Chemotactic adaptation kinetics of individual Escherichia coli cells

Escherichia coli chemotaxis serves as a paradigm for the way living cells respond and adapt to changes in their environment. The chemotactic response has been characterized at the level of individual flagellar motors and in populations of swimming cells. However, it has not been previously possible to quantify accurately the adaptive response of a single, multiflagellated cell. Here, we use our recently developed optical trapping technique to characterize the swimming behavior of individual bacteria as they respond to sudden changes in the chemical environment. We follow the adaptation kinetics of E. coli to varying magnitudes of step-up and step-down changes in concentration of chemoattractant. We quantify two features of adaptation and how they vary with stimulus strength: abruptness (the degree to which return to prestimulus behavior occurs within a small number of run/tumble events) and overshoot (the degree of excessive response before the return to prestimulus behavior). We also characterize the asymmetry between step-up and step-down responses, observed at the single-cell level. Our findings provide clues to an improved understanding of chemotactic adaptation.

[1]  L. Kiessling,et al.  Large increases in attractant concentration disrupt the polar localization of bacterial chemoreceptors , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. , 1993, Science.

[3]  C. V. Rao,et al.  Attractant Binding Induces Distinct Structural Changes to the Polar and Lateral Signaling Clusters in Bacillus subtilis Chemotaxis* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  H. Berg,et al.  Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Synchronization of rotating helices by hydrodynamic interactions , 2004, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[6]  Hiroto Takahashi,et al.  Coordinated reversal of flagellar motors on a single Escherichia coli cell. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  On Torque and Tumbling in Swimming Escherichia coli , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  Chuck Yeung,et al.  Swimming efficiency of bacterium Escherichia coli , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  D. Koshland,et al.  Quantitation of the sensory response in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Laura L Kiessling,et al.  Chemical probes of bacterial signal transduction reveal that repellents stabilize and attractants destabilize the chemoreceptor array. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[11]  Christopher V. Rao,et al.  High-resolution, long-term characterization of bacterial motility using optical tweezers , 2009, Nature Methods.

[12]  J. Stock,et al.  Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis. , 2006, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[13]  Ann M Stock,et al.  Activation of methylesterase CheB: evidence of a dual role for the regulatory domain. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[14]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  Adaptation at the output of the chemotaxis signalling pathway , 2012, Nature.

[15]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Interdependence of behavioural variability and response to small stimuli in bacteria , 2010, Nature.

[16]  Thierry Emonet,et al.  Stochastic coordination of multiple actuators reduces latency and improves chemotactic response in bacteria , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  S. Leibler,et al.  An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. , 2000, Science.

[18]  Uri Alon,et al.  Response regulator output in bacterial chemotaxis , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[19]  Nikita Vladimirov,et al.  Predicted Auxiliary Navigation Mechanism of Peritrichously Flagellated Chemotactic Bacteria , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Precision and kinetics of adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Thierry Emonet,et al.  Hidden stochastic nature of a single bacterial motor. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[22]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[23]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Isolation and behavior of Escherichia coli deletion mutants lacking chemotaxis functions , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  Davi R. Ortega,et al.  Universal architecture of bacterial chemoreceptor arrays , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Self-Organization of the Escherichia coli Chemotaxis Network Imaged with Super-Resolution Light Microscopy , 2009, PLoS biology.

[26]  H. Berg,et al.  A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[27]  Daniel E. Koshland,et al.  Neither methylating nor demethylating enzymes are required for bacterial chemotaxis , 1985, Cell.

[28]  G. P. Reid,et al.  Chemotactic responses of Escherichia coli to small jumps of photoreleased L-aspartate. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[29]  H. Berg,et al.  Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  H. Berg.  The rotary motor of bacterial flagella. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[31]  Monica L. Skoge,et al.  Chemosensing in Escherichia coli: two regimes of two-state receptors. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[33]  H. Berg,et al.  Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  R. Macnab,et al.  The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[36]  D. Koshland,et al.  Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell , 1976, Nature.

[37]  William S. Ryu,et al.  Real-Time Imaging of Fluorescent Flagellar Filaments , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[38]  Receptor interactions through phosphorylation and methylation pathways in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  R. Macnab,et al.  Asynchronous switching of flagellar motors on a single bacterial cell , 1983, Cell.

[40]  N. Wingreen,et al.  A dynamic-signaling-team model for chemotaxis receptors in Escherichia coli , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  Effects of adaptation in maintaining high sensitivity over a wide range of backgrounds for Escherichia coli chemotaxis. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[42]  H. Berg,et al.  Coordination of flagella on filamentous cells of Escherichia coli , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[43]  Tuba Altindal,et al.  Bacterial Chemotaxis in an Optical Trap , 2011, PloS one.

[44]  H. Berg,et al.  Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  M. Simon,et al.  Flagellar rotation and the mechanism of bacterial motility , 1974, Nature.

[46]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[47]  Karen A. Fahrner,et al.  Control of direction of flagellar rotation in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.