METODOLOGÍA CIENTÍFICA EN VALORACIÓN Y SELECCIÓN AMBIENTAL

El paradigma de la racionalidad sustantiva ha dominado la investigacion cientifica durante la mayor parte del siglo XX. No obstante, cuando se trabaja con aspectos intangibles y multiples criterios, como sucede en valoracion y seleccion ambiental, esta filosofia positivista orientada a la prediccion y el control presenta serias limitaciones, lo que ha llevado desde comienzo de los 70 a la busqueda de nuevas aproximaciones. El constructivismo y la ciencia postnormal son algunas de las mas extendidas en el campo de la economia ecologica. En lo que sigue, se analiza su relacion con una de las aproximaciones mas recientes en este ambito: la racionalidad procedimental multicriterio, intentando establecer un marco para la metodologia cientifica en seleccion ambiental.

[1]  Cathal M. Brugha,et al.  The structure of adjustment decision-making , 1998 .

[2]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (an excerpt) , 1991, Journal of Economic Sociology.

[3]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[4]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[5]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues , 1991 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[7]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Heathens, Heretics, and Cults: The Religious Spectrum of Decision Aiding , 1992 .

[8]  Bodo Glaser.  Fundamentals of Decision Making , 2002 .

[9]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Decision support systems : an organizational perspective , 1978 .

[10]  C. Beed.  Do Value Judgements Affect Testing Economic Theory , 1992 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[12]  José María Moreno Jiménez,et al.  Validez y robustez y estabilidad en decisión multicriterio: análisis de sensibilidad en el proceso analítico jerárquico , 1998 .

[13]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Economics of outdoor recreation , 1967 .

[14]  J. Nelson.  Feminism, objectivity and economics , 1995 .

[15]  TOWARDS A POSTMODERN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[16]  M. Jacobs.  What is socio-ecological economics? , 1996 .

[17]  M. Blaug.  The methodology of economics, or, How economists explain , 1980 .

[18]  S. Rosen.  Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  B. Roy.  Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision , 1985 .

[20]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  Multicriteria procedural rationality on SISDEMA , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[22]  Ron Janssen.  Multiobjective Decision Support for Environmental Management , 1992 .

[23]  M. Hesse,et al.  Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science , 1980 .

[24]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Price Indexes and Quality Change: Studies in New Methods of Measurement , 1971 .

[25]  F. Suppe.  The Structure of Scientific Theories. , 1975 .

[26]  Ben Fine,et al.  Feminism, Objectivity and Economics. , 1996 .

[27]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Decision science or decision-aid science? , 1993 .

[28]  L. Tacconi,et al.  Scientific methodology for ecological economics , 1998 .

[29]  L. Cronbach.  Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. , 1975 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[31]  Daniel M. Hausman,et al.  The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics , 1993 .

[32]  D. Diakoulaki,et al.  Multicriteria analysis vs. externalities assessment for the comparative evaluation of electricity generation systems , 1997 .

[33]  Edward H. Graham,et al.  Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies , 1953 .

[34]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .

[35]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[36]  Cathal M. Brugha,et al.  The structure of qualitative decision-making , 1998 .

[37]  Matthew Gandy,et al.  Crumbling land: the postmodernity debate and the analysis of environmental problems , 1996 .

[38]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[39]  A. J. Woodhill,et al.  The second wing of the eagle: the human dimension in learning our way to more sustainable futures , 1994 .

[40]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[41]  Cathal M. Brugha.  The structure of development decision-making , 1998 .

[42]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[43]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science , 1994 .

[44]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Price Indexes And Quality Change , 1973 .

[45]  Mordechai I. Henig,et al.  Objectivity and subjectivity in thedecision making process , 1998, Ann. Oper. Res..

[46]  Morris Berman.  The Reenchantment of the World , 1981 .

[47]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[48]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[49]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .

[50]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Using Values in Operations Research , 1994, Oper. Res..

[51]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .