Effects of Mutual Coupling of Radiating Antennas on an Adaptive Radar Detector

In this paper, we address the adaptive detection/classification of signals in a homogenous interference environment. We refer to a radar system equipped with a phased array antenna and account for both the presence of mutual coupling between radiating antennas and a possible coherent interferer impinging on the array mainbeam. To deal with this scenario, we adopt a two-stage detection/classification scheme, enjoying the Costant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) property, to discriminate between target detection and coherent interferer rejection. Finally, we evaluate the system performance via Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that our system has interesting rejection capabilities and satisfactory detection levels. As a consequence, it could be successfully applied in real scenarios where mutual coupling is present. Keywords—Adaptive radar detection, mutual coupling effects between radiating elements, constant false alarm rate, interference rejection.

[1]  A. De Maio,et al.  ECM counteracting SLB: Analysis and effectiveness evaluation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Radar Conference.

[2]  L. Lechtreck Effects of coupling accumulation in antenna arrays , 1968 .

[3]  A. Fenn Adaptive Antennas and Phased Arrays for Radar and Communications , 2007 .

[4]  Antonio De Maio,et al.  Rao Test for Adaptive Detection in Gaussian Interference With Unknown Covariance Matrix , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Danilo Orlando,et al.  Detection Algorithms to Discriminate Between Radar Targets and ECM Signals , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Alfonso Farina,et al.  Antenna-Based Signal Processing Techniques for Radar Systems , 1992 .

[7]  Olivier Besson,et al.  An Improved Adaptive Sidelobe Blanker , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Christ D. Richmond,et al.  Performance of the adaptive sidelobe blanker detection algorithm in homogeneous environments , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[9]  P. Hannan The element-gain paradox for a phased-array antenna , 1964 .

[10]  A. Farina,et al.  Adaptive strategies for discrimination between mainlobe and sidelobe signals , 2010, 2010 IEEE Radar Conference.

[11]  E. J. Kelly An Adaptive Detection Algorithm , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  Antonio De Maio,et al.  Robust adaptive detection with angular rejection , 2009, Symposium on Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments (WILGA).

[13]  A. Farina,et al.  Adaptive radar detection in the presence of mutual coupling and near-field effects , 2008 .

[14]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[15]  D. Pozar The active element pattern , 1994 .

[16]  Lieven Vandenberghe,et al.  Discrete Transforms, Semidefinite Programming, and Sum-of-Squares Representations of Nonnegative Polynomials , 2006, SIAM J. Optim..

[17]  N. Amitay,et al.  Theory and analysis of phased array antennas , 1972 .

[18]  G. Borgiotti,et al.  Modal analysis of periodic planar phased arrays of apertures , 1968 .

[19]  Johan Löfberg,et al.  YALMIP : a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB , 2004 .

[20]  V. Galindo,et al.  On the asymptotic decay of coupling for infinite phased arrays , 1968 .

[21]  I. Reed,et al.  Rapid Convergence Rate in Adaptive Arrays , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[22]  A. Farina,et al.  Performance analysis of sidelobe blanking system in presence of mutual coupling , 2007 .

[23]  G. Borgiotti A novel expression for the mutual admittance of planar radiating elements , 1967 .

[24]  Jos F. Sturm,et al.  A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones , 1999 .

[25]  A. Farina,et al.  Adaptive detection of a signal with angle uncertainty , 2010 .

[26]  Constantine A. Balanis,et al.  Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design , 1982 .