An Insider's Look into Policy Transfer in Transnational Expert Networks

Abstract Much of the recent academic literature on spatial planning in Europe focuses on either cross-national comparison of planning frameworks and planning practices or on transnational and transregional initiatives and their impact on planning in European countries. From those publications, it can be gleaned how similar themes are translated differentially in different national contexts. Although it is also a great source of European integration and harmonization, the phenomenon of the knowledge exchange within transnational expert networks of European planners at the level of cities has received less attention. In this paper, the knowledge exchange among planners in such a network is studied, highlighting the role of “transfer agents” (academic and/or policy experts operating in communities in different policy arenas) in the exchange process. It builds on the insights from existing literature on policy transfer and policy learning, and tries to add a new perspective on this body of literature from an insiders' perspective, i.e. participatory observation. The idea is that policy transfer can be fruitfully approached as a process of knowledge and information transfer between producers, senders, facilitators and recipients. Often this exchange is to a very large extent a process of absorbing appealing labels for policy solutions from the international or national policy levels, and then adopting an interpretation of it suitable to one's own context. The authors try to give meaning to this exchange process by using two mechanisms, i.e. social interaction and conceptual replication. By combining these two mechanisms the authors try to uncover which policy lessons are being transferred among seven European cities that joined the expert network on European sustainable urban development (Pegasus).

[1]  Max Elden,et al.  Cogenerative Learning: Bringing Participation into Action Research , 1991 .

[2]  F. Bougrain,et al.  Sustainable Neighbourhood Rehabilitation in Europe , 2002 .

[3]  E. Page,et al.  Policy Transfer among Local Governments: An Information–Theory Approach , 2002 .

[4]  Georgia Giannakourou Transforming spatial planning policy in Mediterranean countries: Europeanization and domestic change , 2005 .

[5]  C. Weiss Using social research in public policy making , 1979 .

[6]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[7]  Christoph Knill The Europeanisation of National Administrations , 2001 .

[8]  D. Greenwood,et al.  Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change , 1998 .

[9]  D. Hull,et al.  Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, David L. Hull. 1988. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 608 pages. ISBN: 0-226-35060-4. $39.95 , 1989 .

[10]  W. Jacoby Imitation and Politics: Redesigning Modern Germany , 2000 .

[11]  Oliver James,et al.  The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research , 2003 .

[12]  Manuel Castells,et al.  Technopoles of the World: The Making of Twenty-First-Century Industrial Complexes , 1994 .

[13]  Martin de Jong,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation , 2002 .

[14]  Gert Schout,et al.  Communities of Practice. Bronnen van inspiratie. , 2005 .

[15]  E. Klijn,et al.  Managing Uncertainties in Networks a Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making , 2004 .

[16]  A. Beringer,et al.  to action research , 2022 .

[17]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction , 1993 .

[18]  A. Faludi,et al.  The hidden face of European spatial planning: innovations in governance , 2005 .

[19]  Colin J. Bennett,et al.  The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change , 1992 .

[20]  J. Launer Darwin's dangerous idea. , 2002, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[21]  K. Brock,et al.  Knowing Poverty: Critical Reflections on Participatory Research and Policy , 2002 .

[22]  E. Gualini New programming and the influence of transnational discourses in the reform of regional policy in Italy , 2001 .

[23]  Christoph Knill,et al.  Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence , 2005 .

[24]  Michael Huberman,et al.  Research utilization: The state of the art , 1994 .

[25]  Richard Rose,et al.  Lesson-drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space , 1993 .

[26]  Joop Koppenjan,et al.  Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector , 1997 .

[27]  D. Stone Non‐Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes , 2000 .

[28]  E. Wenger,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[29]  S. Padgett Between synthesis and emulation: EU policy transfer in the power sector , 2003 .

[30]  S. Abdi Darwin Machines and the Nature of Knowledge , 1995 .

[31]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[32]  Richard Rose,et al.  What is Lesson-Drawing? , 1991, Journal of Public Policy.

[33]  D. Liefferink The Europeanisation of National Administrations. Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence , 2003 .

[34]  Lyn M. Shulha,et al.  Evaluation Use: Theory, Research, and Practice since 1986 , 1997 .

[35]  D. Campbell,et al.  Evolutionary Epistemology Bibliography , 1987 .

[36]  Claudio M. Radaelli,et al.  The diffusion of regulatory impact analysis – Best practice or lesson‐drawing? , 2004 .

[37]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy‐Making , 2000 .

[38]  Carol H. Weiss,et al.  Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion , 1980 .

[39]  C. Kalantaridis A study into the localization of rural businesses in five European countries , 2006 .

[40]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[41]  A. Héritier,et al.  Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policymaking , 2001 .

[42]  M. Jong The pitfalls of family resemblance: why transferring planning institutions between ‘similar countries’ is delicate business , 2004 .

[43]  K. Mossberger The Politics of Ideas and the Spread of Enterprise Zones , 2000 .

[44]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Co-opetition : 1. a revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation : 2. the game theory strategy that's changing the game of business , 1998 .

[45]  Virginie Mamadouh,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation: Experiences with the Transfer of Policy Institutions , 2008 .

[46]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[47]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature , 1996 .

[48]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems : the role of governances in a globalized world , 1998 .

[49]  Martin Lodge,et al.  Institutional choice and policy transfer: reforming British and German railway regulation , 2003 .

[50]  P. Cooke Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy , 2001 .

[51]  E. Zemach Human understanding , 1992, Synthese.

[52]  G. Ferro-Luzzi On Evolutionary Epistemology , 1982, Current Anthropology.

[53]  S. Iammarino An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives , 2005 .

[54]  A. Watson Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law , 1988 .

[55]  Mark Tewdwr-Jones,et al.  The European Dimension of British Planning , 2001 .

[56]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  Why is joint knowledge production such a problem , 2004 .

[57]  D. Stone Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy , 2004 .

[58]  D. Eleanor Westney Imitation and innovation : the transfer of Western organizational patterns to Meiji Japan , 1989 .

[59]  I. Greener,et al.  Understanding NHS reform : the policy-transfer, social learning and path dependency perspectives. , 2002 .