Comparison of Grab Start between Elite and Trained Swimmers

This study analysed motor control during front crawl swimming starts by elite and trained swimmers, based on comparisons of: 1) kinematic and kinetic parameters of the start and 2) variability of these parameters across 3 trials per swimmer. Given that the start time to the 15-m mark is greatly influenced by the swimming phase, the study also compared the stroking and coordinative parameters from water entry to 25-m in the 2 skill groups. The swimmers performed 3 x 25-m at the 50-m race-pace and used their preferential start technique (grab start). The elite swimmers showed better start organization as reflected by higher impulse values in the direction of intended displacement despite similar block phase durations. They then spent more time in the water entry, gliding and leg kicking phases, with shorter swimming phase duration and 15-m start time than the trained swimmers (p<0.05). The trained swimmers showed significantly lower values for stroke length and velocity (p<0.05) during the swimming phase. Analysis revealed low intra-subject variability (across the 3 trials) but high inter-subject variability, indicating that both elite and trained swimmers had mastered distinct, though different, motor patterns.

[1]  Helio Roesler,et al.  KINEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SWIMMING START: BLOCK, FLIGHT AND UNDERWATER PHASES , 2007 .

[2]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[3]  R. Emmerik,et al.  On Variability and Stability in Human Movement , 2000 .

[4]  L Seifert,et al.  The spatial-temporal and coordinative structures in elite male 100-m front crawl swimmers. , 2005, International journal of sports medicine.

[5]  Carlos Carvalho,et al.  Energetics and biomechanics as determining factors of swimming performance: updating the state of the art. , 2010, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[6]  Richard N. Hinrichs,et al.  Addition of an Approach to a Swimming Relay Start , 2000 .

[7]  G Atkinson,et al.  International Journal of Sports Medicine – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research , 2009, International journal of sports medicine.

[8]  L Seifert,et al.  Kinematical profiling of the front crawl start. , 2010, International journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Bruce Mason,et al.  A KINETIC ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ELITE SWIMMERS PERFORMING THE SPRINT START , 2007 .

[10]  R. Sanders,et al.  IMPROVING FEEDBACK ON SWIMMING TURNS AND STARTS EXPONENTIALLY , 2001 .

[11]  Roger Bartlett,et al.  Is movement variability important for sports biomechanists? , 2007, Sports biomechanics.

[12]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Constraints on the Development of Coordination , 1986 .

[13]  D Chollet,et al.  A New Index of Coordination for the Crawl: Description and Usefulness , 2000, International journal of sports medicine.

[14]  Brian Blanksby,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the grab, track and handle swimming starts: an intervention study. , 2002, Sports biomechanics.

[15]  Bruce Mason,et al.  SWIM START PERFORMANCES AT THE SYDNEY 2000 OLYMPIC GAMES , 2001 .

[16]  M. Rosenstein,et al.  The effects of arms and countermovement on vertical jumping. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  Roger Bartlett,et al.  Movement Systems as Dynamical Systems , 2003, Sports medicine.

[18]  Brian Blanksby,et al.  Jumping Ability and Swimming Grab-Start Performance in Elite and Recreational Swimmers , 2007 .

[19]  J. Heegaard,et al.  Role of arm motion in the standing long jump. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  M. E. Feltner,et al.  Upper extremity augmentation of lower extremity kinetics during countermovement vertical jumps. , 1999, Journal of sports sciences.

[21]  Keith Davids,et al.  Movement system variability , 2005 .

[22]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.