The effect of anatomic landmark selection of the distal humerus on registration accuracy in computer-assisted elbow surgery.

Incorrect selection of the flexion-extension axis of the elbow may be an important cause of failure following total elbow arthroplasty. Axis selection can be improved by locating it on a pre-operative image and registering the image to the subject intra-operatively. However, registration is dependent on the availability of anatomic landmarks that may be distorted or absent because of tumors, arthritis, dislocations, or fractures. This study determined the anatomic landmarks required to register surface data accurately to a pre-operative image of the distal humerus. Registration error for landmarks unlikely to be compromised by severe bone loss was 1.1 +/- 0.2 mm in translation and 0.4 +/- 0.1 degrees in rotation. These results suggest that a close alignment of a pre-operative image with intra-operative surface data can be achieved using only a relatively small portion of the distal humerus that is readily available to the surgeon, and unlikely to be compromised, even in the setting of significant articular bone loss.

[1]  B F Morrey,et al.  Loose-hinge total elbow arthroplasty. An experimental study of the effects of implant alignment on three-dimensional elbow kinematics. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  Colin P McDonald,et al.  A comparison of registration techniques for computer- and image-assisted elbow surgery , 2007, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[3]  田村 裕一 Surface-based registration accuracy of CT-based image-guided spine surgery , 2005 .

[4]  L. Holly,et al.  Evaluation of registration techniques for spinal image guidance. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Brigitte M Jolles,et al.  Computer-assisted Cup Placement Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty Improve Accuracy of Placement , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  T D Brown,et al.  Radiographic determinants of the elbow rotation axis: Experimental identification and quantitative validation , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  A. Carr,et al.  Outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: comparative study of three implants. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[10]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Automatic Lumbar Vertebral Identification Using Surface-Based Registration , 2001, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  W R Fright,et al.  Use of hand-held laser scanning in the assessment of facial swelling: a preliminary study. , 2004, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  Daniel B. Russakoff,et al.  Intensity-based 2D-3D spine image registration incorporating a single fiducial marker. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[13]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Surgeon accuracy in the selection of the flexion-extension axis of the elbow: an in vitro study. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[14]  Randy E. Ellis,et al.  Robust registration for computer-integrated orthopedic surgery: Laboratory validation and clinical experience , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[15]  R. Goitz Distal Humeral Fractures Treated With Noncustom Total Elbow Replacement , 2006 .

[16]  Bernard F. Morrey,et al.  The Elbow and Its Disorders , 2000 .

[17]  N. Sugano Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[18]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  L. Amiot,et al.  Computed Tomography-Based Navigation for Hip, Knee, and Spine Surgery , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  Ken Yamaguchi,et al.  Elbow arthroplasty using a convertible implant. , 2005, Techniques in hand & upper extremity surgery.

[21]  Robert J. Maciunas,et al.  Registration of head CT images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces [image-guided surgery] , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  B F Morrey,et al.  Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty for tumours of the distal humerus and elbow. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  P. Rozing,et al.  Systematic review of primary total elbow prostheses used for the rheumatoid elbow , 2004, Clinical Rheumatology.

[24]  R. Ellis,et al.  Computer-assisted localization of osteoid osteoma: an initial experience. , 2007, Orthopedics.

[25]  B. Morrey,et al.  Distal humeral fractures treated with noncustom total elbow replacement. Surgical technique. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  William J. Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[27]  K. An,et al.  Intrinsic constraint of unlinked total elbow replacements--the ulnotrochlear joint. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  Kai-Nan An Kinematics and constraint of total elbow arthroplasty. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[29]  D.M. Muratore,et al.  Surface-based registration of CT images to physical space for image-guided surgery of the spine: a sensitivity study , 2002, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[30]  H E Veeger,et al.  Determination of the optimal elbow axis for evaluation of placement of prostheses. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.