CODE’s five-system orbit and clock solution—the challenges of multi-GNSS data analysis

This article describes the processing strategy and the validation results of CODE’s MGEX (COM) orbit and satellite clock solution, including the satellite systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS. The validation with orbit misclosures and SLR residuals shows that the orbits of the new systems Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS are affected by modelling deficiencies with impact on the orbit scale (e.g., antenna calibration, Earth albedo, and transmitter antenna thrust). Another weakness is the attitude and solar radiation pressure (SRP) modelling of satellites moving in the orbit normal mode—which is not yet correctly considered in the COM solution. Due to these issues, we consider the current state COM solution as preliminary. We, however, use the long-time series of COM products for identifying the challenges and for the assessment of model-improvements. The latter is demonstrated on the example of the solar radiation pressure (SRP) model, which has been replaced by a more generalized model. The SLR validation shows that the new SRP model significantly improves the orbit determination of Galileo and QZSS satellites at times when the satellite’s attitude is maintained by yaw-steering. The impact of this orbit improvement is also visible in the estimated satellite clocks—demonstrating the potential use of the new generation satellite clocks for orbit validation. Finally, we point out further challenges and open issues affecting multi-GNSS data processing that deserves dedicated studies.

[1]  Rolf Dach,et al.  IGS Technical Report 2014 , 2015 .

[2]  Stefan Schaer Bias and Calibration Working Group: IGS Technical Report 2011 , 2012 .

[3]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Orbit and clock analysis of Compass GEO and IGSO satellites , 2013, Journal of Geodesy.

[4]  Adrian Jäggi,et al.  The CODE MGEX Orbit and Clock Solution , 2015 .

[5]  Rolf Dach,et al.  IGS Technical Report 2012 , 2013 .

[6]  R. Dach,et al.  Bernese GNSS Software Version 5.2 , 2015 .

[7]  G. Beutler,et al.  A New Solar Radiation Pressure Model for GPS Satellites , 1999, GPS Solutions.

[8]  R. Dach,et al.  CODE’s new solar radiation pressure model for GNSS orbit determination , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[9]  Shinichi Nakasuka,et al.  An Evaluation of Solar Radiation Pressure Models for QZS-1 Precise Orbit Determination , 2013 .

[10]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Center for Orbit Determination in Europe: IGS Technical Report 2011 , 2012 .

[11]  Michael R Pearlman,et al.  THE INTERNATIONAL LASER RANGING SERVICE , 2007 .

[12]  A. S. Ganeshan,et al.  GNSS Satellite Geometry and Attitude Models , 2015 .

[13]  Florian Dilssner,et al.  The GLONASS-M satellite yaw-attitude model , 2011 .

[14]  Horst-Dieter Fischer,et al.  ATTITUDE & ORBIT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR GALILEO IOV* , 2007 .

[15]  Harald Schuh,et al.  Estimating the yaw-attitude of BDS IGSO and MEO satellites , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[16]  U. Hugentobler,et al.  Impact of Earth radiation pressure on GPS position estimates , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[17]  M. Ziebart Generalized Analytical Solar Radiation Pressure Modeling Algorithm for Spacecraft of Complex Shape , 2004 .

[18]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Galileo Orbit and Clock Quality of the IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment , 2015 .

[19]  Chris Rizos,et al.  The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems , 2009 .

[20]  Maik Uhlemann,et al.  GFZ Global Multi-GNSS Network and Data Processing Results , 2015 .

[21]  U. Hugentobler,et al.  Reducing the draconitic errors in GNSS geodetic products , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[22]  P. Steigenberger,et al.  Satellite laser ranging to GPS and GLONASS , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[23]  Michael Meindl,et al.  IGS Technical Report 2011 , 2012 .

[24]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Getting a Grip on Multi-GNSS: The International GNSS Service MGEX Campaign , 2013 .

[25]  P. Wolf,et al.  Test of the gravitational redshift with stable clocks in eccentric orbits: application to Galileo satellites 5 and 6 , 2015, 1508.06159.

[26]  L. Mervart,et al.  Extended orbit modeling techniques at the CODE processing center of the international GPS service for geodynamics (IGS): theory and initial results. , 1994 .

[27]  Jan Kouba,et al.  A simplified yaw-attitude model for eclipsing GPS satellites , 2009 .

[28]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Estimation of satellite antenna phase center offsets for Galileo , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[29]  Qile Zhao,et al.  Precise orbit determination for quad-constellation satellites at Wuhan University: strategy, result validation, and comparison , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[30]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Flight Characterization of New Generation GNSS Satellite Clocks , 2011 .

[31]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Impact of the arc length on GNSS analysis results , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[32]  Yoaz E. Bar-Sever,et al.  A new model for GPS yaw attitude , 1996 .

[33]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  GIOVE-B solar radiation pressure modeling for precise orbit determination , 2015 .

[34]  Noriyasu Inaba,et al.  Design and development of the first Quasi-Zenith Satellite attitude and orbit control system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.

[35]  Gerald L. Mader,et al.  GPS Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey , 1999, GPS Solutions.

[36]  Adrian Jäggi,et al.  New RINEX file monitoring at CODE , 2013 .

[37]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Enhanced solar radiation pressure modeling for Galileo satellites , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[38]  M. Meindl,et al.  GNSS processing at CODE: status report , 2009 .