CAUSAL INFERENCE, PATH ANALYSIS AND RECURSIVE STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELS

Rubin's model for causal inference in experiments and observational studies is enlarged to analyze the problem of “causes causing causes” and is compared to path analysis and recursive structural equations models. A special quasi-experimental design, the encouragement design, is used to give concreteness to the discussion by focusing on the simplest problem that involves both direct and indirect causation. Rubin's model is shown to extend easily to this situation and to specify conditions under which the parameters of path analysis and recursive structural equations models have causal interpretations.

[1]  S. Wright.  The Method of Path Coefficients , 1934 .

[2]  J. Neyman,et al.  Statistical Problems in Agricultural Experimentation , 1935 .

[3]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[4]  H. Blalock.  Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research , 1966 .

[5]  O. D. Duncan.  Path Analysis: Sociological Examples , 1966, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  D. Rubin.  Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[7]  Arthur S. Goldberger,et al.  Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. , 1974 .

[8]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  Introduction to Structural Equation Models. , 1977 .

[9]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[10]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlation and causality , 1979 .

[11]  D. Rubin.  Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test Comment , 1980 .

[12]  D. Rubin,et al.  ON LORD'S PARADOX , 1982 .

[13]  D. Rubin,et al.  Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study with Binary Outcome , 1983 .

[14]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[15]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[16]  Spencer S. Swinton,et al.  Effects of Self-Study for Coachable Test Item Types. , 1984 .

[17]  D. Rubin,et al.  Comment: Estimating the Effects Caused by Treatments , 1984 .

[18]  P. Rosenbaum.  The Consequences of Adjustment for a Concomitant Variable that Has Been Affected by the Treatment , 1984 .

[19]  P. Rosenbaum.  From Association to Causation in Observational Studies: The Role of Tests of Strongly Ignorable Treatment Assignment , 1984 .

[20]  P. Rosenbaum.  Conditional Permutation Tests and the Propensity Score in Observational Studies , 1984 .

[21]  E. Sturt.  Estimating morbidity risks with variable age of onset. , 1985, Biometrics.

[22]  D. Rubin,et al.  The Bias Due to Incomplete Matching , 1985 .

[23]  D. Rubin,et al.  Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score , 1985 .

[24]  D. Rubin.  Statistics and Causal Inference: Comment: Which Ifs Have Causal Answers , 1986 .

[25]  C. Glymour.  Statistics and Causal Inference: Comment: Statistics and Metaphysics , 1986 .

[26]  J. Robins.  A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect , 1986 .

[27]  P. Holland.  Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[28]  Paul W. Holland,et al.  WHICH COMES FIRST, CAUSE OR EFFECT? , 1987 .

[29]  D. Freedman.  As Others See Us: A Case Study in Path Analysis , 1987 .

[30]  P. Rosenbaum.  The Role of a Second Control Group in an Observational Study , 1987 .

[31]  David Rogosa,et al.  Casual Models Do Not Support Scientific Conclusions: A Comment in Support of Freedman , 1987 .

[32]  D. Rubin,et al.  Causal Inference in Retrospective Studies , 1987 .

[33]  B. Singer,et al.  Causality in the Social Sciences , 1988 .