Interdigitation for effective design space exploration using iSIGHT

Abstract.Optimization studies for nonlinear constrained problems (i.e. most complex engineering design problems) have repeatedly shown that (i) no single optimization technique performs best for all design problems, and (ii) in most cases, a mix of techniques perform better than a single technique for a given design problem. iSIGHT TM is a generic software framework for integration, automation, and optimization of design processes that has been developed on the foundation of interdigitation: the strategy of combining multiple optimization algorithms to exploit their desirable aspects for solving complex problems. With the recent paradigm shift from traditional optimization to design space exploration for evaluating “what-if” scenarios and trade-off studies, iSIGHT has grown from an optimization software system to a complete design exploration environment, providing a suite of design exploration tools including a collection of optimization techniques, design of experiments techniques, approximation methods, and probabilistic quality engineering methods. Likewise, the interdigitation design methodology embodied in iSIGHT has grown to support the interdigitation of all design exploration tools for effective design space exploration. In this paper we present an overview of iSIGHT, past and present, of the interdigitation design methodology and its implementation for multiple design exploration tools, and of an industrial case study for which elements of this methodology have been applied.

[1]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  On the Use of Statistics in Design and the Implications for Deterministic Computer Experiments , 1997 .

[2]  Shih-Ping Han A globally convergent method for nonlinear programming , 1975 .

[3]  C A Cornell,et al.  A PROBABILITY BASED STRUCTURAL CODE , 1969 .

[4]  Eduardo Saliby,et al.  Descriptive Sampling: A Better Approach to Monte Carlo Simulation , 1990 .

[5]  Timothy K. Hasselman,et al.  Reliability based structural design optimization for practical applications , 1997 .

[6]  Siu Shing Tong,et al.  Engineous: A unified method for design automation, optimization, and integration , 1992 .

[7]  Yuan Charles,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), Part II , 2000 .

[8]  Srinivas Kodiyalam,et al.  Design of Experiments based response surface models for design optimization , 1998 .

[9]  S. Ashley,et al.  Engineous explores the design space , 1992 .

[10]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors , 1996 .

[11]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods , 1965 .

[12]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[13]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  A fast algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations , 1978 .

[14]  Kalman Ziha,et al.  Descriptive sampling in structural safety , 1995 .

[15]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[16]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  THE CONVERGENCE OF VARIABLE METRIC METHODS FOR NONLINEARLY CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION CALCULATIONS , 1978 .

[17]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[18]  K. Schittkowski On the Convergence of a Sequential Quadratic Programming Method with an Augmented Lagrangian Line Search Functions. , 1982 .

[19]  Sanjay Goel,et al.  Toward Modeling the Concurrent Design of Aircraft Engine Turbines , 1993 .

[20]  D. Stamatis,et al.  Orthogonal Arrays and Linear Graphs , 2002 .

[21]  Shih-Ping Han,et al.  Superlinearly convergent variable metric algorithms for general nonlinear programming problems , 1976, Math. Program..

[22]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Introduction to Optimum Design , 1988 .