Development in diesel spray characterisation and modelling

Experiments into the characteristics of Diesel fuel injection equipment (FIE) and fuel spray formation have been conducted on a high-pressure and temperature rapid compression machine (Proteus) to simulate realistic Diesel engine working conditions. Two multi-hole injectors, of the solenoid type, were used; one with a faster response actuator. A high speed video image acquisition system was used to characterise the liquid spray formation, penetration, cone angle, and general spray structure. The experimental spray penetration data have revealed the onset of spray tip instability (cluster shedding) at the later stages of spray penetration. The instantaneous rate and shape of injection for different operating conditions has been measured using an injection rate-tube technique. The combination of the above techniques has allowed an alternative approach in the use of empirical spray penetration correlation to be modified in order to gain information on breakup length. This was achieved by way of the derivation of a breakup length proportionality constant, where historically, this constant was found experimentally. An approach to the modelling of transient spray penetration based on the momentum conservation of the in-jected fuel mass as a physical body of varying mass under that action of the drag force acting on the whole body. For cases under consideration, this approach allows a better representation of early stage of spray penetration than the traditional modelling of each individual droplet under conventional Lagrangian approach which is widely employed by CFD codes. It is suggested that the method based on the Centre-of-Mass tracking can ac-count better for the collective effects between droplets in a dense spray.

[1]  A. Leipertz,et al.  Investigation of the Primary Spray Breakup Close to the Nozzle of a Common - Rail High Pressure Diesel Injection System , 2000 .

[2]  J. Naber,et al.  Effects of Gas Density and Vaporization on Penetration and Dispersion of Diesel Sprays , 1996 .

[3]  Cyril Crua,et al.  In-Cylinder Penetration and Break-Up of Diesel Sprays Using a Common-Rail Injection System , 2002 .

[4]  J. Jorgensen,et al.  Structure of high-pressure KNO3-IV , 1985 .

[5]  W. H. Nurick,et al.  Orifice Cavitation and Its Effect on Spray Mixing , 1976 .

[6]  R. A. Johns,et al.  A Detailed Modelling of the Spray Ignition Process in Diesel Engines , 2000 .

[7]  Cyril Crua,et al.  Combustion processes in a diesel engine , 2002 .

[8]  M. W. Thring,et al.  Combustion length of enclosed turbulent jet flames , 1953 .

[9]  J. C. Dent A basis for the comparison of various experimental methods for studying spray penetration. , 1971 .

[10]  Francisco Payri,et al.  Characterization of D.I. Diesel Sprays in High Density Conditions , 1996 .

[11]  Morgan Heikal,et al.  A model for fuel spray penetration , 2001 .

[12]  E R Karimi,et al.  High-Speed Photography of Fuel Spray and Combustion Events in a Production Diesel Engine and Combustion Bomb , 1989 .

[13]  Frediano V. Bracco,et al.  On the Intact Core of Full-Cone Sprays , 1985 .

[14]  R. Reitz,et al.  Structure of High-Pressure Fuel Sprays , 1987 .

[15]  J. Mulholland,et al.  Influence of droplet spacing on drag coefficient in nonevaporating, monodisperse streams , 1988 .

[16]  Cyril Crua,et al.  The initial stage of fuel spray penetration☆ , 2003 .

[17]  Masataka Arai,et al.  Disintegrating Process and Spray Characterization of Fuel Jet Injected by a Diesel Nozzle , 1984 .

[18]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  MECHANISMS OF AIR-ASSISTED LIQUID ATOMIZATION , 1993 .