Sparse decision feedback equalization for underwater acoustic channel based on minimum symbol error rate

Abstract Underwater Acoustic Channels (UAC) have inherent sparse characteristics. The traditional adaptive equalization techniques do not utilize this feature to improve the performance. In this paper we consider the Variable Adaptive Subgradient Projection (V-ASPM) method to derive a new sparse equalization algorithm based on the Minimum Symbol Error Rate (MSER) criterion. Compared with the original MSER algorithm, our proposed scheme adds sparse matrix to the iterative formula, which can assign independent step-sizes to the equalizer taps. How to obtain such proper sparse matrix is also analyzed. On this basis, the selection scheme of the sparse matrix is obtained by combining the variable step-sizes and equalizer sparsity measure. We call the new algorithm Sparse-Control Proportional-MSER (SC-PMSER) equalizer. Finally, the proposed SC-PMSER equalizer is embedded into a turbo receiver, which perform turbo decoding, Digital Phase-Locked Loop (DPLL), time-reversal receiving and multi-reception diversity. Simulation and real-field experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has better performance in convergence speed and Bit Error Rate (BER).

[1]  Konstantinos Pelekanakis,et al.  Comparison of sparse adaptive filters for underwater acoustic channel equalization/Estimation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems.

[2]  Xue Feng,et al.  Sparse Equalizer Filter Design for Multi-path Channels , 2012 .

[3]  Miaowen Wen,et al.  Minimum Symbol-Error Rate Based Adaptive Decision Feedback Equalizer in Underwater Acoustic Channels , 2017, IEEE Access.

[4]  J. A. Catipovic,et al.  Phase-coherent digital communications for underwater acoustic channels , 1994 .

[5]  Hua Yu,et al.  Spatial and Time-Reversal Diversity Aided Least-Symbol-Error-Rate Turbo Receiver for Underwater Acoustic Communications , 2018, IEEE Access.

[6]  Andrew C. Singer,et al.  Signal processing for underwater acoustic communications , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Donald L. Duttweiler,et al.  Proportionate normalized least-mean-squares adaptation in echo cancelers , 2000, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[8]  Huang Jianguo,et al.  An improved direct adaptive multichannel turbo equalization scheme for underwater communications , 2012, 2012 Oceans - Yeosu.

[9]  Hua Yu,et al.  Normalized Adaptive Channel Equalizer Based on Minimal Symbol-Error-Rate , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Sparse equalization for real-time digital underwater acoustic communications , 1995, 'Challenges of Our Changing Global Environment'. Conference Proceedings. OCEANS '95 MTS/IEEE.

[11]  Yahong Rosa Zheng,et al.  Enhanced adaptive equalization for MIMO underwater acoustic communications , 2017, OCEANS 2017 – Anchorage.

[12]  Yuanxin Xu,et al.  Doppler estimation and timing synchronization of underwater acoustic communication based on hyperbolic frequency modulation signal , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control.

[13]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse channel estimation via matching pursuit with application to equalization , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[14]  Patrik O. Hoyer,et al.  Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Sparseness Constraints , 2004, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Adaptive minimum error-rate filtering design: A review , 2008, Signal Process..

[16]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Adaptive minimum symbol-error-rate decision feedback equalization for multilevel pulse-amplitude modulation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[18]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  MBER Space-Time Decision Feedback Equalization Assisted Multiuser Detection for Multiple Antenna Aided SDMA Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[19]  M. Chitre,et al.  New Sparse Adaptive Algorithms Based on the Natural Gradient and the ${L}_{0}$ -Norm , 2013, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[20]  Kevin B. Smith,et al.  Underwater acoustic communication channel simulation using parabolic equation , 2011, WUWNet.

[21]  Yanbo Wu,et al.  Sparse linear equalizers for turbo equalizations in underwater acoustic communication , 2015, OCEANS 2015 - MTS/IEEE Washington.

[22]  Mrityunjoy Chakraborty,et al.  Improving the Performance of the PNLMS Algorithm Using $l_1$ Norm Regularization , 2016, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[23]  Hua Yu,et al.  Least-symbol-error-rate adaptive decision feedback equalization for underwater channel , 2013, WUWNet.

[24]  Isao Yamada,et al.  A Unified View of Adaptive Variable-Metric Projection Algorithms , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[25]  Markus Rupp,et al.  Robustness conditions of the LMS algorithm with time-variant matrix step-size , 2000, Signal Process..

[26]  Jun Tao,et al.  Efficient Adaptive Turbo Equalization for Multiple-Input–Multiple-Output Underwater Acoustic Communications , 2018, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[27]  Lu Liu,et al.  A family of sparse group Lasso RLS algorithms with adaptive regularization parameters for adaptive decision feedback equalizer in the underwater acoustic communication system , 2017, Phys. Commun..