Levelling in antiquity: instrumentation, techniques and accuracies

Abstract Certain major ancient engineering constructions, such as aqueducts and qanats, testify to high accuracies in the computation of elevation differences obtained using primitive levelling instruments. Based on the typology of ancient levelling instruments and the analysis of certain key ancient structures such as the (Eupalinos) tunnel at Samos Island (Greece), it became possible to specify the accuracy, and especially the measuring techniques and procedures of levelling in antiquity, ignored so far by non-professional investigators. Ancient levelling techniques were derived on the basis of trials and errors over past centuries and include standard length sighting distances (revealing that ‘cord stretching’ may also indicate levelling), stadias with fine focussing on sliding targets adapted to the level field of view, two-way measurement in levels and stadias, repeated and redundant observations in loops, measurements by skilled professionals. These techniques permit to limit and randomise systematic errors and to obtain accuracies up to a few centimetres per kilometre are likely to indicate a real theory of error propagation and are reminiscent of the techniques used in our days in extraordinary projects (the alignment of the CERN colliders, etc.).

[1]  S. Stiros,et al.  Recent vertical movements across the Atalandi fault-zone (Central Greece) , 1985 .

[2]  G. Veis,et al.  New constraints on the rapid crustal motion of the Aegean region: recent results inferred from GPS measurements (1993–1998) across the West Hellenic Arc, Greece , 1999 .

[3]  L. Brown,et al.  Neotectonic Deformation, Near-Surface Movements and Systematic Errors in U.S. Releveling Measurements: Implications for Earthquake Prediction , 2013 .

[4]  K. Grewe Licht am Ende des Tunnels: Planung und Trassierung im antiken Tu , 2000 .

[5]  Henri Goblot,et al.  Les qanats : une technique d'acquisition de l'eau , 1979 .

[6]  N. Fonder,et al.  Roman aqueduct and hydraulic engineering: case of Nîmes aqueduct and its Pont du Gard bridge , 2007 .

[7]  B. White,et al.  When the Pyramids Were Built: Egyptian Art of the Old Kingdom , 1999 .

[8]  Ross S. Stein,et al.  Discrimination of Tectonic Displacement from Slope‐Dependent Errors in Geodetic Leveling from Southern California, 1953–1979 , 2013 .

[9]  S. Stiros ORIENTATION AND ALIGNMENT OF THE 5th CENTURY BC TUNNEL OF EUPALINUS AT SAMOS (GREECE) , 2009 .

[10]  Stathis C. Stiros,et al.  Accurate measurements with primitive instruments: the “paradox” in the qanat design , 2006 .

[11]  G. Garbrecht Die Wasserleitung des Eupalinos auf Samos , 1995 .

[12]  David W. Simpson,et al.  Earthquake prediction : an international review , 1981 .

[13]  J. Smith Surveying Instruments of Greece and Rome , 2003 .

[14]  H. E. Wulff The Qanats of Iran , 1968 .

[15]  T. Heath Aristarchus of Samos, the Ancient Copernicus , 1913 .

[16]  Guilhem Fabre,et al.  L' aqueduc de Nîmes et le Pont du Gard , 1994 .

[17]  W. Strange The impact of refraction correction on leveling interpretations in Southern California , 1981 .

[18]  Petr Vaníček,et al.  Geodetic leveling and its applications , 1980 .

[19]  S. Stiros Misconceptions for risks of coastal flooding following the excavation of the Suez and the Corinth canals in antiquity , 2007 .