Crossover-Based Tree Distance in Genetic Programming
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Leonardo Vanneschi,et al. Operator-Based Distance for Genetic Programming: Subtree Crossover Distance , 2005, EuroGP.
[2] Jason M. Daida,et al. What Makes a Problem GP-Hard? Validating a Hypothesis of Structural Causes , 2003, GECCO.
[3] Tim Jones. Evolutionary Algorithms, Fitness Landscapes and Search , 1995 .
[4] Leonardo Vanneschi,et al. Fitness Distance Correlation in Structural Mutation Genetic Programming , 2003, EuroGP.
[5] John R. Koza,et al. Genetic programming - on the programming of computers by means of natural selection , 1993, Complex adaptive systems.
[6] Una-May O'Reilly,et al. Program Search with a Hierarchical Variable Lenght Representation: Genetic Programming, Simulated Annealing and Hill Climbing , 1994, PPSN.
[7] Leonardo Vanneschi,et al. Theory and practice for efficient genetic programming , 2004 .
[8] Graham Kendall,et al. Problem Difficulty and Code Growth in Genetic Programming , 2004, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.
[9] David E. Goldberg,et al. Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .
[10] Steven M. Gustafson. An analysis of diversity in genetic programming , 2004 .
[11] D. Goldberg. How Fitness Structure Affects Subsolution Acquisition in Genetic Programming , 1998 .
[12] Leonardo Vanneschi,et al. A Study of Fitness Distance Correlation as a Difficulty Measure in Genetic Programming , 2005, Evolutionary Computation.
[13] Anikó Ekárt,et al. Maintaining the Diversity of Genetic Programs , 2002, EuroGP.
[14] Giancarlo Mauri,et al. Using Subtree Crossover Distance to Investigate Genetic Programming Dynamics , 2006, EuroGP.
[15] Victor J. Rayward-Smith,et al. Fitness Distance Correlation and Ridge Functions , 1998, PPSN.
[16] Nguyen Xuan Hoai,et al. Representation and structural difficulty in genetic programming , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.
[17] Mark Wineberg,et al. Distance between Populations , 2003, GECCO.
[18] Terry Jones,et al. Fitness Distance Correlation as a Measure of Problem Difficulty for Genetic Algorithms , 1995, ICGA.
[19] Kalyanmoy Deb,et al. Analyzing Deception in Trap Functions , 1992, FOGA.
[20] N. Hopper,et al. Analysis of genetic diversity through population history , 1999 .
[21] Riccardo Poli,et al. General Schema Theory for Genetic Programming with Subtree-Swapping Crossover: Part I , 2003, Evolutionary Computation.
[22] Wolfgang Banzhaf,et al. Explicit Control of Diversity and Effective Variation Distance in Linear Genetic Programming , 2002, EuroGP.
[23] Peter J. Angeline,et al. The Royal Tree Problem, a Benchmark for Single and Multiple Population Genetic Programming , 1996 .
[24] Riccardo Poli,et al. Topological crossover for the permutation representation , 2005, GECCO '05.
[25] Graham Kendall,et al. Diversity in genetic programming: an analysis of measures and correlation with fitness , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.
[26] Alberto Moraglio. Geometric Unification of Evolutionary Algorithms , 2006 .
[27] Lee Altenberg,et al. Fitness Distance Correlation Analysis: An Instructive Counterexample , 1997, ICGA.