Efficiently measuring complex sessile epibenthic organisms using a novel photogrammetric technique

Abstract This paper describes a stereo photogrammetry method that allows accurate measurements of volume for sessile epibenthic organisms. It represents a novel approach based on multiple views (five stereo image pairs) from a purpose built stereo digital still camera system combined with a three-dimensional reconstruction software program (CAM). The bias, accuracy, precision and efficiency of the method were assessed in the laboratory using models with three levels of morphological complexity (simple, moderate and complex morphologies) and two sizes (large and small). The technique did not show any biases to observer experience, with no significant difference among observers ( p  > 0.05). Volume measurements made with CAM were very accurate when compared with the water displacement volume of each model, with an overall mean error of about − 3% (S.E. ± 1%). The CAM volume measurements were more accurate on complex models and moderately complex models than on models with simple morphologies. Also, large models had a higher accuracy than small models. Volume measurements made with CAM were also highly precise with the lowest precision observed being ± 2% of the volume estimate. The time required for a volume estimation using the CAM method was also highly efficient, and the longest time taken for a volume estimation was on average 1 h and 36 min, making it the fastest reported three-dimensional reconstruction method. In field applications, volume estimations of four sponges were all within the observed accuracy, precision and efficiency established during laboratory trials. The accuracy, precision and efficiency demonstrated by the CAM method make this technique highly suitable for routine measurements of the volume of sessile epibenthic organisms.

[1]  Stuart Robson,et al.  The accuracy and precision of underwater measurements of length and maximum body depth of southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) with a stereo-video camera system , 2003 .

[2]  N. Andrew,et al.  Sampling and the description of spatial pattern in marine ecology , 1987 .

[3]  M. Kingsford,et al.  Studying temperate marine environments : a handbook for ecologists , 2000 .

[4]  K. McGuinness,et al.  Environmentally influenced variability in the morphology of Cinachyrella australiensis (Carter 1886) (Porifera: Spirophorida: Tetillidae) , 2002 .

[5]  G. E. Fogg,et al.  Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos. , 1972 .

[6]  D. Elvin.  SEASONAL GROWTH AND REPRODUCTION OF AN INTERTIDAL SPONGE, HALICLONA PERMOLLIS (BOWERBANK) , 1976 .

[7]  M. Úriz,et al.  Trends in space occupation by the encrusting sponge Crambe crambe: variation in shape as a function of size and environment , 1994 .

[8]  Euan S. Harvey,et al.  A comparison of the precision and accuracy of estimates of reef-fish lengths determined visually by divers with estimates produced by a stereo-video system. , 2001 .

[9]  D. Barnes,et al.  The influences of bathymetry and flow regime upon the morphology of sublittoral sponge communities , 2000, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[10]  Jaap A. Kaandorp,et al.  Morphological analysis of growth forms of branching marine sessile organisms along environmental gradients , 1999 .

[11]  P A Hancock,et al.  Task performance under water. An evaluation of manual dexterity efficiency in the open ocean underwater environment. , 1986, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  S. Robson,et al.  An analysis of the calibration stability and measurement accuracy of an underwater stereo-video system used for shellfish surveys. , 2000 .

[13]  Euan S. Harvey,et al.  Calibration stability of an underwater stereo-video system : Implications for measurement accuracy and precision , 1998 .

[14]  Graham J. Edgar,et al.  The use of the size structure of benthic macrofaunal communities to estimate faunal biomass and secondary production , 1990 .

[15]  Shortis,et al.  A System for Stereo-Video Measurement of Sub-Tidal Organisms: Implications for assessments of reef fish stocks , 1995 .

[16]  A. Duckworth,et al.  Population dynamics and chemical ecology of New Zealand Demospongiae Latrunculia sp. nov. and Polymastia croceus (Poecilosclerida: Latrunculiidae: Polymastiidae) , 2001 .

[17]  Terence Done,et al.  Photogrammetry in coral ecology: a technique for the study of change in coral communities , 1982 .

[18]  M. Powell,et al.  Treatment of spionid mud worm (Boccardia knoxi Rainer) infestation of cultured abalone , 2003 .

[19]  M. Shortis,et al.  Estimation of reef fish length by divers and by stereo-video A first comparison of the accuracy and precision in the field on living fish under operational conditions , 2002 .

[20]  K. McGuinness,et al.  Influence of re-orientation on alignment to flow and tissue production in a Spongia sp. (Porifera:Demospongiae:Dictyoceratida) , 2003 .

[21]  A. Duckworth,et al.  Sponge aquaculture for the production of biologically active metabolites: the influence of farming protocols and environment , 2003 .

[22]  M. Shortis,et al.  Improving the statistical power of length estimates of reef fish: a comparison of estimates determined visually by divers with estimates produced by a stereo-video system. , 2001 .

[23]  D. Barthel.  On the ecophysiology of the sponge Halichondria panicea in Kiel Bight. II. Biomass, production, energy budget and integration in environmental processes , 1988 .

[24]  S. Leys,et al.  Hexactinellid sponge ecology: growth rates and seasonality in deep water sponges , 1998 .

[25]  D. Barthel.  On the ecophysiology of the sponge Halichondria panicea in Kiel Bight. I. Substrate specificity, growth and reproduction , 1986 .

[26]  S. Palumbi,et al.  Tactics of Acclimation: Morphological Changes of Sponges in an Unpredictable Environment , 1984, Science.

[27]  Wolfgang Faig,et al.  An Evaluation of an Off-the-shelf Digital Close- Range Photogrammetric Software Package , 2001 .

[28]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Transplantation of marine sponges to different conditions of light and current , 1979 .

[29]  A. L. Ayling.  GROWTH AND REGENERATION RATES IN THINLY ENCRUSTING DEMOSPONGIAE FROM TEMPERATE WATERS. , 1983, The Biological bulletin.

[30]  B. Würsig,et al.  A combined stereo-photogrammetry and underwater-video system to study group composition of dolphins , 1999, Helgoland Marine Research.

[31]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Randomized incremental construction of Delaunay and Voronoi diagrams , 1990, Algorithmica.

[32]  A. Duckworth,et al.  Developing farming structures for production of biologically active sponge metabolites , 2003 .

[33]  J. Bythell,et al.  Three-dimensional morphometric measurements of reef corals using underwater photogrammetry techniques , 2001, Coral Reefs.

[34]  W. S Whyte.  Revision notes on plane surveying , 1971 .

[35]  A. Duckworth,et al.  Influence of explant procedures and environmental factors on culture success of three sponges , 1997 .

[36]  A. Duckworth.  Effect of wound size on the growth and regeneration of two temperate subtidal sponges , 2003 .

[37]  S. Handley,et al.  Non‐destructive video image analysis method for measuring growth in sponge farming: Preliminary results from the New Zealand bath‐sponge Spongia (Heterofibria) manipulatus , 2003 .

[38]  A. S. S. Hameed,et al.  Biochemical, physiological and hematological changes in white spot syndrome virus-infected shrimp, Penaeus indicus , 2003 .

[39]  S. Palumbi.  How body plans limit acclimation: responses of a demosponge to wave force , 1986 .

[40]  D. Schiel,et al.  Effects of depth and water flow on growth, survival and bioactivity of two temperate sponges cultured in different seasons , 2004 .