Comparing questions with agree/ disagree response options to questions with item-specific response options

Although Agree/Disagree (A/D) rating scales are hugely popular in the social sciences, a large body of research conducted during more than five decades has documented the bias that results from acquiescence in responses to these items. This may be a reason to prefer questions with Item Specific (IS) response options, but remarkably little research has explored whether responses to A/D rating scale questions are indeed of lower quality than responses to questions with IS response options. Using a research design that combines the advantages of a random assignment between-subjects experiment and the multitrait-multimethod approach in the context of representative sample surveys, we found that responses to A/D rating scale questions indeed had much lower quality than responses to comparable questions offering IS response options. These results attest to the superiority of questions with IS response options.

[1]  P. Wason,et al.  NEGATIVES: DENOTATION AND CONNOTATION. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[2]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures of political attitudes , 1970 .

[3]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Violating conversational conventions disrupts cognitive processing of attitude questions , 2000 .

[4]  John R. Dickinson,et al.  Questionnaire item omission as a function of within-group question position , 1985 .

[5]  D. Aderman,et al.  On the Recall of Initial Attitudes following Counterattitudinal Advocacy: An Experimental Reexamination , 1976 .

[6]  H. Marsh,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Multitrait-Multimethod Data: A Comparison of Alternative Models , 1991 .

[7]  C. T. Salmon,et al.  The Next-Birthday Method of Respondent Selection , 1983 .

[8]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Generality of the effects of practice on social judgment tasks. , 1988 .

[9]  Rivka R. Eifermann,et al.  Negation: A linguistic variable , 1961 .

[10]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Storage and verification stages in processing concepts. , 1971 .

[11]  Allen I. Kraut,et al.  Some effects of position on opinion survey items. , 1975 .

[12]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  The Impact of "No Opinion" Response Options on Data Quality: Non-Attitude Reduction or an Invitation to Satisfice? , 2001 .

[13]  Annette Scherpenzeel,et al.  The Evaluation of Measurement Instruments By Meta-Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Studies , 1993 .

[14]  P. Wason The contexts of plausible denial , 1965 .

[15]  Y. Ying,et al.  Nonresponse On the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale in Chinese Americans , 1989, The International journal of social psychiatry.

[16]  P. C. Wason,et al.  The Processing of Positive and Negative Information , 1959 .

[17]  E. R. Wembridge Obscurities in voting upon measures due to double-negative. , 1918 .

[18]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  8. A New Approach to Evaluating the Quality of Measurement Instruments: The Split-Ballot MTMM Design , 2004 .

[19]  R. Jowell Measuring attitudes cross-nationally : lessons from the European social survey , 2007 .

[20]  Michael Eid,et al.  A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions , 2000 .

[21]  Robert Ferber,et al.  ITEM NONRESPONSE IN A CONSUMER SURVEY , 1966 .

[22]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  Fit of Different Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Experiments , 2002 .

[23]  P. Wason,et al.  Response to affirmative and negative binary statements. , 1961, British journal of psychology.

[24]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures of social psychological attitudes, Revised ed. , 1973 .

[25]  J. Ray The Comparative Validity of Likert, Projective, and Forced-Choice Indices of Achievement Motivation , 1980 .

[26]  J. Laird,et al.  Awareness and attitude change in the forced-compliance paradigm: The importance of when. , 1976 .

[27]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  Different Explanations for Correlated Disturbance Terms in MTMM Studies , 2003 .

[28]  J. Ray A quick measure of achievement motivation—validated in Australia and reliable in Britain and South Africa , 1979 .

[29]  D. Alwin Approaches to the Interpretation of Relationships in the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix , 1973 .

[30]  J. M. Smith A quick measure of achievement motivation. , 1973, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[31]  David Rindskopf,et al.  Structural Equation Models , 1984 .

[32]  G. Wolkon,et al.  A Forced Choice Form of the F Scale-Free of Acquiescent Response Set , 1964 .

[33]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  The Reliability of Survey Attitude Measurement , 1991 .

[34]  Kevin J. Clancy,et al.  POSITIONAL EFFECTS IN SHARED-COST SURVEYS , 1971 .

[35]  Roland Hausser,et al.  Principles of Pragmatics , 1989 .

[36]  Leona E. Tyler,et al.  Scales for the Measurement of Attitudes. , 1967 .

[37]  F. M. Andrews Construct Validity and Error Components of Survey Measures: A Structural Modeling Approach , 1984 .

[38]  P. Converse The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[39]  J. J. Donovan,et al.  A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. , 1999 .

[40]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation , 1995 .

[41]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures of social psychological attitudes , 1976 .

[42]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  Memory effects in MTMM studies , 1995 .

[43]  D. Bem,et al.  Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: on the salience of premanipulation attitudes. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  M. Yamagishi,et al.  The Influence of Labels and Positions in Rating Scales , 1988 .

[45]  Jaak Billiet,et al.  Het survey-interview onderzocht. Effecten van het ontwerp en gebruik van vragenlijsten op de kwaliteit van de antwoorden , 1984 .

[46]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models or Detection of Misspecifications? , 2009 .

[47]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  Evaluation of Measurement Instruments Using a Structural Modeling Approach , 2011 .

[48]  R. Voogt,et al.  'I¿m not interested¿. Nonresponse bias, response bias and stimulus effects in election research , 2000 .

[49]  A. C. Scherpenzeel A Question of Quality. Evaluating survey questions by multitrait-multimethod studies , 1995 .

[50]  Arthur H. Miller,et al.  American national election studies data sourcebook, 1952-1978 , 1981 .

[51]  R. Petty,et al.  The need to evaluate. , 1996 .

[52]  M A Just,et al.  The relation between comprehending and remembering some complex sentences , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[53]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. , 1975 .

[54]  L. Rips,et al.  The Psychology of Survey Response , 2000 .

[55]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[56]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Evaluation of Measurement Instruments by Meta-Analysis of Multitrait Multimethod Studies. , 1992 .

[57]  M. Ross,et al.  Increasing the salience of initial attitudes: dissonance versus self-perception theory. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  Gösta Forsman,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Reinterview: An Overview , 2011 .

[59]  J. Sinacore,et al.  A Comparative Study of Seven Measures of Patient Satisfaction , 1995, Medical care.

[60]  George R. Goethals,et al.  The Perception of Consistency in Attitudes. , 1973 .

[61]  Willem E. Saris Variation in response functions : a source of measurement error in attitude research , 1988 .

[62]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Item context effects on personality scales: Measuring changes the measure. , 1988 .

[63]  S. Presser,et al.  Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context , 1996 .

[64]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  A TEST OF THE FORM-RESISTANT CORRELATION HYPOTHESIS RATINGS, RANKINGS, AND THE MEASUREMENT OF VALUES , 1988 .

[65]  Peter Lynn,et al.  How representative can a multi-nation survey be? , 2007 .

[66]  J. Fodor Psychology and Language. , 1970 .

[67]  J. Bachman,et al.  Effects of Questionnaire Length on Response Quality , 1981 .

[68]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research , 2007 .

[69]  A. Dudycha,et al.  Effects of Item Format on Item Discrimination and Difficulty. , 1973 .

[70]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[71]  Albert Satorra,et al.  Asymptotic robust inferences in the analysis of mean and covariance structures , 1992 .

[72]  M. Counte An examination of the convergent validity of three measures of patient satisfaction in an outpatient treatment center. , 1979, Journal of chronic diseases.

[73]  J. Mehler Some effects of grammatical transformations on the recall of english sentences , 1963 .

[74]  P. Allison Estimation of Linear Models with Incomplete Data , 1987 .

[75]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content , 1972 .

[76]  John C. Leggett,et al.  Caste, Class, and Deference in the Research Interview , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.

[77]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding , 1965 .

[78]  D. R. Shaffer Some effects of consonant and dissonant attitudinal advocacy on initial attitude salience and attitude change. , 1975 .

[79]  T. Millon,et al.  Personality and social psychology , 2003 .

[80]  C. N. Cofer,et al.  Verbal learning and verbal behavior. , 1961 .

[81]  D. R. Shaffer Another Look at the Phenomenological Equivalence of Pre- and Postmanipulation Attitudes in the Forced-compliance Experiment1 , 1975 .

[82]  D. Slobin Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood , 1966 .

[83]  J. Krosnick Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[84]  Leslie G. Carr,et al.  The Srole Items and Acquiescence , 1971 .

[85]  Achim Koch,et al.  Understanding and improving response rates , 2007 .

[86]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. , 1988 .

[87]  J. Harkness Improving the Comparability of Translations , 2007 .

[88]  M. Browne,et al.  The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[89]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Analysis of the multitrait^multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis , 1992 .