Transport, economic competitiveness and competition: A city perspective

Stimulating the economy is a dominant policy objective, but on what basis are decisions being taken around transport and growth? We describe how transport studies and political geography offer two related, but poorly connected, theoretical approaches purporting to explain the relationship between transport and the economy. Yet in what ways does it matter that two different world views exist? We test these questions through an empirical case study of how city and regional officials use transport in attempting to realise economic objectives. Echoing theoretical approaches based in political geography, we find officials' own reasoning places emphasis on supply side improvements, especially connectivity within regions and on a high quality urban environment hoped to attract high GVA jobs. The decision-support tools are not well aligned to this reasoning, focussing on time savings and the justification of the value for money of proposed schemes relative to other investments in the region and nationally. In contrast to much theoretical work on competitiveness, employment growth is treated as exogenous with less emphasis given to which areas win and lose in the region. It is competition between weaker regional towns and cities that is prominent in officials' discourse. Such a gap between the thinking by officials, and the types of available transport investment decision-support tools, is of international significance. Given the centrality of the economy to where and what we invest in, the paper suggests a need for better knowledge about the efficacy of urban realm and other supply side improvements on job creation and on the influence of local autonomy in decision-making on investment selection and outcomes.

[1]  C. Ranci.  Competitiveness and Social Cohesion in Western European Cities , 2011 .

[2]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  The Use of Travel Time by Rail Passengers in Great Britain , 2007 .

[3]  V. Basolo.  City Spending on Economic Development versus Affordable Housing: Does Inter-City Competition or Local Politics Drive Decisions? , 2000 .

[4]  P. Krugman.  MAKING SENSE OF THE COMPETITIVENESS DEBATE , 1996 .

[5]  I. Begg.  Cities and Competitiveness , 1999 .

[6]  R. Noland,et al.  Do Public Transport Improvements Increase Agglomeration Economies? A Review of Literature and an Agenda for Research , 2011 .

[7]  Douglas C. Baker,et al.  Regional aviation and economic growth : cointegration and causality analysis in Australia , 2015 .

[8]  Bertil Vilhelmson,et al.  Is Regular Work at Fixed Places Fading Away? The Development of ICT-Based and Travel-Based Modes of Work in Sweden , 2001 .

[9]  G. Marsden.  The evidence base for parking policies—a review , 2006 .

[10]  W. Lever.  Competitive Cities in Europe , 1999 .

[11]  Genevieve Giuliano,et al.  Network Accessibility and Employment Centres , 2012 .

[12]  Robert Hrelja,et al.  Integrating transport and land-use planning? How steering cultures in local authorities affect implementation of integrated public transport and land-use planning , 2015 .

[13]  Rod Eddington,et al.  The Eddington Transport Study: Main Report - Transport's Role in Sustaining the UK's Productivity and Competitiveness , 2006 .

[14]  Kevin Ward,et al.  Competitive City-Regionalism as a Politics of Space: A Critical Reinterpretation of the New Regionalism , 2004 .

[15]  K. Lucas.  Making the connections: final report on transport and social exclusion , 2003 .

[16]  N. Thompson.  Hollowing Out the State: Public Choice Theory and the Critique of Keynesian Social Democracy , 2008 .

[17]  J. Urry,et al.  Travel time use in the information age , 2005 .

[18]  The BBC, the Creative Class, and Neoliberal Urbanism in the North of England , 2008 .

[19]  J. Lovering.  Theory Led by Policy: The Inadequacies of the ‘New Regionalism’ (Illustrated from the Case of Wales) , 1999 .

[20]  David Banister,et al.  Transport and economic development: reviewing the evidence , 2012 .

[21]  J. Agnew.  From the political economy of regions to regional political economy , 2000 .

[22]  J. Cidell.  The role of major infrastructure in subregional economic development: an empirical study of airports and cities , 2015 .

[23]  Tom Rye,et al.  Public Acceptability of Road User Charging: The Case of Edinburgh and the 2005 Referendum , 2007 .

[24]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Current operational urban land‐use–transport modelling frameworks: A review , 2005 .

[25]  J. Schade,et al.  Reactance or acceptance? Reactions towards the introduction of road pricing , 2007 .

[26]  Jonathan Leape.  The London Congestion Charge , 2006 .

[27]  R. Noland,et al.  Testing for Causality between Productivity and Agglomeration Economies , 2010 .

[28]  Nick Clifton.  The “creative class” in the uk: an initial analysis , 2008 .

[29]  Maria Börjesson,et al.  The Gothenburg congestion charge. Effects, design and politics , 2015 .

[30]  Jose Manuel Vassallo,et al.  Transportation Infrastructure Impacts on Firm Location: The Effect of a New Metro Line in the Suburbs of Madrid , 2012 .

[31]  D. Mueller.  Public Choice III: What have we learned? , 1979 .

[32]  S. Shepherd,et al.  Competition between two cities using cordon tolls: an exploration of response surfaces and possibilities for collusion , 2013 .

[33]  S. Proost,et al.  Parking Policies and Road Pricing , 2000 .

[34]  Balwant Singh,et al.  Urban Competitiveness and US Metropolitan Centres , 2012 .

[35]  Les Mayhew,et al.  OPTIMIZING THE BENEFITS OF URBAN ROAD USER CHARGING , 2002 .

[36]  P. Boland.  Unpacking the Theory-Policy Interface of Local Economic Development: An Analysis of Cardiff and Liverpool , 2007 .

[37]  Stephen Ison,et al.  The Economics of Transport: A Theoretical and Applied Perspective , 2009 .

[38]  Iain Docherty,et al.  Connecting for competitiveness: future transport in UK city regions , 2009 .

[39]  Michael Porter,et al.  The Economic Performance of Regions , 2003 .

[40]  R. Florida.  Cities and the Creative Class , 2003 .

[41]  R. Comunian.  Rethinking the Creative City , 2011 .

[42]  J. Macey.  Transaction Costs and the Normative Elements of the Public Choice Model: An Application to Constitutional Theory , 1988 .

[43]  B. Snowdon,et al.  Competitiveness in a globalised world: Michael Porter on the microeconomic foundations of the competitiveness of nations, regions, and firms , 2006 .

[44]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[45]  D. Simmonds,et al.  Integrated Transportation Land Use Models for Calculations of Wider Economic Benefit in Transport Schemes , 2008 .

[46]  J. Lovering.  THEORY LED BY POLICY? THE INADEQUACIES OF 'THE NEW REGIONALISM' IN ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY ILLUSTRATED FROM THE CASE OF WALES , 1998 .

[47]  G. Bristow.  Everyone's a 'winner': problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness , 2005 .

[48]  Roberto Camagni,et al.  On the Concept of Territorial Competitiveness: Sound or Misleading? , 2002 .

[49]  M. Porter.  Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy , 2000 .

[50]  Iain Docherty,et al.  The Transport Debate , 2014 .

[51]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[52]  R. Paddison,et al.  Sources of city prosperity and cohesion: the case of Glasgow and Edinburgh , 2004, City Matters.