  A Shantini,et al.  Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Lewis D. Griffin,et al.  Using Basic Image Features for Texture Classification , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  N. Boyd,et al.  Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.