Comparison of univariate and multivariate magnitude-squared coherences in the detection of human 40-Hz auditory steady-state evoked responses

Abstract Objective response detection (ORD) techniques for evaluating bioelectrical evoked responses in the electroencephalogram (EEG) are based on statistical criteria rather than on visual inspection. Hence, they do not depend on human evaluation, which is often a subjective approach. Furthermore, since such techniques do not involve heuristic approaches, they may be more easily implemented and used in automatic systems. The Magnitude-Squared Coherence (MSC), together with its recently developed multivariate extension (the multiple magnitude-squared coherence – MMSC), have been pointed out as one of the most efficient ORD techniques for detecting steady-state responses in the EEG. In this work, both MSC and MMSC were applied to EEG signals collected during auditory stimulation in order to allow comparison in the detection of auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs). The stimuli consisted of 40 Hz amplitude-modulated tones delivered binaurally in the intensity of 50 dB SPL (sound pressure level). The best result was obtained by using MMSC in the two-electrode set C4 and Fz. This configuration led to a 0.92-detection ratio, within 111.55 s in average to detect each response and kept the false alarm ratio under 0.05. The average improvement in performance was about 11% when compared to the MSC. These results allow concluding that the detection protocol of 40 Hz ASSRs can be improved by using MMSC in multichannel EEG analysis when compared to the traditional univariate MSC approach.

[1]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[2]  John D. Enderle,et al.  Introduction to Biomedical Engineering , 1999 .

[3]  M. S. John,et al.  MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[4]  A. Nuttall Invariance of distribution of coherence estimate to second-channel statistics , 1981 .

[5]  A spatial approach of magnitude-squared coherence applied to selective attention detection , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  L. B. Felix,et al.  A matrix-based algorithm for estimating multiple coherence of a periodic signal and its application to the multichannel EEG during sensory stimulation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Jennifer L. Smart,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[8]  C. Strauss,et al.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses , 2017, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[9]  Ernesto Rodríguez,et al.  New system for neonatal hearing screening based on auditory steady state responses , 2013, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[10]  J. Shaw Correlation and coherence analysis of the EEG: a selective tutorial review. , 1984, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  Antonio Fernando C. Infantosi,et al.  A multiple coherence-based detector for evoked responses in the EEG during sensory stimulation , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  L. B. Felix,et al.  Improving the detection of evoked responses to periodic stimulation by using multiple coherence--application to EEG during photic stimulation. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  Antonio Fernando Catelli Infantosi,et al.  Multivariate Objective Response Detectors (MORD): Statistical Tools for Multichannel EEG Analysis During Rhythmic Stimulation , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Allan H. Ropper,et al.  Evoked potentials in clinical medicine (second of two parts). , 1982 .

[15]  S. Makeig,et al.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1987 .

[17]  R A Dobie,et al.  Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[18]  A. M. F. L. M. de Sá,et al.  A note on the sampling distribution of coherence estimate for the detection of periodic signals , 2004, IEEE Signal Process. Lett..

[19]  Gavin M Bidelman,et al.  Objective information-theoretic algorithm for detecting brainstem-evoked responses to complex stimuli. , 2014, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[20]  Leonardo Bonato Felix,et al.  A spatial coherence-based vision-free brain-computer interface using auditory selective attention , 2015 .

[21]  G. Carter,et al.  Estimation of the magnitude-squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing , 1973 .

[22]  T W Picton,et al.  Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.